M1026: ghughog Day [Game Thread]

[Jamiet99uk]

@Brainbomb:
If you are town, please do not quote the complete works of Ernest Hemingway.

[brainbomb]

@Jamie,
What would your opinion have been if I had ignored worcejs point by point case on me?

[Jamiet99uk]

@Jamie,
What would your opinion have been if I had ignored worcejs point by point case on me?

I would find that both surprising and NAI.

You find it very hard as any alignment to ignore people talking about you. Although, to some degree, that's only natural.

[Jamiet99uk]

My scum pool is:

Sweetandcool >>> Damo >>> Hamilton Brian >>> Worcej.

[brainbomb]

@Jamie,
What would your opinion have been if I had ignored worcejs point by point case on me?

I would find that both surprising and NAI.

You find it very hard as any alignment to ignore people talking about you. Although, to some degree, that's only natural.

This seems like you arent aware of how you think.
Usually when someone ignores a case, or a question, or a talking point you accuse the person ignoring it of being scummy. You are generally intolerant of failure to adhere to reply when someone is directly challenged.

[Jamiet99uk]

Hamilton Brian has been very under-the-radar today and that is triggering me slightly.

[brainbomb]

I am pretty surprised to see both how unlikely you think it is for worcej to be mafia. can you explain that a bit?

[Jamiet99uk]

@Jamie,
What would your opinion have been if I had ignored worcejs point by point case on me?

I would find that both surprising and NAI.

You find it very hard as any alignment to ignore people talking about you. Although, to some degree, that's only natural.

This seems like you arent aware of how you think.
Usually when someone ignores a case, or a question, or a talking point you accuse the person ignoring it of being scummy. You are generally intolerant of failure to adhere to reply when someone is directly challenged.

Yes but I don't think you would do it. As any alignment.

I can't think of a game where someone was presenting a big old case on you and you just ignored them completely. It would be out of character for you, more than it would be alignment indicative.

[Jamiet99uk]

I am pretty surprised to see both how unlikely you think it is for worcej to be mafia. can you explain that a bit?

Both how unlikely I think it is, and what?

[damo666]

Anyways, good work Bozo, I have been seemingly inconsistent, but every post so far has been completely sincere.

Can anyone explain why worcej and not damo?

I am driving home today and will only be able to even check the thread this morning. After that it is unlikely I'll have time to do anything.

While it is not impossible that damo was trying to save ND by seeing if he could get HB or Jamie DKed, his vote change from Jamie to HB at 4 minutes put ND in the lead, and if his switch back to Jamie was a cross post, which seems likely, then he was also voting to break the tie. Therefore, I would put damo is the group of possible bussers instead of in the group of those who did not participate in DKing ND, which is you and worcej.

Blimey! I never voted ND but I'm a busser!!

Don't bother replying Bozo, I understand what you are saying. Just found it amusing.

[brainbomb]

Bad grammar. I meant, the doctor claim, and reveal the person they saved.

I don't buy this answer.

You said:

"would it be appropriate for doctor and person they saved to claim?"

"doctor" AND "the person they saved"

That's two people, and you knew it.

Nope, I wrote poorly. I'm sorry to disappoint you.

can you re write it the way you meant to write it? because this looks like you understood, and then also wanted to use it to feign ignorance.

[brainbomb]

I would find that both surprising and NAI.

You find it very hard as any alignment to ignore people talking about you. Although, to some degree, that's only natural.

This seems like you arent aware of how you think.
Usually when someone ignores a case, or a question, or a talking point you accuse the person ignoring it of being scummy. You are generally intolerant of failure to adhere to reply when someone is directly challenged.

Yes but I don't think you would do it. As any alignment.

I can't think of a game where someone was presenting a big old case on you and you just ignored them completely. It would be out of character for you, more than it would be alignment indicative.

youve probably attacked me in 40 games for not answering a question up to this point. come on man

[damo666]

My scum pool is:

Sweetandcool >>> Damo >>> Hamilton Brian >>> Worcej.

What?

[Jamiet99uk]

This seems like you arent aware of how you think.
Usually when someone ignores a case, or a question, or a talking point you accuse the person ignoring it of being scummy. You are generally intolerant of failure to adhere to reply when someone is directly challenged.

Yes but I don't think you would do it. As any alignment.

I can't think of a game where someone was presenting a big old case on you and you just ignored them completely. It would be out of character for you, more than it would be alignment indicative.

youve probably attacked me in 40 games for not answering a question up to this point. come on man

Not answering one specific question, and completely ignoring someone making a case against you in multiple posts, are two different things.

Anyway, why are you pressing this point so hard? I am not scumreading you. Would you like me to scumread you? Would that make you feel better?

[Jamiet99uk]

My scum pool is:

Sweetandcool >>> Damo >>> Hamilton Brian >>> Worcej.

What?

I said my scum pool is:

Sweetandcool

then

Damo666

then

Hamilton Brian

then

Worcej.

Does that read better for you?

[brainbomb]

Yes but I don't think you would do it. As any alignment.

I can't think of a game where someone was presenting a big old case on you and you just ignored them completely. It would be out of character for you, more than it would be alignment indicative.

youve probably attacked me in 40 games for not answering a question up to this point. come on man

Not answering one specific question, and completely ignoring someone making a case against you in multiple posts, are two different things.

Anyway, why are you pressing this point so hard? I am not scumreading you. Would you like me to scumread you? Would that make you feel better?

no I just wanted to argue with you. I like winning debates

[Jamiet99uk]

youve probably attacked me in 40 games for not answering a question up to this point. come on man

Not answering one specific question, and completely ignoring someone making a case against you in multiple posts, are two different things.

Anyway, why are you pressing this point so hard? I am not scumreading you. Would you like me to scumread you? Would that make you feel better?

no I just wanted to argue with you. I like winning debates

Okay, but let's reframe your question.

What would your opinion have been if Worcej had ignored the cases on him being made by Damo and Bozo and yourself?

[damo666]

My scum pool is:

Sweetandcool >>> Damo >>> Hamilton Brian >>> Worcej.

What?

I said my scum pool is:

Sweetandcool

then

Damo666

then

Hamilton Brian

then

Worcej.

Does that read better for you?

No Sweet>>>worcej>>>brain is much betterer

[Jamiet99uk]

No Sweet>>>worcej>>>brain is a vast improvement on what you have purported.

Why do you townread Hamilton Brian, and for what reasons?

[worcej]

Not answering one specific question, and completely ignoring someone making a case against you in multiple posts, are two different things.

Anyway, why are you pressing this point so hard? I am not scumreading you. Would you like me to scumread you? Would that make you feel better?

no I just wanted to argue with you. I like winning debates

Okay, but let's reframe your question.

What would your opinion have been if Worcej had ignored the cases on him being made by Damo and Bozo and yourself?

Now this is a good question