MAFIA 79: The Price is Right! [GAME THREAD]

[worcej]

##CALL GM

Thank you for trying, but I don't know what the fuck that's meant to be.

It's not a proper vote count. Please would you have another go?

GM Note:
Well, if you look closely at the table, you would see I am tracking votes made by each player in a tabular form. The furthest vote to the right is the most current vote.

If you require more assistance on reading this table and method I am utilizing to track the same information the bot typically provides, feel free to PM me on Discord.

[Bonatogether]

what time is eod

In about another 18-20 hours

thanks jimothy

[Jamiet99uk]

##CALL GM

Thank you for trying, but I don't know what the fuck that's meant to be.

It's not a proper vote count. Please would you have another go?

GM just said they were busy, and provided a nice picture showing vote history.

But since you can't read, here you go:

I can read.

That's not what appears on my screen.

[Jamiet99uk]

Goons want a townie voted for. Koala asked to be voted for. Dumb goons would eagerly jump on the offer. And later on, after a 2nd player had voted for Koala, Koala started voting for themselves, making three votes. Then you decide to double down with your vote, after the bandwagon had formed.

So yes, I think there was an obvious potential bandwagon when you initially voted, and there was an actual bandwagon when you decided to vote Koala again.

I'm fairly sure the first vote for Koala was cast by Koala.

No?

Huh, somehow my eyes glazed over at the very beginning and missed that. I could have sworn that Koala only encouraged a vote for themselves, but I guess they actually did.

Oh.

Can't you read?

[snowy801]

I'm fairly sure the first vote for Koala was cast by Koala.

No?

Huh, somehow my eyes glazed over at the very beginning and missed that. I could have sworn that Koala only encouraged a vote for themselves, but I guess they actually did.

Oh.

Can't you read?

Oof

[Dousing]

Editting to add: I wasn't criticizing Dousing, just reminding people that unofficial tracking is not necessarily accurate and to refer to any VC by myself or Darg.

For the record: I am not at all offended by Worcej; there's a good chance my count was wrong and I think it's good that the GM just notes that there could be inconsistencies between a player's "vote count" and what the actual votes are. And this is clearly a one off thing, Worcej isn't gonna finger wag every time a "count" is put up.

Also for the record: I don't think my vote count was actually that far off aside from forgetting to include Snowy's vote against Bona. They were the only person to raise an eyebrow to my count (aside from Worcej for 100% justified reasons) and I am CERTAIN that there would have been more people making corrections if I made a mistake.

I think there is a chance the discrepancy is because Worcej was counting *current* votes while my count was a few hours old at that point.

[Jamiet99uk]

If you require more assistance on reading this table and method I am utilizing to track the same information the bot typically provides, feel free to PM me on Discord.

Oh, I will. You bet.

[snowy801]

Editting to add: I wasn't criticizing Dousing, just reminding people that unofficial tracking is not necessarily accurate and to refer to any VC by myself or Darg.

For the record: I am not at all offended by Worcej; there's a good chance my count was wrong and I think it's good that the GM just notes that there could be inconsistencies between a player's "vote count" and what the actual votes are. And this is clearly a one off thing, Worcej isn't gonna finger wag every time a "count" is put up.

Also for the record: I don't think my vote count was actually that far off aside from forgetting to include Snowy's vote against Bona. They were the only person to raise an eyebrow to my count (aside from Worcej for 100% justified reasons) and I am CERTAIN that there would have been more people making corrections if I made a mistake.

I think there is a chance the discrepancy is because Worcej was counting *current* votes while my count was a few hours old at that point.

It's not a question of your being offended, though I am glad you're not. It's about potential excess information being provided by GM notes.

[Dousing]

Editting to add: I wasn't criticizing Dousing, just reminding people that unofficial tracking is not necessarily accurate and to refer to any VC by myself or Darg.

For the record: I am not at all offended by Worcej; there's a good chance my count was wrong and I think it's good that the GM just notes that there could be inconsistencies between a player's "vote count" and what the actual votes are. And this is clearly a one off thing, Worcej isn't gonna finger wag every time a "count" is put up.

Also for the record: I don't think my vote count was actually that far off aside from forgetting to include Snowy's vote against Bona. They were the only person to raise an eyebrow to my count (aside from Worcej for 100% justified reasons) and I am CERTAIN that there would have been more people making corrections if I made a mistake.

I think there is a chance the discrepancy is because Worcej was counting *current* votes while my count was a few hours old at that point.

It's not a question of your being offended, though I am glad you're not. It's about potential excess information being provided by GM notes.

I assumed so but I figured I might as well say somethign

at the very least it balances the ratio between posts made by me and posts made by Bona

[Jamiet99uk]

Ok let's leave this whole unofficial vote count issue here, shall we...?

[Jamiet99uk]

##Vote Ghug for pretending that he can't participate because people are allowed to have tiny little Avatar pictures now; and for suggesting that he is sincere about this and no longer shitposting.

[sweetandcool]

I'm fairly sure the first vote for Koala was cast by Koala.

No?

Huh, somehow my eyes glazed over at the very beginning and missed that. I could have sworn that Koala only encouraged a vote for themselves, but I guess they actually did.

Oh.

Can't you read?

I know you like to be brusque and feel witty with comments like these, but there is an obvious difference between you (coming across as) whining at the busy GM when they just provided the resource you requested, and me missing a single line amongst the 200+ posts I looked through. You came across as not wanting to read the table in the picture provided because it wasn't immediately obvious to you. So I called you out on being lazy and provided the info in the format you wanted. If the picture wasn't loading for you, make that clear next time, instead of telling the GM to try again.

[Jamiet99uk]

Huh, somehow my eyes glazed over at the very beginning and missed that. I could have sworn that Koala only encouraged a vote for themselves, but I guess they actually did.

Oh.

Can't you read?

I know you like to be brusque and feel witty with comments like these, but there is an obvious difference between you (coming across as) whining at the busy GM when they just provided the resource you requested, and me missing a single line amongst the 200+ posts I looked through. You came across as not wanting to read the table in the picture provided because it wasn't immediately obvious to you. So I called you out on being lazy and provided the info in the format you wanted. If the picture wasn't loading for you, make that clear next time, instead of telling the GM to try again.

I appreciate you are new here so I'll let you off with comments like these, but there is a fairly standard Vote Count format that has been employed in webDip Mafia games for a very long time - well before the "Peterbot" had been dreamed up. It would be helpful for that format to be maintained. I genuinely had difficulty reading whatever it was that Worcej posted. So maybe you shouldn't talk down to me in the first place, and we'd all get along better.

[sweetandcool]

Oh.

Can't you read?

I know you like to be brusque and feel witty with comments like these, but there is an obvious difference between you (coming across as) whining at the busy GM when they just provided the resource you requested, and me missing a single line amongst the 200+ posts I looked through. You came across as not wanting to read the table in the picture provided because it wasn't immediately obvious to you. So I called you out on being lazy and provided the info in the format you wanted. If the picture wasn't loading for you, make that clear next time, instead of telling the GM to try again.

I appreciate you are new here so I'll let you off with comments like these, but there is a fairly standard Vote Count format that has been employed in webDip Mafia games for a very long time - well before the "Peterbot" had been dreamed up. It would be helpful for that format to be maintained. I genuinely had difficulty reading whatever it was that Worcej posted. So maybe you shouldn't talk down to me in the first place, and we'd all get along better.

Okay, I apologize for my initial tone. Honestly, I was trying to lean into the tone of the forum (you all call it shitposting?), and as the most prolific poster of the forum, I was genuinely using you, Jamiet, as an example for the type of tone to use.

Perhaps since I am new here I am not allowed to use the same tone that the in-crowd uses, since I could easily come across as being seriously rude. But perhaps you should also examine yourself and decide whether your posts actively encourage a brusque and kind of rude tone, and whether you want newcomers to follow your example.

[Jamiet99uk]

I know you like to be brusque and feel witty with comments like these, but there is an obvious difference between you (coming across as) whining at the busy GM when they just provided the resource you requested, and me missing a single line amongst the 200+ posts I looked through. You came across as not wanting to read the table in the picture provided because it wasn't immediately obvious to you. So I called you out on being lazy and provided the info in the format you wanted. If the picture wasn't loading for you, make that clear next time, instead of telling the GM to try again.

I appreciate you are new here so I'll let you off with comments like these, but there is a fairly standard Vote Count format that has been employed in webDip Mafia games for a very long time - well before the "Peterbot" had been dreamed up. It would be helpful for that format to be maintained. I genuinely had difficulty reading whatever it was that Worcej posted. So maybe you shouldn't talk down to me in the first place, and we'd all get along better.

Okay, I apologize for my initial tone. Honestly, I was trying to lean into the tone of the forum (you all call it shitposting?), and as the most prolific poster of the forum, I was genuinely using you, Jamiet, as an example for the type of tone to use.

Perhaps since I am new here I am not allowed to use the same tone that the in-crowd uses, since I could easily come across as being seriously rude. But perhaps you should also examine yourself and decide whether your posts actively encourage a brusque and kind of rude tone, and whether you want newcomers to follow your example.

No no, we're good, we're good.

I like a little rough-and-tumble.

So let's move on.

Do you think Ghug is scum, and why?

[Chaqa]

Lfischl Vote Count #1:
Chaqa (69): Wjessop1, Wjessop2, Wjessop3, Wjessop4, Wjessop5, Wjessop6, Wjessop7, Wjessop8, Wjessop9, Wjessop10, Wjessop11, Wjessop12, Wjessop13, Wjessop14, Wjessop15, Wjessop16, Wjessop17, Wjessop18, Wjessop19, Wjessop20, Wjessop21, Wjessop22, Wjessop23, Wjessop24, Wjessop25, Wjessop26, Wjessop27, Wjessop28, Wjessop29, Wjessop30, Wjessop31, Wjessop32, Wjessop33, Wjessop34, Wjessop35, Wjessop36, Wjessop37, Wjessop38, Wjessop39, Wjessop40, Wjessop41, Wjessop42, Wjessop43, Wjessop44, Wjessop45, Wjessop46, Wjessop47, Wjessop48, Wjessop49, Wjessop50, Wjessop51, Wjessop52, Wjessop53, Wjessop54, Wjessop55, Wjessop56, Wjessop57, Wjessop58, Wjessop59, Wjessop60, Wjessop61, Wjessop62, Wjessop63, Wjessop64, Wjessop65, Wjessop66, Wjessop67, Wjessop68, Wjessop69
President Eden (0): no one ever wants Eden for anything

Currently JAMIET is set to not understand the joke.

420 minutes remain

[sweetandcool]

Not enough information to conclude anything about Ghug. Just the suspicious #210 post. Why would a townie vote for Koala?

So if I'm forced to decide scum/not scum, I guess more likely to be scum.

[Jamiet99uk]

Lfischl Vote Count #1:
Chaqa (69): Wjessop1, Wjessop2, Wjessop3, Wjessop4, Wjessop5, Wjessop6, Wjessop7, Wjessop8, Wjessop9, Wjessop10, Wjessop11, Wjessop12, Wjessop13, Wjessop14, Wjessop15, Wjessop16, Wjessop17, Wjessop18, Wjessop19, Wjessop20, Wjessop21, Wjessop22, Wjessop23, Wjessop24, Wjessop25, Wjessop26, Wjessop27, Wjessop28, Wjessop29, Wjessop30, Wjessop31, Wjessop32, Wjessop33, Wjessop34, Wjessop35, Wjessop36, Wjessop37, Wjessop38, Wjessop39, Wjessop40, Wjessop41, Wjessop42, Wjessop43, Wjessop44, Wjessop45, Wjessop46, Wjessop47, Wjessop48, Wjessop49, Wjessop50, Wjessop51, Wjessop52, Wjessop53, Wjessop54, Wjessop55, Wjessop56, Wjessop57, Wjessop58, Wjessop59, Wjessop60, Wjessop61, Wjessop62, Wjessop63, Wjessop64, Wjessop65, Wjessop66, Wjessop67, Wjessop68, Wjessop69
President Eden (0): no one ever wants Eden for anything

Currently JAMIET is set to not understand the joke.

420 minutes remain

So, you are suggesting we must ##Vote President Eden. Yes?

I'm so great at deciphering Chaqa's riddles!

[Jamiet99uk]

Chaqa is the bulletproof vigilante cop doctor backup town roleblocking inventor and we should follow him all the way to the playoffs.

[rdrivera2005]

Has Rdr posted yet?

Yes. But not that much. I even explained that without the bot it's harder to me to participate during the day.