M1027: Community - Game Thread

[ghug]

Jeez. Okay so if I have this right I think that townclears darg

You know what, this actually helps us a little bit. Now that we have a clear, investigator can use that information to clear another person. And we have a townclear :)

I think it is better to obtain information on 2 new players N2, as demonstrated by damo being NKed.

What do you mean by this?

[heartthrob24909]

Jumping in to say:

want to see d2 wagons on people who didnt get votes d1

##vote ghug

Gotta start somewhere

[heartthrob24909]

Jumping in to say:

want to see d2 wagons on people who didnt get votes d1

##vote ghug

Gotta start somewhere

I recognize that ghug did get a vote but only 1 and it was there very briefly. Main point of my thought is we avoid HB, Jamie, and Just at least to start

[ghug]

Damo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?

Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

Mad your team overruled you?

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

I would prefer to vote Chaqa, but I like Ghug as a vote

[sweetandcool]

Damo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?

Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

Mad your team overruled you?

Wow, thanks for making this game so easy.

##VOTE ghug

[ghug]

Jumping in to say:

want to see d2 wagons on people who didnt get votes d1

##vote ghug

Gotta start somewhere

I recognize that ghug did get a vote but only 1 and it was there very briefly. Main point of my thought is we avoid HB, Jamie, and Just at least to start

I'm probably a fine vote but we should not be avoiding people because they got attention yesterday. They're the ones we have more info on.

##VOTE Ham

[sweetandcool]

Damo eating the night kill was extremely obvious. I'm shocked the investigator wasted on him. Guess they wanted to verify darg immediately?

Glad to see my instincts have been 100% so far (that I know of).

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

You say that mafia should have kept him alive, yet you say his bluff was obvious??

Yes.....

If his bluff was not obvious, then it would have made sense to kill him.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

You say that mafia should have kept him alive, yet you say his bluff was obvious??

Yes.....

If his bluff was not obvious, then it would have made sense to kill him.

But if the bluff was obvious, we would have not voted him… because the bluff was obvious??? Huh???

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

You say that mafia should have kept him alive, yet you say his bluff was obvious??

Yes.....

If his bluff was not obvious, then it would have made sense to kill him.

Only a mafia would have known D1 that damo was bluffing.

##VOTE SWEET

[heartthrob24909]

The reasons I am not confident in the Bozo or Monarch plan are: a) it creates a false (mental) clear. The results of the plan give us good odds, but not really truth. b) We have traditionally had trouble getting everyone to take part. c) it is likely to increase laziness... in myself, admittedly.

However, if a survey begins that asks if we would take part, I am willing.

In other news
Kak's entry is different. Not AI. But he isn't reading as critically.

Wait, you don't like either?

For those who would like to see a reason for my ghug vote beyond just "he hasn't had a wagon yet":
- This was his reaction to darg's initial comment about the Bozo and Monarch systems for assigning a VT NightVote target.
- Darg is correct in his feedback to my vote on him (which I can dig up for reader convenience) that he never really came out and straight up said he didn't like either of those ideas
- Darg notably had a wagon attached to his name and some of his voters including me cited his seeming lack of cooperation with the VT NightVote optimization as a reason
- So, I wonder if this post from ghug actually went a pretty long way towards influencing how some of us read darg's words. I feel like this could be an easy narrative to twist were ghug scum.

[ghug]

You say that mafia should have kept him alive, yet you say his bluff was obvious??

Yes.....

If his bluff was not obvious, then it would have made sense to kill him.

Only a mafia would have known D1 that damo was bluffing.

##VOTE SWEET

Why?

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Yes.....

If his bluff was not obvious, then it would have made sense to kill him.

Only a mafia would have known D1 that damo was bluffing.

##VOTE SWEET

Why?

Town would think he was scum

[heartthrob24909]

Naked voting frowned upon

Mostly re:
- Dings the conversation re: investigator power for not being optimal play despite there being two pretty distinct strategies discussed. Don't love the blanket opposition to both
- Kak vote feels contrived without further context

Did you (or monarch) actually read my posts? I am not opposed. I am unsure,.

Darg's post (1 of 2) that I refer to in my recent writeup

[ghug]

The reasons I am not confident in the Bozo or Monarch plan are: a) it creates a false (mental) clear. The results of the plan give us good odds, but not really truth. b) We have traditionally had trouble getting everyone to take part. c) it is likely to increase laziness... in myself, admittedly.

However, if a survey begins that asks if we would take part, I am willing.

In other news
Kak's entry is different. Not AI. But he isn't reading as critically.

Wait, you don't like either?

For those who would like to see a reason for my ghug vote beyond just "he hasn't had a wagon yet":
- This was his reaction to darg's initial comment about the Bozo and Monarch systems for assigning a VT NightVote target.
- Darg is correct in his feedback to my vote on him (which I can dig up for reader convenience) that he never really came out and straight up said he didn't like either of those ideas
- Darg notably had a wagon attached to his name and some of his voters including me cited his seeming lack of cooperation with the VT NightVote optimization as a reason
- So, I wonder if this post from ghug actually went a pretty long way towards influencing how some of us read darg's words. I feel like this could be an easy narrative to twist were ghug scum.

I imagine it did, given that I started the wagon and other people jumped on but I also don't think it was an unfair reaction to have to darg's words.

[heartthrob24909]

Mostly re:
- Dings the conversation re: investigator power for not being optimal play despite there being two pretty distinct strategies discussed. Don't love the blanket opposition to both
- Kak vote feels contrived without further context

Did drag also support using no system? Like I said, I'm bad at reading, too impatient. I think advocating using no system is strange. We have this unique set up that gives us more power than meets the eye and we should use it

I proposed letting it be natural... but not "proposed" o also said clearly i would go along with the room

Darg's post (2 of 2) that I refer to in my recent writeup

[ghug]

Only a mafia would have known D1 that damo was bluffing.

##VOTE SWEET

Why?

Town would think he was scum

I think Will is town.

[heartthrob24909]

Wait, you don't like either?

For those who would like to see a reason for my ghug vote beyond just "he hasn't had a wagon yet":
- This was his reaction to darg's initial comment about the Bozo and Monarch systems for assigning a VT NightVote target.
- Darg is correct in his feedback to my vote on him (which I can dig up for reader convenience) that he never really came out and straight up said he didn't like either of those ideas
- Darg notably had a wagon attached to his name and some of his voters including me cited his seeming lack of cooperation with the VT NightVote optimization as a reason
- So, I wonder if this post from ghug actually went a pretty long way towards influencing how some of us read darg's words. I feel like this could be an easy narrative to twist were ghug scum.

I imagine it did, given that I started the wagon and other people jumped on but I also don't think it was an unfair reaction to have to darg's words.

Definitely fair

[heartthrob24909]

Mafia should have realized damo was bluffing and made Town make the WIFOM. We probably would have eaten him D2 or just maybe as late as D3.

Mad your team overruled you?

Wow, thanks for making this game so easy.

##VOTE ghug

This type of vote belongs back on day 1

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Why?

Town would think he was scum

I think Will is town.

how does this make you feeeeeeeeel?
How do you see my preeeeeeevooooooooous pooooosts with this new cOnTeXt???