MAfIA 84 - A VERY TENDER THANKSGIVING GAME THREAD

[sweetandcool]

Did this bug anyone else?

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

If you’re going to lecture me at least do it in mafia chat

Glad to have you back Will. You played well last game. Maybe this game you won't newbie-stumble as much.

So who are your other teammates, other than Ham?

I started to have a feeling that Will might be scum this game.

Huh awfully bold claim 13 pages in, Mr. Rivera.

And yes, i will still be defending myself extremely hard, like last time, so come at me

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

So far I scumread worcej and ND. Why? Worcej and ND have been playing really weirdly comparatively to the last game. Especially ND. He completely dipped after we pointed out his unusual actions.

What's different about worcej to you?

I’m not actually entirely sure, whenever I meet someone new I kind of store a version of them in my head, and whenever someone deviates from said version I can kind of sense it.

Call it a stupid gut feeling but somethings just off with Worcej

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Also, ##VOTE Bona

I've decided that ND (Bona) could be scum.

ND's strategy actually halfway worked last time as Mafia. Several people townread him for his antics. So I'm thinking this game he decided to resurrect that strategy, banking on the fact that people would assume he wouldn't be so obvious about using his previous scum-strategy, and therefore would townread him.

This is like 3 meta layers deep. Would be funny if Bona dies immediately after subbing in. However my original assessment on NDs sudden dissapearamce has been thrown out the (car) window. So I have no real evidence on anyone anymore, except a gut feeling that its worcej

[sweetandcool]

Glad to have you back Will. You played well last game. Maybe this game you won't newbie-stumble as much.

So who are your other teammates, other than Ham?

I started to have a feeling that Will might be scum this game.

Huh awfully bold claim 13 pages in, Mr. Rivera.

And yes, i will still be defending myself extremely hard, like last time, so come at me

One thing I've learned is that you don't really have to respond to stuff like this, Will.

Rdr didn't even give a vague reason for it (though the quoted text implies it was because of your jokes).

We all know you were joking, or possibly, "joking".

Reserve defense for actual accusations, and focus on hunting or whatever.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Also sorry about your car troubles ND. I am filled with uncontrollable rage whenever those funny lights show up on my dash

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

I started to have a feeling that Will might be scum this game.

Huh awfully bold claim 13 pages in, Mr. Rivera.

And yes, i will still be defending myself extremely hard, like last time, so come at me

One thing I've learned is that you don't really have to respond to stuff like this, Will.

Rdr didn't even give a vague reason for it (though the quoted text implies it was because of your jokes).

We all know you were joking, or possibly, "joking".

Reserve defense for actual accusations, and focus on hunting or whatever.

By this, I am trying to disprove any false allegations of my mafianess, which is probably why I lost the game last time. I will still be anvery active defender of myself, although i will indeed heel until Rivera comes up with a real accusation.

Still, doesnt it strike you as weird he didnt provide a reason?

[sweetandcool]

Also, ##VOTE Bona

I've decided that ND (Bona) could be scum.

ND's strategy actually halfway worked last time as Mafia. Several people townread him for his antics. So I'm thinking this game he decided to resurrect that strategy, banking on the fact that people would assume he wouldn't be so obvious about using his previous scum-strategy, and therefore would townread him.

This is like 3 meta layers deep. Would be funny if Bona dies immediately after subbing in. However my original assessment on NDs sudden dissapearamce has been thrown out the (car) window. So I have no real evidence on anyone anymore, except a gut feeling that its worcej

It's all a WIFOM, I'm not convicted, but it's enough to want to flip them D1. ND was an easy townread last game (and not just because of his deathtunnel on you) and switching back to his scum persona creates a WIFOM that really bothers me.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Also, ##VOTE Bona

I've decided that ND (Bona) could be scum.

ND's strategy actually halfway worked last time as Mafia. Several people townread him for his antics. So I'm thinking this game he decided to resurrect that strategy, banking on the fact that people would assume he wouldn't be so obvious about using his previous scum-strategy, and therefore would townread him.

This is like 3 meta layers deep. Would be funny if Bona dies immediately after subbing in. However my original assessment on NDs sudden dissapearamce has been thrown out the (car) window. So I have no real evidence on anyone anymore, except a gut feeling that its worcej

It's all a WIFOM, I'm not convicted, but it's enough to want to flip them D1. ND was an easy townread last game (and not just because of his deathtunnel on you) and switching back to his scum persona creates a WIFOM that really bothers me.

Whats WIFOM?

[sweetandcool]

Huh awfully bold claim 13 pages in, Mr. Rivera.

And yes, i will still be defending myself extremely hard, like last time, so come at me

One thing I've learned is that you don't really have to respond to stuff like this, Will.

Rdr didn't even give a vague reason for it (though the quoted text implies it was because of your jokes).

We all know you were joking, or possibly, "joking".

Reserve defense for actual accusations, and focus on hunting or whatever.

By this, I am trying to disprove any false allegations of my mafianess, which is probably why I lost the game last time. I will still be anvery active defender of myself, although i will indeed heel until Rivera comes up with a real accusation.

Still, doesnt it strike you as weird he didnt provide a reason?

It would strike me as weird if it was my first or second game. People just do that. Or throw naked votes around. There is a method to the madness, but it's not my method. Being excessively defensive can make you seem a bit more scummy, but it depends on context I guess.

I prefer to just have faith people assess my alignment properly :D

[Bonatogether]

Thanks for subbing in Bona, how come you didn't originally sign up?

I'm a bit cross with you and Kak because if you signed up we could have had a friendly neighbor. I dream to be FN some day <\3

i hate it here

[sweetandcool]

This is like 3 meta layers deep. Would be funny if Bona dies immediately after subbing in. However my original assessment on NDs sudden dissapearamce has been thrown out the (car) window. So I have no real evidence on anyone anymore, except a gut feeling that its worcej

It's all a WIFOM, I'm not convicted, but it's enough to want to flip them D1. ND was an easy townread last game (and not just because of his deathtunnel on you) and switching back to his scum persona creates a WIFOM that really bothers me.

Whats WIFOM?

Wine in front of me. Basically, you can dig many layers deep with your logic. And it all amounts to a coin flip. The reference comes from the Princess Bride movie, and the wine in front of me scene is a great example of this principle in action.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

One thing I've learned is that you don't really have to respond to stuff like this, Will.

Rdr didn't even give a vague reason for it (though the quoted text implies it was because of your jokes).

We all know you were joking, or possibly, "joking".

Reserve defense for actual accusations, and focus on hunting or whatever.

By this, I am trying to disprove any false allegations of my mafianess, which is probably why I lost the game last time. I will still be anvery active defender of myself, although i will indeed heel until Rivera comes up with a real accusation.

Still, doesnt it strike you as weird he didnt provide a reason?

It would strike me as weird if it was my first or second game. People just do that. Or throw naked votes around. There is a method to the madness, but it's not my method. Being excessively defensive can make you seem a bit more scummy, but it depends on context I guess.

I prefer to just have faith people assess my alignment properly :D

I hereby declare that if anyone makes a serious accusation against me, I will always defend myself very hard, no matter what the role

[Bonatogether]

Roster

1. JustAGuyNamedWill
2. ghug
3. sweetandcool
4. Damo666
5.Jamiet99uk
6. Hamilton Brian
7. ND
8. worcej
(6)9. Chaqa
10. Macca573
11. SpiritoftheRadio
12. Rdrivera2005
13. BunnyGo
14. heartthrob24909
15. Temasek22
16. bozo

my good friend bozo is on this list

[ghug]

Seems weird you'd forget a scum partner. I find it significantly easier to remember players based off scum games I've had with them.

I don't think it's that weird.

ghug being contrary to my thought process in a game?

Shocked I tell you!

Who are you?

[ghug]

i haven't read the roles and i don't plan to

##vote ghug

##VOTE bona

[Bonatogether]

BunnyGo
heartthrob24909
Temasek22
Chaqa

i have not played with any of you before, so I look forward to playing with you

bongo is in this game? that's wild

[Bonatogether]

i haven't read the roles and i don't plan to

##vote ghug

##VOTE bona

reported to jmo

[Bonatogether]

Thank god no one is talking about their stupid personal lives. Literally no one cares about it.

haha that's so goofy past me

[ghug]

Did this bug anyone else?

Did you notice me voting for him?