M1027: Community - Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
As a persona, assume MadMonarch is town. Could they so easily drop the vote on anyone, anyone at all, and just walk away? I get the particular challenges that the time zones can exert. Posting that day consists of agreeing with bozo's mech idea, some brief interlude with Kak, but then votes Kak due to the questioning of the town positions which Kak called "conformity." And mech, mech, mechs.
Vs
assume MM is mafia. I was going to call it haphazard but it wasn't...but the vote on anyone can be argued away as simple time zones, sleep, etc. However, isn't it convenient that the drop on Kak ultimately manifested in heavily tied wagons at EOD.
Not sure where I am going there with all of that, but it seems suspect to me.
As a start.
Vs
assume MM is mafia. I was going to call it haphazard but it wasn't...but the vote on anyone can be argued away as simple time zones, sleep, etc. However, isn't it convenient that the drop on Kak ultimately manifested in heavily tied wagons at EOD.
Not sure where I am going there with all of that, but it seems suspect to me.
As a start.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
@ham
What is your view of buddying as a tactic? If you were scum, might you buddy? Why or why not? And HOW would you buddy?
What is your view of buddying as a tactic? If you were scum, might you buddy? Why or why not? And HOW would you buddy?
- heartthrob24909
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2022 12:19 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
"D1 really killed my interest in this game."worcej wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:18 pmI think you could be. But it would require me to be more interested in really digging for it, but I’m not. I’ll care more when I feel I need to, but D1 really killed my interest in this game.
Why?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 34178
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Bozo has interrogated Hamilton and Sweetandcool. That's two persons.dargorygel wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:12 pmI've been trying to reconcile: Monarch and Bozo's work on a system to aid the investigator (they did come up with systems... and those systems could have hurt scum's chances by aiding the investigator) with the things that seem scummy about them (Monarch not carefully reading... bozo has less scummy things, but does not do much bozo things. He grilled/drilled one person, but usually we see more of that iirc.).
Potato, potato; potato.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Correct.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:30 pmBozo has interrogated Hamilton and Sweetandcool. That's two persons.dargorygel wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:12 pmI've been trying to reconcile: Monarch and Bozo's work on a system to aid the investigator (they did come up with systems... and those systems could have hurt scum's chances by aiding the investigator) with the things that seem scummy about them (Monarch not carefully reading... bozo has less scummy things, but does not do much bozo things. He grilled/drilled one person, but usually we see more of that iirc.).
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
The problem with this is that it is not what you said at the beginning of the day:sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 2:59 amI feel like I'm living in the twilight zone, this makes absolutely no sense.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:26 amEither way, Just's point is valid.sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 12:57 am
It really does look that way. How unfortunate if you believe that though.
We do not want two MK in a row, this is just Will being Will.
I'll spell it out for you, but I really am getting tired of explaining obvious things.
1. damo strongly suggests we don't DK him, that it is a big mistake.
Practically anyone is going to take that as him sitting the investigator role.
If he really is investigator this is incredibly bad play, particularly because he was far from guaranteed to be the DK (but yes, under some pressure).
Consequently we must conclude one of three things (for Mafia only two).
A. Damo pulled a worcej and PR claimed under some pressure.
B. Damo is bluffing in an attempt to eat a NK.
C. Damo is Mafia trying to forestall his demise.
I would expect Mafia to conclude B because A is unlikely and it is so damo-like. It is incredibly interesting that Mafia was naive enough to conclude A (or at least treat it as enough of a possibility that it would be worth a NK).
It is more tricky for town because we were stuck trying to decide between B or C.
If damo had come under pressure D2 (if he is investigator then why is he not the NK?), I would have tried to ensure his survival another day. This would have ensured that if he was town that Mafia would feel pressure to NK him N2 or in the case he was Mafia we would have felt comfortable voting him D3.
So yeah, damo was obviously not the investigator.
How do you reconcile damo being the obvious NK with him obviously not being the investigator?sweetandcool wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 11:25 pmDamo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?
Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
It is the same reason I voted for him last game.heartthrob24909 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:02 pmThis is a valid point to make, and one I agree with, but I can't get behind it being justification for voting for Sweet right now in this gameJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:54 pmIt is impossible to make genuine ones because as Mafia you already know the fucking answer.sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:06 am
I really wish bunny was in this game, he would understand.
Have you read his notes in the godthread for other Mafia games? He frequently reads people's alignment, ignoring the fact as Mafia or spectator he would know it.
I am baffled so many people on this website think it is impossible to make alignment reads as Mafia.
Making a "read" involves deduction. It is not possible to deduce an answer you were handed in writing at the outset of the game!
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 4890
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Then vote me every game because it is literally never changing.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:39 pmIt is the same reason I voted for him last game.heartthrob24909 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:02 pmThis is a valid point to make, and one I agree with, but I can't get behind it being justification for voting for Sweet right now in this gameJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:54 pm
It is impossible to make genuine ones because as Mafia you already know the fucking answer.
Making a "read" involves deduction. It is not possible to deduce an answer you were handed in writing at the outset of the game!
This is like voting me for my username, the most moronic way to play.
-
- Posts: 4890
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
It was obvious he was attempting to eat the NK. While I would expect Mafia to see through that, it still put him in much greater danger of being the NK than any other player. Consequently investigating damo is a 0 IQ play.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:38 pmThe problem with this is that it is not what you said at the beginning of the day:sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 2:59 amI feel like I'm living in the twilight zone, this makes absolutely no sense.
I'll spell it out for you, but I really am getting tired of explaining obvious things.
1. damo strongly suggests we don't DK him, that it is a big mistake.
Practically anyone is going to take that as him sitting the investigator role.
If he really is investigator this is incredibly bad play, particularly because he was far from guaranteed to be the DK (but yes, under some pressure).
Consequently we must conclude one of three things (for Mafia only two).
A. Damo pulled a worcej and PR claimed under some pressure.
B. Damo is bluffing in an attempt to eat a NK.
C. Damo is Mafia trying to forestall his demise.
I would expect Mafia to conclude B because A is unlikely and it is so damo-like. It is incredibly interesting that Mafia was naive enough to conclude A (or at least treat it as enough of a possibility that it would be worth a NK).
It is more tricky for town because we were stuck trying to decide between B or C.
If damo had come under pressure D2 (if he is investigator then why is he not the NK?), I would have tried to ensure his survival another day. This would have ensured that if he was town that Mafia would feel pressure to NK him N2 or in the case he was Mafia we would have felt comfortable voting him D3.
So yeah, damo was obviously not the investigator.How do you reconcile damo being the obvious NK with him obviously not being the investigator?sweetandcool wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 11:25 pmDamo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?
Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
The pocketing potential in this has me concerned.ghug wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:21 pmOh, you did.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:13 pmHe has been asking insightful questions and pursuing an investigatory approach. Nobody appears to be working harder to solve the game, than Bozo.
There is nothing scummy about him.
I agree with your conclusion.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 34178
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Thank you for acknowledging that you were incorrect.dargorygel wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:32 pmCorrect.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:30 pmBozo has interrogated Hamilton and Sweetandcool. That's two persons.dargorygel wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:12 pmI've been trying to reconcile: Monarch and Bozo's work on a system to aid the investigator (they did come up with systems... and those systems could have hurt scum's chances by aiding the investigator) with the things that seem scummy about them (Monarch not carefully reading... bozo has less scummy things, but does not do much bozo things. He grilled/drilled one person, but usually we see more of that iirc.).
Potato, potato; potato.
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
It still seems to me that your original post did not give enough consideration that the investigator was concerned about C, which makes me think you knew all along that damo was town.sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:46 pmIt was obvious he was attempting to eat the NK. While I would expect Mafia to see through that, it still put him in much greater danger of being the NK than any other player. Consequently investigating damo is a 0 IQ play.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:38 pmThe problem with this is that it is not what you said at the beginning of the day:sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 2:59 am
I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone, this makes absolutely no sense.
I'll spell it out for you, but I really am getting tired of explaining obvious things.
1. damo strongly suggests we don't DK him, that it is a big mistake.
Practically anyone is going to take that as him sitting the investigator role.
If he really is investigator this is incredibly bad play, particularly because he was far from guaranteed to be the DK (but yes, under some pressure).
Consequently we must conclude one of three things (for Mafia only two).
A. Damo pulled a worcej and PR claimed under some pressure.
B. Damo is bluffing in an attempt to eat a NK.
C. Damo is Mafia trying to forestall his demise.
I would expect Mafia to conclude B because A is unlikely and it is so damo-like. It is incredibly interesting that Mafia was naive enough to conclude A (or at least treat it as enough of a possibility that it would be worth a NK).
It is more tricky for town because we were stuck trying to decide between B or C.
If damo had come under pressure D2 (if he is investigator then why is he not the NK?), I would have tried to ensure his survival another day. This would have ensured that if he was town that Mafia would feel pressure to NK him N2 or in the case he was Mafia we would have felt comfortable voting him D3.
So yeah, damo was obviously not the investigator.How do you reconcile damo being the obvious NK with him obviously not being the investigator?sweetandcool wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 11:25 pmDamo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?
Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
So everyone but Jamie then? Any further preference? Can you open the book or are you expecting others to?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:44 pmBut in all seriousness, I think we need to open the books on MadMonarch, worcej, Chaqa. Will and Heart too.ghug wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:25 pmWho would you like to start with?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:23 pm
Is this one of those things you say in jest just to retract it later?
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
sweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:11 pmI think voting damo for low posting is just about the worst idea.BK3K wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:08 pmMy primary suspicion was that he didn't post. Sus or not, lurking isn't helpful. None of his posts since then are particularly exculpatory, but he's at least here. I do put without into the argument that he never posted but had reads on everyone. And started posting more only when called out. So, still suspicious on my mind. But I'm willing to move my vote if I find a more solid reason
In fact, damo is making more of an impression D1 than he normally does. He tends to be more impactive D2 or D3. Give him time to warm up.
Why did you argue against a damo DK then 2 minutes later say he was your only scum read?sweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:13 pmNobody, maybe damo.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:10 pmthat's kinda cold, sweet.sweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:08 pmHmph, I don't like what I'm seeing. I think either Kak or Darg should be the DK, mainly because they are lead wagons and I'm not townreading them.
Who's your biggest maf-read right now? And why?
Do have a few reasonably strong town reads. But none are in the chopping block.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Why should we look more on the pool of Kak voters?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:14 pmWhy aren't we looking more at the pool of Kak voters?
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14307
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
I still haven't looked at my role PM.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:01 pmOh god, it's Chaqa.sweetandcool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:00 pmWhen I'm Mafia I try not to look at it until halfway through D1.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 4:58 pm
It's not the same. You can enjoy reading the book again, but you still know the outcome the second time.
Unless you are trying to claim your memory is so bad that you forgot your team mates the second you look away from reading the PM?
I did have it read to me, though.
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Can you explain why you felt this way at the time you made the post?
-
- Posts: 4890
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: M1027: Community - Game Thread
Obviously I already had reasoned that damo was either trying to eat the NK or was Mafia.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 7:05 pmsweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:11 pmI think voting damo for low posting is just about the worst idea.BK3K wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:08 pm
My primary suspicion was that he didn't post. Sus or not, lurking isn't helpful. None of his posts since then are particularly exculpatory, but he's at least here. I do put without into the argument that he never posted but had reads on everyone. And started posting more only when called out. So, still suspicious on my mind. But I'm willing to move my vote if I find a more solid reason
In fact, damo is making more of an impression D1 than he normally does. He tends to be more impactive D2 or D3. Give him time to warm up.Why did you argue against a damo DK then 2 minutes later say he was your only scum read?sweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:13 pmNobody, maybe damo.
Do have a few reasonably strong town reads. But none are in the chopping block.
The right play was to preserve him D1 and probably D2, to put pressure on Mafia to NK him. If he wasn't the NK on N1 or N2 then he either would have been Mafia or we would have been outplayed by Mafia.
Separate from that is the fact that voting damo for low activity D1 is smoothbrain. It's bad regardless of his alignment.
I thought he was more likely Mafia and consequently scumleaned him. And if he actually somehow was investigator, then suspecting him without voting him would provide some small protection for him.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, DiplomacyandWarfare, Google [Bot], Hominidae, Spartaculous