No.
Yes. In fact, I own a (translated, of course) copy of something he wrote. Very good question.
Twenty questions: the gross round
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Scientist, philosopher, or person primarily involved in the gaining of knowledge?
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
-
Hanging Rook
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:22 pm
- Contact:
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
No. ("Ancient" is a bit subjective - we know this person died before 1600 - so I am using 476 AD as a cutoff. He did not live in the pre-476 Roman Republic/Empire.)
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
-
Octavious
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:16 pm
- Location: The Five Valleys, Gloucestershire
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Mondino de Luzzi?
I eat cookies to improve my snacking experience
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
-
Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Spartaculous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 3:13 pmNo. ("Ancient" is a bit subjective - we know this person died before 1600 - so I am using 476 AD as a cutoff. He did not live in the pre-476 Roman Republic/Empire.)
Also, "Romance languages" weren't really a thing back then.
-
Hanging Rook
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:22 pm
- Contact:
-
Hanging Rook
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Maybe you would, but it's not part of the generally agreed upon definition. If the answer turned out to be someone who only spoke Latin, I would complain about the inaccurate answer to that question.
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
What I meant here was a flag made official by the government of the nation, rather than someone's piece of cloth they like to wave around.Octavious wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 12:42 pmIn a bit of a grump this morning, old chap? I don't recall that particular response being favoured in any of the Blackadder scripts. I confess to hoping for something a bit more creative, or at the very least a recognition of the implication that I haven't the foggiest idea what a standardised flag is either
Presuming that Spartaculous and I interpret that the same way, that means that we're looking at a significant country from no earlier than around 1100.
-
Spartaculous
- Posts: 3422
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:43 am
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Some comments, clarifications, clues, and corrections.
1. Not Luigi Galvani. (Note he died after 1600.)
2. I was using a definition of Romance languages that excluded Latin. Most of what this person wrote was in Latin (unsurprisingly, given the time period he lived in). But, I feel confident in saying that he also spoke a language that is commonly accepted to be a Romance language, especially given that one of his minor written works is in this Romance language.
3. A closer look at his list of publications shows that he actually did write a volume on a topic that would unquestionably fall under what I would call "the arts", broadly defined, so I guess I need to correct my answer to Q8. But, I also need to emphasize that this is a very minor work compared to everything else he did and is known for. The person's Wikipedia page doesn't mention his work in this particular artistic field in the main body of text - only in the long list of works at the bottom of the page.
4. I definitely found a picture of the flag of the nation-state he was born in (for the appropriate year) on Wikipedia, and it seems clear that the flag is representing the nation-state itself (rather than being a personal flag of the ruler of the state). Again, European political borders were somewhat fluid at the time period we are discussing, due to wars and things like that, but I will stand by my answer to Q6.
5. I personally have no intellectual interest in medicine, anatomy, or physiology.
1. Not Luigi Galvani. (Note he died after 1600.)
2. I was using a definition of Romance languages that excluded Latin. Most of what this person wrote was in Latin (unsurprisingly, given the time period he lived in). But, I feel confident in saying that he also spoke a language that is commonly accepted to be a Romance language, especially given that one of his minor written works is in this Romance language.
3. A closer look at his list of publications shows that he actually did write a volume on a topic that would unquestionably fall under what I would call "the arts", broadly defined, so I guess I need to correct my answer to Q8. But, I also need to emphasize that this is a very minor work compared to everything else he did and is known for. The person's Wikipedia page doesn't mention his work in this particular artistic field in the main body of text - only in the long list of works at the bottom of the page.
4. I definitely found a picture of the flag of the nation-state he was born in (for the appropriate year) on Wikipedia, and it seems clear that the flag is representing the nation-state itself (rather than being a personal flag of the ruler of the state). Again, European political borders were somewhat fluid at the time period we are discussing, due to wars and things like that, but I will stand by my answer to Q6.
5. I personally have no intellectual interest in medicine, anatomy, or physiology.
-
Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
1. Real dead human man.
2. Born before 1st Jan 1800
3. Not born in Asia, Africa, South America, or any island nation except the current UK or Ireland.
4. Not aristocratic.
5. Not a native speaker of a Germanic language.
6. Born in a "country" with a standardised flag.
7. Speaker of a romance language.
8. He did something that he thought was art but most people now would not classify it as "the arts".
9. Died before 1599.
10. Published writer.
11. Scientist, philosopher, or person primarily involved in the gaining of knowledge.
12. Not an ancient Roman.
13. A practitioner of medicine.
NOT
Niccolò Machiavelli
Mondino de Luzzi
Luigi Galvani
2. Born before 1st Jan 1800
3. Not born in Asia, Africa, South America, or any island nation except the current UK or Ireland.
4. Not aristocratic.
5. Not a native speaker of a Germanic language.
6. Born in a "country" with a standardised flag.
7. Speaker of a romance language.
8. He did something that he thought was art but most people now would not classify it as "the arts".
9. Died before 1599.
10. Published writer.
11. Scientist, philosopher, or person primarily involved in the gaining of knowledge.
12. Not an ancient Roman.
13. A practitioner of medicine.
NOT
Niccolò Machiavelli
Mondino de Luzzi
Luigi Galvani
Potato, potato; potato.
-
Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Twenty questions: the gross round
Did he ever live in the territory we now know as "Italy" ?
Potato, potato; potato.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hominidae