Townreading the unmentioned. Dousing and Haze seem the most 'flappy'. Nothing more specific.
Pretty confident in my townreads.
#2941 Post by damo666 » Fri May 19, 2023 2:25 pm
Townreading the unmentioned. Dousing and Haze seem the most 'flappy'. Nothing more specific.
#2942 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri May 19, 2023 2:26 pm
"Flappy" meaning they tend to change their opinion frequently, as in someone "flip-flopping", or do you mean something else?damo666 wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:25 pmTownreading the unmentioned. Dousing and Haze seem the most 'flappy'. Nothing more specific.
Pretty confident in my townreads.
#2943 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:26 pm
I think your playing a pretty solid game. I do not off the top of my head know exactly what bozo theory you are referring too and I dont really think kak and fox are scum together.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:21 pm
I think you're being slightly kind to me here, but I'm not sure.... Do you have an opinion on Bozo's theory? I concluded that Bozo was wrong to read the Fox / Kak interaction as scum!fox addressing scum!kak. However since I posted that analysis, Fox has been flagged as likely scum by Worcej's scan. So, could Bozo have been on to something?
#2945 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:31 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 8:33 pmdamo and worcej being on Dousing is confounding
ghug explained, bozo explained, rdr asleep/at work
damo like just gave Dousing a pass :|worcej naked voted with no other postspyxxy wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 8:41 pmDousing is clearly an afk townie who is going to miss EOD and town doesn't gain anything at all by flipping Dousing here.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 8:37 pmI am at work and I explained my vote.
Dousing justifying his vote saying Eden got better later in the game when he just played once with Eden and Eden was scum just look scum parking a vote and his answer doesn't make it better and seems more people agree with me.
Nothing to be gained. At all.
It's a mistake to not have wagons at least be between Bozo and Eden.
It seems to me that when mafia go to set up the next series of miskills, and youre sitting in scumchat deciding who to kill...
you prioritize
who is a threat to us
who is a PR maybe
who poses an impediment to our goals (with regards to miskills)
and usually nightkill logic avoids things like
Hey lets kill this guy because they are hard defending one of our weaker team members
Using this logic, or even some of this logic, it should lead you to question what pyxyy was doing, and based on this, maybe they just really wanted dousing to die next
#2946 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:34 pm
#2947 Post by President Eden » Fri May 19, 2023 2:43 pm
I didn’t think to apply it beyond ghug, but yea it applies to you too. Which probably means you’re just clean here. I’ll think on itrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:11 pmAnd I feel a bit offended Eden didn't apply the same logic to me, he thinks I will agree with that play.ghug wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 4:47 amI think this works for me because I'm pretty risk averse but I think there are ways where I get overruled and some people are more risk tolerant in general so I'm not a fan of using this logic.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:39 am
ghug knew what was happening with my role the whole time, he wouldn't have let his team mess up this bad mechanically.
Kak I've simply never seen with this consistent level of engagement with the game as scum. He wants this W
#2948 Post by damo666 » Fri May 19, 2023 2:50 pm
without substance, not confidentJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:26 pm"Flappy" meaning they tend to change their opinion frequently, as in someone "flip-flopping", or do you mean something else?
#2949 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:51 pm
#2950 Post by damo666 » Fri May 19, 2023 2:51 pm
pyxxy couldn't have known anything so I don't see why
#2951 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri May 19, 2023 2:53 pm
You literally quoted it in your post on the last page.....
#2952 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:54 pm
#2953 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 2:56 pm
bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:08 am
This seemed to me like something someone would be more likely to say to a mafia teammate. Was this a serious attempt to dissuade Kakarroto from continuing making the kind of posts you were objecting to?
#2954 Post by rdrivera2005 » Fri May 19, 2023 2:59 pm
brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:31 pmAlso people keep scumreading dousing and I should probably point out that pyxxy was very against the dousing wagon, and called out fox directly for being on it.
Pyxxy being town doesn't make his read on Dousing better or worst. It was pretty obvious he was town as no scum will made that kind of white knighting he did.pyxxy wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 8:33 pmdamo and worcej being on Dousing is confounding
ghug explained, bozo explained, rdr asleep/at work
damo like just gave Dousing a pass :|worcej naked voted with no other posts
It seems to me that when mafia go to set up the next series of miskills, and youre sitting in scumchat deciding who to kill...
you prioritize
who is a threat to us
who is a PR maybe
who poses an impediment to our goals (with regards to miskills)
and usually nightkill logic avoids things like
Hey lets kill this guy because they are hard defending one of our weaker team members
Using this logic, or even some of this logic, it should lead you to question what pyxyy was doing, and based on this, maybe they just really wanted dousing to die next
Fox voted Dousing to make it a tie, but he moved out in a weird way (trying to get a Kak wagon going) and ended on Bozo. I won't clear Dousing over this.
I know I could be tunneling a bit, but I don't see any town spark from him like we saw last game.
#2955 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 3:01 pm
#2956 Post by Foxcastle » Fri May 19, 2023 3:03 pm
#2958 Post by worcej » Fri May 19, 2023 3:05 pm
Why is it obvious that dousing was driven?
#2959 Post by brainbomb » Fri May 19, 2023 3:06 pm
#2960 Post by worcej » Fri May 19, 2023 3:06 pm
I really love the effort to salvage something from your loss Fox. I really commend it.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 3:03 pmI think Worcej &co made an error. I was thinking about how irritated I am that town will get basically no information from today, and then I realized that that's by design. Worcej immediately announced the "result" of his scan (why not hold the result and see what happens and announce it later after some data has been generated), BUT they also moved the deadline up 24 hours so that people would be less likely to pause, step back, and reassess. Dead townie, wasted day, and likely a forced PR claim to resolve Worcej.
##VOTE WORCEJ
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, French_boi, SaintSimmer, Spartaculous