I made no such effort.brainbomb wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2024 6:59 pmI am denying the callous, toxic and abbreviated efforts toJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2024 6:56 pmYour problem apparently is that you are unable to keep track of your own posts, and when someone (me) asks you about a rationale you previously posted about someone who is apparently your top scumread, instead of answering the question, you weirdly deny ever having held that opinion.
Let's just reset and take a deep breath or two. There's no need for anyone to mute anyone else.
summarize my scumread on lfischl as “an act”. which is simply not the shallow level the scumread actually has.
this is about the fact that this is what he would do as mafia in this setup, to appear like he isnt going to lurk later
I asked you a simple question about your original basis for scumreading Lfischl, which you could have answered. I asked that question because I wanted to understand your thinking. Instead of answering my perfectly reasonable, polite question, you denied making the original argument and then got all mad at me.
Let's calm down.