M1027: Community - Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1841 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:42 am

BK3K wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:41 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:38 am
I think the vote for BK3K is the most optimum.

Let’s say we get another parity - use rdr and myself for an example. We learn that me and him are on a team while sweet and BK3K are on a team too. This doesn’t result in clear path forward, it just eliminates pairs and creates no clears. The best case is we get another pair of players that are opposite alignment - we’re more likely to get the rdr and me situation though…

We’re at a point where getting clears is immensely valuable and can auto this game.

Mathing again - next phase is 5-2…

If we “miss” and the scanned person is killed and then we know BK3K and sweet are scum - it’s 3-2 the next vote and we auto-win.

If we “hit” and the scanned person is scum, it comes down to 5-1 with 2 clears and possibly more scans to keep the chain going.
Again. Welcome to the party. Where were you before the hammer?
okay, I am at the party - who are the idiots who are arguing against it?

User avatar
heartthrob24909
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2022 12:19 am
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1842 Post by heartthrob24909 » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:44 am

I support VTs targeting BK3K in the scan

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1843 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:50 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:35 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:35 am
Will still has not explained his plan nor why he thinks I'm opposed to it.
Plan is a few pages back.

I just assumed that calling me scummy in your head discredited my plan as something that mafia could get away with
I'm having trouble understanding it.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 6642
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1844 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:42 am
BK3K wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:41 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:38 am
I think the vote for BK3K is the most optimum.

Let’s say we get another parity - use rdr and myself for an example. We learn that me and him are on a team while sweet and BK3K are on a team too. This doesn’t result in clear path forward, it just eliminates pairs and creates no clears. The best case is we get another pair of players that are opposite alignment - we’re more likely to get the rdr and me situation though…

We’re at a point where getting clears is immensely valuable and can auto this game.

Mathing again - next phase is 5-2…

If we “miss” and the scanned person is killed and then we know BK3K and sweet are scum - it’s 3-2 the next vote and we auto-win.

If we “hit” and the scanned person is scum, it comes down to 5-1 with 2 clears and possibly more scans to keep the chain going.
Again. Welcome to the party. Where were you before the hammer?
okay, I am at the party - who are the idiots who are arguing against it?
Sweet actively opposes it. BK pointed out some edge cases which are very unlikely and still give town a statistical advantage in all possible scenarios. Heart did the same as BK.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 6642
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1845 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:50 am
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:35 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:35 am
Will still has not explained his plan nor why he thinks I'm opposed to it.
Plan is a few pages back.

I just assumed that calling me scummy in your head discredited my plan as something that mafia could get away with
I'm having trouble understanding it.
What edge cases are you thinking about?

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1846 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am

I think if I follow it, you want to chain a third scan to B3K?

sweetandcool
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1847 Post by sweetandcool » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:54 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:41 am
heartthrob24909 wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:54 am
Worcej and Chaqa both cast end votes while implying that they had not read recent thread happenings. They set up an opportunity for ghug to seal the day.
worcej wrote:
Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:57 pm
##vote ghug
##end

Also good with a heart night vote.

And to clarify - this means BK3K and Sweet are opposite alignments?
^Would town still not know how to read the investigation results?
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:13 am
Getting caught up but obviously
##Vote ghug
##END
FWIW, it isn’t scummy to end the phase on a confirmed scum. Keep the momentum moving forward.

If the conversation you find important stops, that’s your fault not mine.
It's the abundance of shit takes like this one that has made this the single most difficult game of Mafia for me, which is shocking considering how town-sided the investigation mechanic is. I can't sort when too many people are saying things that are helpful to Mafia.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1848 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:55 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am
I think if I follow it, you want to chain a third scan to B3K?
Second scan, which chains a 3rd person.

We either get 3 clears or a 50/50 again.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1849 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:57 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:55 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am
I think if I follow it, you want to chain a third scan to B3K?
Second scan, which chains a 3rd person.

We either get 3 clears or a 50/50 again.
Yeah, I like this because it keeps us out of the awkward multiple 50/50 pairings as we near LYLO problem.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1850 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:58 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:54 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:41 am
heartthrob24909 wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:54 am
Worcej and Chaqa both cast end votes while implying that they had not read recent thread happenings. They set up an opportunity for ghug to seal the day.



^Would town still not know how to read the investigation results?

FWIW, it isn’t scummy to end the phase on a confirmed scum. Keep the momentum moving forward.

If the conversation you find important stops, that’s your fault not mine.
It's the abundance of shit takes like this one that has made this the single most difficult game of Mafia for me, which is shocking considering how town-sided the investigation mechanic is. I can't sort when too many people are saying things that are helpful to Mafia.
Yeah, when you get to like 40+ games of Mafia here like me, you can scold my take here.

I have seen MANY games die out because scum drag a game out and keep phases running longer than needed by not hammering phases, to get town interest to drain and their desire to keep the process going.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1851 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:59 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:57 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:55 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:52 am
I think if I follow it, you want to chain a third scan to B3K?
Second scan, which chains a 3rd person.

We either get 3 clears or a 50/50 again.
Yeah, I like this because it keeps us out of the awkward multiple 50/50 pairings as we near LYLO problem.
Exactly - the two sets of pairs getting into the next phases is the worst case scenario and is probable.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14307
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1852 Post by Chaqa » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:59 am

I'm with worcej re: the end vote. I won't apologize for it.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1853 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:02 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:59 am
I'm with worcej re: the end vote. I won't apologize for it.
We’re here to kill scum. When one is in the unquestionably caught, you hammer down and send them to the GT.

BK3K
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1854 Post by BK3K » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:04 am

I did a table of analysis in Excel, is it legal to paste an imgur link to a photo of that analysis?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1855 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:05 am

BK3K wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:04 am
I did a table of analysis in Excel, is it legal to paste an imgur link to a photo of that analysis?
I think so because it’s a link. Just make it an image.

BK3K
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1856 Post by BK3K » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:10 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:05 am
BK3K wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:04 am
I did a table of analysis in Excel, is it legal to paste an imgur link to a photo of that analysis?
I think so because it’s a link. Just make it an image.
Imgur wasn't working

https://postimg.cc/pms16qC7

I think the plan is good tho

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1857 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:20 am

Quick look and I follow your logic and outcomes. They are all super dependent on scum NK choice.

IDGAF about getting spewed for this - but scum would be dumb to kill sweet or BK3K now, assuming they are town. They have 25% odds of hitting the investigator now and need to hit them or they are fucked. Will thinking one of these guys would get killed seemed odd after all the math he’s tried to do…

BK3K
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1858 Post by BK3K » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:30 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:58 am
sweetandcool wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:54 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:41 am
FWIW, it isn’t scummy to end the phase on a confirmed scum. Keep the momentum moving forward.

If the conversation you find important stops, that’s your fault not mine.
It's the abundance of shit takes like this one that has made this the single most difficult game of Mafia for me, which is shocking considering how town-sided the investigation mechanic is. I can't sort when too many people are saying things that are helpful to Mafia.
Yeah, when you get to like 40+ games of Mafia here like me, you can scold my take here.

I have seen MANY games die out because scum drag a game out and keep phases running longer than needed by not hammering phases, to get town interest to drain and their desire to keep the process going.
You've played 40+ games? How do you have the bandwidth? This is exhausting lol. And I say this as one of the lower effort players

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1859 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:45 am

BK3K wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:30 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:58 am
sweetandcool wrote:
Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:54 am


It's the abundance of shit takes like this one that has made this the single most difficult game of Mafia for me, which is shocking considering how town-sided the investigation mechanic is. I can't sort when too many people are saying things that are helpful to Mafia.
Yeah, when you get to like 40+ games of Mafia here like me, you can scold my take here.

I have seen MANY games die out because scum drag a game out and keep phases running longer than needed by not hammering phases, to get town interest to drain and their desire to keep the process going.
You've played 40+ games? How do you have the bandwidth? This is exhausting lol. And I say this as one of the lower effort players
Been here since like 2018? We used to fire a game off every month.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread

#1860 Post by worcej » Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:46 am

Can confirm - early 2018 lol

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GlitterBomb