no it doesn’t. stop painting manipulative narratives.
I tell you the correct answer for how to read rdr/pyx/bozo/damo and you say literally “I need something better to go by”
Its not that I distrust this take. I just dont resonate with these talking points because I see it the complete opposite way. I see it as he has become a wallflower other than his filler spamming. or as you call it provocative.1. Kakarrotto;
after the goofy and obviously preplanned flavor posts that I still didn't read
he had these three posts that I liked and didn't think would come from scum!kak this early
he's more of a wallflower as scum. obviously he can make a conscious decision to play differently as scum, but the town motivation for this more proactive approach is obvious, so I'm willing to buy it for now
Proof? Examples? This is a totally empty platitude offering nothing of any good faith attempt to evaluate these players. saying “theyve voted scum before”, is true of every single player on webdip in all2. Regarding :damo, rdrivera, pyxxy, bozo
their towntells are voting scum
mafia history.
3.
I tell you why ghug shouldn’t be a d1 rand and you act like we’re just sitting around praying for something to happen
you’re just being negative for negative’s sake. hence shitting on constructive answers
Now youre just grasping at straws. I dont see why your reasoning for ghug being spared d1 is valid. hes a top wagon and you avoided even talking about that