Holy hell you're rightBonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:58 pmpeople should just vote for who i want
##Vote Just
#1181 Post by Temasek22 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:04 pm
Holy hell you're rightBonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:58 pmpeople should just vote for who i want
#1182 Post by Temasek22 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:12 pm
#1183 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:27 pm
Townpoints for this response. Nobody in that bracket atm anyway.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 12:01 pmI don't agree much with this approach as this is mostly mechanical and not considering people's reasoning. It makes also easier for scum to hide if you voted Sweet you are safe. If you didn't vote Sweet just vote other non Sweet voter and you are safe. Lazy approach.damo666 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:58 amTone.
I just picked 80% as a round number > 11/14. 90 would've been better. Anyway as you keep pursuing this I think the likelihood you were bussing diminishes.
I am now thinking all 3 mafia were off sweet and I think we should concentrate on this group. The strategy is still sound with one busser.
In fact I would be inclined to vote anyone off sweet who votes for a sweet voter.
#1184 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:51 pm
#1185 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:57 pm
Okay, so Hamilton is turning this into a quiz for the class. I see.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:14 pmI've got two particular moments. If it's picked up by others then I'll feel validated. If not, then I'll know that I was probably on the wrong track.
If you were OMGUS-ing as mafia, I'd expect you to do it more subtly.
Or would you...?
#1186 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:00 pm
#1187 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:06 pm
I was really talking about D1/N1 deliberate lurking in order to simply survive. We're well into day 2 now.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:00 pmAvatar Chaqa Wild.png
Earlier today you said you thought Chaqa's inactivity was NAI.
What changed your view?
#1188 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:14 pm
This?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:34 pmBut seriously ##Vote No-Kill as a placeholder while I reconsider.
Nobody went for my Temasek wagon. But let the record show that I wanted a Temasek wagon D1*.
* I would say this as scum if Temasek was my partner(1).
(1) Or would I?
#1189 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:16 pm
ThisJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 11:09 amThis is a coherent explanation, thank you Temasek.Temasek22 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 12:38 amI probably worded it poorly, but I was aware that the substitution had no impact on Macca's vote, in fact, it made Macca pull her vote out of ND/Bona
From my view, the way things happened was.
>ND acted very hostile, enough for Macca to think he's scum on reread
>ND subs out for Bona
>Macca rereads the thread due to missing early game, and votes for Bona due to ND's actions before subbing out
>Macca changes vote to No Kill due to out-of-game factors regarding Bona
I just found this sequence interesting, and suspicious on first glance. But come to think of it now it feels more like town behaviour
#1190 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:38 pm
#1191 Post by damo666 » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:46 pm
It's hard to know what's mushrooming in Brian's brain but maybe he thinks it's you, Will and Tem.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:38 pm@Damo:
Both items you have highlighted would imply you believe Hamilton Brian thinks I am scum with Temasek.
However, Hamilton Brian has listed myself and JustWill as his top two suspects, and has not said that he scumreads Temasek.
(I would invite Hamilton Brian, Damo, and anyone else to discuss this).
#1192 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:09 pm
#1193 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:12 pm
We’ve had recent success catching someone on D1, but I don’t think that has anything to do with suspicion directed at you explicitly.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 4:59 pmI think it's a bit odd few people are throwing suspicion my way given how I've pretty much been a non-factor. I think there's probably some reading into who hasn't said much vs. the few who have, but maybe the thrill of catching mafia on Day 1 has stymied that.
#1194 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:14 pm
#1195 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:19 pm
Pinning this in my memory for future games loldamo666 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 11:12 pmYou were never towncore and not particularly scummy but I have a nagging feeling that your bus comment may have been a clever scum deception. I put you at something like 65% town. Need to over 80% to be towncore.
#1196 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:20 pm
Still morning over here, but good afternoon to you at least lol
#1197 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:21 pm
I mean, his style he said many games ago is he won’t be invested in early phases and will do more later. It’s NAI FWIWdamo666 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 11:13 pmChaqa's new style is to lay low to survive until D2 at least.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 6:08 pmMaybe you have been trying to be a non-factor on purpose.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 4:59 pmI think it's a bit odd few people are throwing suspicion my way given how I've pretty much been a non-factor. I think there's probably some reading into who hasn't said much vs. the few who have, but maybe the thrill of catching mafia on Day 1 has stymied that.
#1199 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:23 pm
Maybe it’s just me then.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 12:01 amI checked my vibe to see if it might be true for me that I recall games that I am mafia in, and my teammates, more easily than not. I think I have to disagree with worcej. I don't really recall. I know there was one really bad one where I was with jamie, brain, ghug, and bozo but I really shit the bed. That was the game where I got caught bussing ghug then jumped off at the last minute (definitely a small town guy with a confidence problem). That's it though.
#1200 Post by worcej » Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:37 pm
Ahh, another person falling victim to challenging damo on mathdamo666 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:58 amTone.
I just picked 80% as a round number > 11/14. 90 would've been better. Anyway as you keep pursuing this I think the likelihood you were bussing diminishes.
I am now thinking all 3 mafia were off sweet and I think we should concentrate on this group. The strategy is still sound with one busser.
In fact I would be inclined to vote anyone off sweet who votes for a sweet voter.
Users browsing this forum: Ernst_Brenner