M81: A Night To Remember [GAME THREAD]

[worcej]

Im gonna go with my case on Ezio and just stop overthinking.

##vote ezio

and then RHK next.

that is all.

@brain please consider ghug/aaro. I think they're caught.

Can you explain how you believe they're caught - I don't see the logic.

[damo666]

Oh, this looks interesting.

Yes, I may have caught him in a scumslip. But that would mean both ghug and aaro are scum. Mmmm.

##vote aaro

Who did you catch in a scum slip?

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

[Jamiet99uk]

Look at his D1 and tell me you don't see a shit ton of inconsequential questions.

Explain how me reacting more to Chaqa's memes would have been "consequential"?

You seem to think I am scum for not being angry and not telling Chaqa off for posting some memes. This is nonsense.

You should apologise to me, Worcej.

I owe you no apology for anything I've done. Stop acting like Durga and taking my commentary as a personal attack on you - it never was.

I don't interpret it as a personal attack. The problem is that the "Jamie is calm, he must be scum" argument is lazy, it's tired, it's old, and it's not true. Worse, you know it's a bad argument, so your use of it is in bad faith.

[worcej]

I hope ya'll will explain the fake-claiming shenanigans to all of the slavering idiots in the back of the classroom. I am totally lost as to what fruits it has borne. I do not understand the current fingerpointing and I'm hoping the current fingerpointers make a coherent and understandable case.

My thoughts exactly

[damo666]

Im gonna go with my case on Ezio and just stop overthinking.

##vote ezio

and then RHK next.

that is all.

@brain please consider ghug/aaro. I think they're caught.

Can you explain how you believe they're caught - I don't see the logic.

See my reply to aaro

[worcej]

Explain how me reacting more to Chaqa's memes would have been "consequential"?

You seem to think I am scum for not being angry and not telling Chaqa off for posting some memes. This is nonsense.

You should apologise to me, Worcej.

I owe you no apology for anything I've done. Stop acting like Durga and taking my commentary as a personal attack on you - it never was.

I don't interpret it as a personal attack. The problem is that the "Jamie is calm, he must be scum" argument is lazy, it's tired, it's old, and it's not true. Worse, you know it's a bad argument, so your use of it is in bad faith.

You're focusing too much on the negatives and assuming anti-calm is a negative trait here. You acted in a way I would not anticipate and did not engage on things I've seen town!Jamie jump on a lot.

[worcej]

Yes, I may have caught him in a scumslip. But that would mean both ghug and aaro are scum. Mmmm.

##vote aaro

Who did you catch in a scum slip?

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

ISO'ing to confirm

[damo666]

I hope ya'll will explain the fake-claiming shenanigans to all of the slavering idiots in the back of the classroom. I am totally lost as to what fruits it has borne. I do not understand the current fingerpointing and I'm hoping the current fingerpointers make a coherent and understandable case.

My thoughts exactly

Aaro and I are partners.

Ghug said he knew that I knew he was lying. This implies he knew I was partnered with aaro. This implies both ghug and aaro are scum. QED

[ghug]

Explain how me reacting more to Chaqa's memes would have been "consequential"?

You seem to think I am scum for not being angry and not telling Chaqa off for posting some memes. This is nonsense.

You should apologise to me, Worcej.

I owe you no apology for anything I've done. Stop acting like Durga and taking my commentary as a personal attack on you - it never was.

I don't interpret it as a personal attack. The problem is that the "Jamie is calm, he must be scum" argument is lazy, it's tired, it's old, and it's not true. Worse, you know it's a bad argument, so your use of it is in bad faith.

I agree with all of this except the last bit.

[worcej]

I hope ya'll will explain the fake-claiming shenanigans to all of the slavering idiots in the back of the classroom. I am totally lost as to what fruits it has borne. I do not understand the current fingerpointing and I'm hoping the current fingerpointers make a coherent and understandable case.

My thoughts exactly

Aaro and I are partners.

Ghug said he knew that I knew he was lying. This implies he knew I was partnered with aaro. This implies both ghug and aaro are scum. QED

I read what ghug said as you knew he was lying in the moment because you are partners with aaro and therefor when he claimed, you knew he was lying.

If you're not partnered with Aaro, then I follow your logic here. I just see ghug speaking in past tense.

[ghug]

Who did you catch in a scum slip?

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

ISO'ing to confirm

It was like a page ago, after aaro had claimed damo was his partner.

It was also the only option once the rest of you had claimed.

[worcej]

I owe you no apology for anything I've done. Stop acting like Durga and taking my commentary as a personal attack on you - it never was.

I don't interpret it as a personal attack. The problem is that the "Jamie is calm, he must be scum" argument is lazy, it's tired, it's old, and it's not true. Worse, you know it's a bad argument, so your use of it is in bad faith.

I agree with all of this except the last bit.

Let me guess: because I don't know it's bad?

[aarodactyl]

Yes, I may have caught him in a scumslip. But that would mean both ghug and aaro are scum. Mmmm.

##vote aaro

Who did you catch in a scum slip?

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

Once the claims happened on D1, there was a full mapping of partners. If he assumed that no one lied outside of him, his partner, me, and my partner, then my partner had to be you.

[worcej]

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

ISO'ing to confirm

It was like a page ago, after aaro had claimed damo was his partner.

It was also the only option once the rest of you had claimed.

Like I said, I don't think you're caught with a slip with what you said. You were speaking in past tense from the perspective of damo.

[Jamiet99uk]

Congrats on possibly bussing - I find it odd you're trying to take credit for that considering the context of it all

If I was bussing I would have been voting and pushing HB sooner.

Potentially - I am not immune to thinking your possibly town, but I hard disagree with everyone championing you as town for that vote considering it was effectively naked other than your concern on BB and then your 3rd to last post was to try to get BB before HB.

you're

[worcej]

Who did you catch in a scum slip?

ghug said he knew that i knew he was lying. Well I did but how could ghug know that unless you are his scum partner?

Once the claims happened on D1, there was a full mapping of partners. If he assumed that no one lied outside of him, his partner, me, and my partner, then my partner had to be you.

OHHHH.....

But BB didn't refute and also allowing the statement that damo was his partner.

[brainbomb]

wait a sec so do you mean that by me NOT claiming anything or refuting anything I actually helped town. is this a first?

guys I think I just won mvp. this is a first.

but really its still ezio probably

[worcej]

##vote aaro
##end

[brainbomb]

In any case, townreads and scumreads:

Ghug and aaro
jamie and S&c
BB and Damo
Worcej and Chaqa
Kak and HB
Vecna and Ezio
Rdr and RHK

Really doesn't tell me a lot lol. I guess brain and damo being max one scum is nice.

?

[worcej]

I feel very confident in aaro being scum now based off his last statement