M1027: Community - Game Thread

[Jamiet99uk]

top scum reads rn

1. Kak
2. Darg
3. Jamie

Kak and darg for opposing co-ordination. Jamie is just kinda going crazy

Cite anything I have done today that makes me *scum*, please, if you can?

[Jamiet99uk]

goodnight!

No milk or cookie for YOU!

[Jamiet99uk]

Worcej needs to get more involved. Come on, Worcester.

[Jamiet99uk]

##Vote No-Kill for now.

Would vote JustAGuyNamedWill or Sweetandcool; would vote a non-participant. Feel town vibes from Bozo, and maybe BY2J.

[Jamiet99uk]

@JustWilly:

Iso me in the bot and post up my three most scum-indicative posts, please.

This should be easy if your scumread on me is genuine and not fabricated.

[Chaqa]

top scum reads rn

1. Kak
2. Darg
3. Jamie

Kak and darg for opposing co-ordination. Jamie is just kinda going crazy

Lazy reads.

[Jamiet99uk]

top scum reads rn

1. Kak
2. Darg
3. Jamie

Kak and darg for opposing co-ordination. Jamie is just kinda going crazy

Lazy reads.

I agree with this drug-fuelled beatnik.

[heartthrob24909]

Good morning. Catching up from the middle of 13

[Chaqa]

top scum reads rn

1. Kak
2. Darg
3. Jamie

Kak and darg for opposing co-ordination. Jamie is just kinda going crazy

Lazy reads.

I agree with this drug-fuelled beatnik.

https://youtu.be/O-UfkZKKGc0?si=6rPAO2GY6M2NGviO

[heartthrob24909]

Could people who scumread me EXPLAIN WHY THEY FUCKING SCUMREAD ME, PRETTY FUCKING PLEASE?

I do not believe this is too much to ask.

This is what happened:

Jamiet makes a post reminding people to vote at night.

sweetandcool teasingly votes Jamiet for telling him what to do.

Jamiet votes sweetandcool because he perceives sweetandcool's attitude as threatening towards the investigator (which is bogus).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It feels like Jamiet is putting on an act. Jamiet likes to pretend that someone being humorous is instead being literal. In this case, your doubling down and trying to bully me feels like a scum tactic.

@sweet: in your eyes, what would be some tells that could help you differentiate [a scum player attempting to cause misdirection doubling down and bullying] from [a frustrated town player who feels like their intentions have been misread]?

[Hamilton Brian]

@Kak, I liked the analysis of bozo's plan.

I can't help think this whole push against jamie was totally a tempest in a teapot. I'd be convinced it was mafia-motivated had the votes remained. Seeing them move off could suggest a couple of things.

[heartthrob24909]

JustAGuyNamedWill feels off this game. Maybe he is scum.

I can't wait for this joke to be misinterpreted as soon as I scroll down further

[heartthrob24909]

regarding pair system I suggested, I think I would put them in one of three category (don't know if you agree, just my input):

people who get nk'ed early usually (when they are town) :

5) ghug
13) bozotheclown

mixed (sometimes early targets, sometimes not easy to read) :

2) Jamiet99uk
10) Chaqa
11) Dargorygel
14)rdrivera2005

reading them might be hard :

1) sweetandcool
3) TheMadMonarch
4) worcej
6) damo666
7) Kakarroto
8) heartthrob24909
9) Hamilton Brian
12) BK3K
15)JustAGuyNamedWill


well, this is more my opinion, I guess, and some don't fit too good into a category (like BK3K is just new to me and I don't know much about) (or worcej gets nk'ed often when he is PR) but I think I would pair people from group 1+2 with people from group 3. But yeah, that's just a suggestion and trying a little to visualize what I mean.

I like this line of thinking and am gonna have to reflect on it a little more, so consider this a take which is subject to change: I worry about having *this* much order in the pairs we investigate. Does having this much transparency in the strategy give mafia some sort of edge? I'm not sure yet. We essentially get two "guaranteed" flips each night so maybe not but I wonder if the investigator should just operate with complete individual agency.

[heartthrob24909]

What I like about 2nd vote is that its obvious. Thats the most important part, it needs to be very clear to everyone.

Agree

[Hamilton Brian]

I am sure there's something in the system that hasn't been accounted for yet; one of those "unintended consequences" things. On the surface I like it.

[heartthrob24909]

##vote darg

[Jamiet99uk]

##vote darg

Naked voting frowned upon

[heartthrob24909]

##vote darg

Naked voting frowned upon

Mostly re:
- Dings the conversation re: investigator power for not being optimal play despite there being two pretty distinct strategies discussed. Don't love the blanket opposition to both
- Kak vote feels contrived without further context

[Jamiet99uk]

##vote darg

Naked voting frowned upon

Mostly re:
- Dings the conversation re: investigator power for not being optimal play despite there being two pretty distinct strategies discussed. Don't love the blanket opposition to both
- Kak vote feels contrived without further context

Better. Thanks.

[damo666]

I would go with the 2nd highest wagon. I the event of a tie then the second person in the way the GM lists the vote (almost certainly the same as the bot).

Sorry for lateness in engaging. Festive period family duties.


I think this has won.

Can we move on now.

PS Investigator should choose who they want.