M1026: ghughog Day [Game Thread]

[ND]

In my opinion, with no real information to go on D1, 2 mafia out of 8 players should be successful in preventing a mafia DK at least 90% of the time. Therefore, I suggest we use a real time random event to select the DK, giving us approximately a 25% chance of DKing a mafia D1, not accounting for doctor claims.

What do you mean, a "Real time random event" ?

Wow! A real deductive question from Jam. I'm surprised.

[ND]

In my opinion, with no real information to go on D1, 2 mafia out of 8 players should be successful in preventing a mafia DK at least 90% of the time. Therefore, I suggest we use a real time random event to select the DK, giving us approximately a 25% chance of DKing a mafia D1, not accounting for doctor claims.

What do you mean, a "Real time random event" ?

Something like a lottery drawing.

dumb

[ND]

No, I object to that!

Do you think you can do better than 25% in identify mafia and getting them DKed D1?

I mean you can actually read the game and ask questions instead of coming up with a crackpot, hair-brained 'lottery drawing' lol

[brainbomb]

why are you like this?

[ND]

let me also add that we are essentially a day in and there is what two people who haven't posted yet? Crazy.

Who was the other when you posted this?

I posted a question mark because I was unsure. I guess with your post everyone has now posted.

[ND]

why are you like this?

I'll respond to you soon enough.

[brainbomb]

sure put me down for a 3 o clock

[ND]

@Brainburp

I'll start with your commentary on the 'Bozo' plan because that plan is something that a literal bozo would come up with. It's really not that interesting at all. It's just lazy. Point in fact, it's just bad. Full stop. And you hedge your language on this. Paraphrasing you, 'Oh well, gee, it's interesting if there are no quality game solvers to get behind.' -Everyone is capable of solving the game. I would expect nothing less for anyone who signs up to play a game where deductive reasoning is a key component of the game. Jesus. And, then you give this long litany of shorthand meta-analysis on people in the game. I guess to determine, if based on your meta read, if anyone is capable of fulfilling your arbitrary definition of a 'quality' game solver. And, you people call me insulting. Btw I am good but given that I am talking to myself half the time idk what that really accomplishes. I guess I'll get better at talking to myself.

Everyone has the potential and ability to read a post and make a conclusion based on what they are able to reason. Regarding me. I plan uninhibited. Have for years. I call it like I see it. Hate me for it. I don't care. What I have a conclusion, then I'll share it. And, lastly, for your gut read about Jam and myself. It's almost as big of a crackpot, hair-brained, theory as Bozo's lottery suggestion.

[sweetandcool]

Rest of the page is interesting. We have Jam and Ham playing to the meta and riffing off their simplistic and humorless posts from yesterday night. They both contributed next to nothing yesterday so there is only so long they can riff off each other before they run out of re-run content. Thank God almighty for that one. Continues the theme of Jam = Ham though.

Next. Brain makes some random post about Ham. And then Ham votes for Slippery because Slippery is on a vacation. It was probably Ham’s funniest post to date though but he just copied Damo so no credit. Important factor is Slippery voted for Brain and parroted my logic about Brain because it is undeniable with anyone more than one brain cell that Brain is extremely divorced from this game.

Honestly I was just trying to provoke a reaction. Brain omb and I tend to spar and I was hoping for something from them.

Right now Ham actually seems most suspicious to me. Not sure what to make of ND.

[sweetandcool]

No, I object to that!

Do you think you can do better than 25% in identify mafia and getting them DKed D1?

Assume I'm town, and if you are town then randomly voting for someone else gives 50%, which is a lot more exciting that 25%.

[ND]

Rest of the page is interesting. We have Jam and Ham playing to the meta and riffing off their simplistic and humorless posts from yesterday night. They both contributed next to nothing yesterday so there is only so long they can riff off each other before they run out of re-run content. Thank God almighty for that one. Continues the theme of Jam = Ham though.

Next. Brain makes some random post about Ham. And then Ham votes for Slippery because Slippery is on a vacation. It was probably Ham’s funniest post to date though but he just copied Damo so no credit. Important factor is Slippery voted for Brain and parroted my logic about Brain because it is undeniable with anyone more than one brain cell that Brain is extremely divorced from this game.

Honestly I was just trying to provoke a reaction. Brain omb and I tend to spar and I was hoping for something from them.

Right now Ham actually seems most suspicious to me. Not sure what to make of ND.

Interesting. And what did this reaction tell you? Mentioning you are giving a reaction test is meaningless if you don't have any substance.

[worcej]

Worcej's contributions so far:

1. "Oh hey this started".

2. "Fuck Canada and everyone in it, lol".

At least that isn't the lowest contribution?

[worcej]

Hey, what's with the change of the game name?

So, I'd be inclined to drop a vote on worcej for outright making light of genocide.

I'd drop a vote on ND for churlishness.

SO what's everyone been up to while we've been waiting for this gem to start for the past 2 months?

Meh, genocide is just a human right of passage.

[worcej]

like already no one talks and now the few people who do are just going to repost themselves??

People need to fill a vacuum of sound sometimes?

[worcej]

every post ND is on the verge of forcing a narrative and then he just steps out of the batters box after he aims to left field and claims hes about to hit a homerun. then he doesnt.

He's the least likely scum imho

[worcej]

everyone else has been pretty unforced and mostly carefree.

bozo plan is interesting in a game where there are no quality game solvers to get behind. although I think Jamie and worcej have these skills, and damo does when he gives a shit. bozo never does day one. sweet can do it but has out of game commitments to focus on. and then ND is probably capable of game solving as he is an academic with a PHD. he just doesnt do a good job of relating to others so towns like to turn on him early for his abrasive superiority complex

I take this as a compliment. Thanks BB.

[worcej]

everyone else has been pretty unforced and mostly carefree.

bozo plan is interesting in a game where there are no quality game solvers to get behind. although I think Jamie and worcej have these skills, and damo does when he gives a shit. bozo never does day one. sweet can do it but has out of game commitments to focus on. and then ND is probably capable of game solving as he is an academic with a PHD. he just doesnt do a good job of relating to others so towns like to turn on him early for his abrasive superiority complex

I don't think there is typically much to solve D1, unless a mafia member makes a mistake.

Valid truthfully - I don't really feel bad about going off meta on D1 unless something drastic happens like an obvious slip.

[worcej]

@Brainburp

I'll start with your commentary on the 'Bozo' plan because that plan is something that a literal bozo would come up with. It's really not that interesting at all. It's just lazy. Point in fact, it's just bad. Full stop. And you hedge your language on this. Paraphrasing you, 'Oh well, gee, it's interesting if there are no quality game solvers to get behind.' -Everyone is capable of solving the game. I would expect nothing less for anyone who signs up to play a game where deductive reasoning is a key component of the game. Jesus. And, then you give this long litany of shorthand meta-analysis on people in the game. I guess to determine, if based on your meta read, if anyone is capable of fulfilling your arbitrary definition of a 'quality' game solver. And, you people call me insulting. Btw I am good but given that I am talking to myself half the time idk what that really accomplishes. I guess I'll get better at talking to myself.

Everyone has the potential and ability to read a post and make a conclusion based on what they are able to reason. Regarding me. I plan uninhibited. Have for years. I call it like I see it. Hate me for it. I don't care. What I have a conclusion, then I'll share it. And, lastly, for your gut read about Jam and myself. It's almost as big of a crackpot, hair-brained, theory as Bozo's lottery suggestion.

I missed your style.

Truthfully, it's refreshing to see someone stick to their guns and call it as it is.

[worcej]

Rest of the page is interesting. We have Jam and Ham playing to the meta and riffing off their simplistic and humorless posts from yesterday night. They both contributed next to nothing yesterday so there is only so long they can riff off each other before they run out of re-run content. Thank God almighty for that one. Continues the theme of Jam = Ham though.

Next. Brain makes some random post about Ham. And then Ham votes for Slippery because Slippery is on a vacation. It was probably Ham’s funniest post to date though but he just copied Damo so no credit. Important factor is Slippery voted for Brain and parroted my logic about Brain because it is undeniable with anyone more than one brain cell that Brain is extremely divorced from this game.

Honestly I was just trying to provoke a reaction. Brain omb and I tend to spar and I was hoping for something from them.

Right now Ham actually seems most suspicious to me. Not sure what to make of ND.

Ham's desire to vote me for a poor tasting joke and ND for being ND was the low effort. The shadow vote excuse was also meh too... but we're not in serious vote mode yet.

[sweetandcool]

Rest of the page is interesting. We have Jam and Ham playing to the meta and riffing off their simplistic and humorless posts from yesterday night. They both contributed next to nothing yesterday so there is only so long they can riff off each other before they run out of re-run content. Thank God almighty for that one. Continues the theme of Jam = Ham though.

Next. Brain makes some random post about Ham. And then Ham votes for Slippery because Slippery is on a vacation. It was probably Ham’s funniest post to date though but he just copied Damo so no credit. Important factor is Slippery voted for Brain and parroted my logic about Brain because it is undeniable with anyone more than one brain cell that Brain is extremely divorced from this game.

Honestly I was just trying to provoke a reaction. Brain omb and I tend to spar and I was hoping for something from them.

Right now Ham actually seems most suspicious to me. Not sure what to make of ND.

Interesting. And what did this reaction tell you? Mentioning you are giving a reaction test is meaningless if you don't have any substance.

I didn't receive a reaction from them or anyone else, so it doesn't tell me much. I guess it makes brainbomb slightly safer, since there is a chance a teammate of theirs would attempt to deflect attention from brain.

Maybe damo or whoever else voted for me? Meh.