20 Questions - 6 Score and Akker - Multiball Madness

[Octavious]

Perhaps you would like to quote the answer I've supposedly given incorrectly?

[Jamiet99uk]

Fuck it. No. You know what? I don't care about this game anymore. I'll be back in a few weeks.

This "multi-ball" shit is not interesting, it's simply confusing.

Good luck.

[Octavious]

What's happened, Jamie, is that damo has posted misinformation to gain an advantage over the opposition. In doing so he not only managed to out-guess you, but has now caused you to make this rather silly accusation, and instead of making a simple apology and moving on like a normal person you've run off in a huff.

You are really quite amusing at 3 in the morning

[Jamiet99uk]

What's happened, Jamie, is that damo has posted misinformation to gain an advantage over the opposition. In doing so he not only managed to out-guess you, but has now caused you to make this rather silly accusation, and instead of making a simple apology and moving on like a normal person you've run off in a huff.

You are really quite amusing at 3 in the morning

I like to participate in this as a guessing game.

I don't like to participate in it as a game of four-dimensional liar's chess.

I'm out.

[Octavious]

But you were the first person to attempt to lie

[Octavious]

The question master does not lie, obviously, but I have no control over the rest of you

[BrianBaru]

“Perhaps you would like to quote the answer I've supposedly given incorrectly?”
“17. Died a natural death”
Sweet Fanny Adams was murdered

[Octavious]

“Perhaps you would like to quote the answer I've supposedly given incorrectly?”
“17. Died a natural death”
Sweet Fanny Adams was murdered

Yes... But I didn't write that, did I?

The person who did write that happens to be (entirely coincidentally, I'm sure) the person who is currently winning

[BrianBaru]

Point taken. You did respond "No" to dying a natural death

[Jamiet99uk]

But you were the first person to attempt to lie

No I didn't.

[Octavious]

But you were the first person to attempt to lie

No I didn't.

Yes you did, back in post 32. And when I attempted to draw attention to it you got rather upperty so I didn't push the point too strongly. After all there's no rule that requires you to be honest and you're perfectly entitled to cause as much confusion as you wish.

The baton was passed to han-shahanshah who pushed things to new heights in post 82, but I believe that was done primarily to get info out of me than to confuse his rivals, and even if the latter I felt it was going a little bit further than I could let him get away with.

But it was damo666's lie in post 100 that seems to have caused all of this confusion and made you all thoroughly overexcited. If it was an error it was unfortunate, and if it was intentional it was an act of genius. I didn't notice it, so couldn't have done anything about it regardless.

I have not lied, have attempted to be as clear as I can with answers, and peppered this thread with enough clues to sink a battleship. I admit to being somewhat irritated by this latest nonsense. The aim of the game is to guess, not beat the question master with whatever stick happens to be at hand. If you don't want to play, don't. If you want the game to be over just ask a couple more questions and within a day it will be, either with damo666 as the winner or someone else who has picked up on the clues and guessed. The levers are all within your hands.

[Jamiet99uk]

But you were the first person to attempt to lie

No I didn't.

Yes you did, back in post 32.

Not sure what you're talking about. I didn't do anything in that post that was a deliberate attempt to lie.

[damo666]

No I didn't.

Yes you did, back in post 32.

Not sure what you're talking about. I didn't do anything in that post that was a deliberate attempt to lie.

From post 33 I guess he's referring to C10 which I why I changed it in post 58.

I could be wrong, it could be something else.

[damo666]

But you were the first person to attempt to lie

No I didn't.

Yes you did, back in post 32. And when I attempted to draw attention to it you got rather upperty so I didn't push the point too strongly. After all there's no rule that requires you to be honest and you're perfectly entitled to cause as much confusion as you wish.

The baton was passed to han-shahanshah who pushed things to new heights in post 82, but I believe that was done primarily to get info out of me than to confuse his rivals, and even if the latter I felt it was going a little bit further than I could let him get away with.

But it was damo666's lie in post 100 that seems to have caused all of this confusion and made you all thoroughly overexcited. If it was an error it was unfortunate, and if it was intentional it was an act of genius. I didn't notice it, so couldn't have done anything about it regardless.

I have not lied, have attempted to be as clear as I can with answers, and peppered this thread with enough clues to sink a battleship. I admit to being somewhat irritated by this latest nonsense. The aim of the game is to guess, not beat the question master with whatever stick happens to be at hand. If you don't want to play, don't. If you want the game to be over just ask a couple more questions and within a day it will be, either with damo666 as the winner or someone else who has picked up on the clues and guessed. The levers are all within your hands.

It was an error. I forgot to change it after cut and paste. I had it in my head when he easing FA though.

[damo666]

As to the connection I think we t might be one of these (this is not a question, just musing)

All have initials FA
or more generally Fvowel
or more generally consonantvowel

or (and this is my current favourite) all surnames are of the format forename+s eg Williams Richards Johns etc.

[damo666]

he easing = guessing

[Octavious]

It was an error. I forgot to change it after cut and paste. I had it in my head when he easing FA though.

The mark of a good diplomacy player is that their "errors" have a habit of being profitable

From post 33 I guess he's referring to C10 which I why I changed it in post 58.

And this is why certain people are at the top of the leader board

As to the connection I think we t might be one of these (this is not a question, just musing)

All have initials FA
or more generally Fvowel
or more generally consonantvowel

or (and this is my current favourite) all surnames are of the format forename+s eg Williams Richards Johns etc.

Some interesting ideas, but the idea that the connection would be quite as general as consonant vowel is almost insulting

[han-shahanshah]

What sticks out to me is that you had considered John Hancock as a person. How John Hancock and Fanny Adams are connected I can’t begin to imagine.

[Spartaculous]

Andrew Johnson.

[han-shahanshah]

He can’t be either A or B, he was a US citizen his whole life.