MAfIA 84 - A VERY TENDER THANKSGIVING GAME THREAD

[damo666]

Whoa.
Chronological anomaly klaxon!
Chronological anomaly klaxon!

The GM announced ND was replaced by Bonatogether on Page 13 with 18:45 hrs left to go.

Macca first posted on Page 15 with 17:56 to go.

Macca claims "I thought ND was scum" yet ND replaced out of the game before Macca first participated.

Suspect.

Exactly. Vote her.

You're definitely past five now.

That's why I stopped counting.

[Bonatogether]

ok i have to miss eod then

[ghug]

Exactly. Vote her.

You're definitely past five now.

That's why I stopped counting.

Damo eschews numbers. Town confirmed.

[sweetandcool]

This is a very weird exchange.

It does look weird if you only quote that. Bona's summary is inaccurate.

i mean the basic fact is that you hold the logically inconsistent position of different reads on me and ND (seperating me and him) but voting me on the basis of what ND did (not seperating them). this is not a real thought process

I'll try one last time. You're wrong about the first half.

I thought ND's slot was worth a flip, based on his behavior.

You subbing in does not magically change that.

It's hard to read you personally, so you personally are a null read. But taking into account ND's behavior in your slot I still maintain that I want your slot flipped.

Seriously, if there is a player that I tend to townread, are you claiming I should townread the person they subbed in for, even if that player was an utter scumread. This is nonsense Bona.

[damo666]

Okay, I've been ignoring this Macca drama.

What's going on? I don't understand.

I pointed out an inconsistency between Macca saying they thought ND was scum before Bona subbed in, whilst also Macca's first post was after ND subbed out.

Damo is now behaving like this is an incredible case-closed "gotcha", and Temasek and Heart-throb have jumped on board, which is all a bit weird.

I pointed it out before you. You noticing the same strengthened my read. Join me.

[BunnyGo]

what time is eod

7PM AST (if you're in the Maritimes)
6PM EST
5PM CST
4PM MST
3PM PST

[Bonatogether]

It does look weird if you only quote that. Bona's summary is inaccurate.

i mean the basic fact is that you hold the logically inconsistent position of different reads on me and ND (seperating me and him) but voting me on the basis of what ND did (not seperating them). this is not a real thought process

I'll try one last time. You're wrong about the first half.

I thought ND's slot was worth a flip, based on his behavior.

You subbing in does not magically change that.

It's hard to read you personally, so you personally are a null read. But taking into account ND's behavior in your slot I still maintain that I want your slot flipped.

Seriously, if there is a player that I tend to townread, are you claiming I should townread the person they subbed in for, even if that player was an utter scumread. This is nonsense Bona.

there's not possibly a way to have two reads on one slot. i'm not claiming that you should ignore either me or ND, but whatever your read is, it needs to parse on both players. otherwise your position is not internally consistent. what you have done is produced a read on ND, refused to make a read of me or apply your read of ND to me, but still want to vote the slot.

[sweetandcool]

Okay, I've been ignoring this Macca drama.

What's going on? I don't understand.

I pointed out an inconsistency between Macca saying they thought ND was scum before Bona subbed in, whilst also Macca's first post was after ND subbed out.

Damo is now behaving like this is an incredible case-closed "gotcha", and Temasek and Heart-throb have jumped on board, which is all a bit weird.

Ah, that is interesting.

I guess it depends on Macca's style. Their explanation isn't unreasonable.

[Jamiet99uk]

Okay, I've been ignoring this Macca drama.

What's going on? I don't understand.

I pointed out an inconsistency between Macca saying they thought ND was scum before Bona subbed in, whilst also Macca's first post was after ND subbed out.

Damo is now behaving like this is an incredible case-closed "gotcha", and Temasek and Heart-throb have jumped on board, which is all a bit weird.

I pointed it out before you. You noticing the same strengthened my read. Join me.

Oh. You know what, so you did.

However, noticing the same evidence twice doesn't make it twice as much evidence, it just means the two of us noticed the same thing. I'm not sure it's that damning, it seems quite a small detail.

What did you think of ND before Bonatogomo joined?

[Bonatogether]

what time is eod

7PM AST (if you're in the Maritimes)
6PM EST
5PM CST
4PM MST
3PM PST

thank you bongo

[sweetandcool]

i mean the basic fact is that you hold the logically inconsistent position of different reads on me and ND (seperating me and him) but voting me on the basis of what ND did (not seperating them). this is not a real thought process

I'll try one last time. You're wrong about the first half.

I thought ND's slot was worth a flip, based on his behavior.

You subbing in does not magically change that.

It's hard to read you personally, so you personally are a null read. But taking into account ND's behavior in your slot I still maintain that I want your slot flipped.

Seriously, if there is a player that I tend to townread, are you claiming I should townread the person they subbed in for, even if that player was an utter scumread. This is nonsense Bona.

there's not possibly a way to have two reads on one slot. i'm not claiming that you should ignore either me or ND, but whatever your read is, it needs to parse on both players. otherwise your position is not internally consistent. what you have done is produced a read on ND, refused to make a read of me or apply your read of ND to me, but still want to vote the slot.

Your stubbornness here looks scummy.

The Bona I know would be too cool to care about a vote on him.

[Bonatogether]

I'll try one last time. You're wrong about the first half.

I thought ND's slot was worth a flip, based on his behavior.

You subbing in does not magically change that.

It's hard to read you personally, so you personally are a null read. But taking into account ND's behavior in your slot I still maintain that I want your slot flipped.

Seriously, if there is a player that I tend to townread, are you claiming I should townread the person they subbed in for, even if that player was an utter scumread. This is nonsense Bona.

there's not possibly a way to have two reads on one slot. i'm not claiming that you should ignore either me or ND, but whatever your read is, it needs to parse on both players. otherwise your position is not internally consistent. what you have done is produced a read on ND, refused to make a read of me or apply your read of ND to me, but still want to vote the slot.

Your stubbornness here looks scummy.

The Bona I know would be too cool to care about a vote on him.

any image of me that's not very stubborn is simply wrong

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Huh awfully bold claim 13 pages in, Mr. Rivera.

And yes, i will still be defending myself extremely hard, like last time, so come at me

I have seen more then once scum joking about being scum and you are fully capable of doing this.

This said, defending yourself as either town or scum is what I expect for any decent player, so let's see.

Don’t worry, his ״defense״ was to say he’d offer a vigorous defense and then made more “jokes” that he’s mafia.

I don’t think I’ll be changing my vote today.

Dang guys can a man not lighten the mood
I am quite the jokester regardless of alignment :)

[damo666]

I pointed out an inconsistency between Macca saying they thought ND was scum before Bona subbed in, whilst also Macca's first post was after ND subbed out.

Damo is now behaving like this is an incredible case-closed "gotcha", and Temasek and Heart-throb have jumped on board, which is all a bit weird.

I pointed it out before you. You noticing the same strengthened my read. Join me.

Oh. You know what, so you did.

However, noticing the same evidence twice doesn't make it twice as much evidence, it just means the two of us noticed the same thing. I'm not sure it's that damning, it seems quite a small detail.

What did you think of ND before Bonatogomo joined?

I didn't notice anything scummy or unNDlike so dunno

[Jamiet99uk]

there's not possibly a way to have two reads on one slot. i'm not claiming that you should ignore either me or ND, but whatever your read is, it needs to parse on both players. otherwise your position is not internally consistent. what you have done is produced a read on ND, refused to make a read of me or apply your read of ND to me, but still want to vote the slot.

Your stubbornness here looks scummy.

The Bona I know would be too cool to care about a vote on him.

Bona is stubborn a lot of the time, I think this is wrong.

[damo666]

I think 2 people noticing the same thing makes the evidence more significant.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Sweet must be the substitute teacher that is trying to get involved in the fight and gets told off by the popular girl

this analogy is stupid

I didn't consult the resident Gen X'ers to keep it fresh.

Gen Z for the win. All you crusty musty dusty lameO fanum pasties need to chillax

[Bonatogether]

this analogy is stupid

I didn't consult the resident Gen X'ers to keep it fresh.

Gen Z for the win. All you crusty musty dusty lameO fanum pasties need to chillax

literally

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

he said my shitposts count so i can stay winning

glad I've got you as a partner in mafia and not that loose cannon ND. Will be much easier now

[sweetandcool]

there's not possibly a way to have two reads on one slot. i'm not claiming that you should ignore either me or ND, but whatever your read is, it needs to parse on both players. otherwise your position is not internally consistent. what you have done is produced a read on ND, refused to make a read of me or apply your read of ND to me, but still want to vote the slot.

Your stubbornness here looks scummy.

The Bona I know would be too cool to care about a vote on him.

Bona is stubborn a lot of the time, I think this is wrong.

Bad word choice.

I just mean I think it's weird that he is so bothered by my vote.

Either way, I'm tired of explaining it to Bona. If other people don't get it then I guess I'll have to try again. But it makes sense to me.