Were there any duplicate results?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:18 pmThere are 3 mafia, they couldn't all say they checked ghug, and there is risk in accidently claiming a check on the dog without knowing they are the dog. There is little risk of revealing the identity of the dog to the mafia, since the dog can safely claim a fake check, and the dog power is not significant enough to be overly worried about giving away their identity.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:50 pmTown points for Kak. Scum points for BozoKakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:50 am
I don't think we want this, really don't like this. Depending on our behaviour, mafia would have a much easier time to predict who's the dog and I think it's hard to not let that influence the scan your reads.
Like if you suspected someone before and now suddenly don't with that name reveal you've just helped mafia.
Also it's just a coincidence you scanned ghug who was the target of the mafia action, I presume? Naah, I don't like this, not one bit.
This is one of the most useless surveys I have ever seen as it gets no usefull results (scum can easily fake a pat o a dead player like Ghug for example or there are other ways to avoid giving any info to town that I won't tell) and it will give info to scum because some morobs will disclose the result and make the pool smaller.
Bozo ain't a bad player, so ##vote Bozo
Assuming the mafia did not check the dog, they had the choice of claiming a check on ghug, claiming a check on someone who may or not may not be the dog, claiming they did not check anyone, or refusing to answer. If they did check the dog, only one would want to give the real dog as their check.
So, the useful results are:
1. the reaction to the survey
2. the potential for the mafia to fake a check on the real dog without knowing the identity of the dog
M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
-
- Posts: 13797
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
No, which is somewhat interesting.lfischl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:22 pmWere there any duplicate results?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:18 pmThere are 3 mafia, they couldn't all say they checked ghug, and there is risk in accidently claiming a check on the dog without knowing they are the dog. There is little risk of revealing the identity of the dog to the mafia, since the dog can safely claim a fake check, and the dog power is not significant enough to be overly worried about giving away their identity.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:50 pm
Town points for Kak. Scum points for Bozo
This is one of the most useless surveys I have ever seen as it gets no usefull results (scum can easily fake a pat o a dead player like Ghug for example or there are other ways to avoid giving any info to town that I won't tell) and it will give info to scum because some morobs will disclose the result and make the pool smaller.
Bozo ain't a bad player, so ##vote Bozo
Assuming the mafia did not check the dog, they had the choice of claiming a check on ghug, claiming a check on someone who may or not may not be the dog, claiming they did not check anyone, or refusing to answer. If they did check the dog, only one would want to give the real dog as their check.
So, the useful results are:
1. the reaction to the survey
2. the potential for the mafia to fake a check on the real dog without knowing the identity of the dog
-
- Posts: 13797
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
I think that depends on the player, Bonatogether has demonstrated the ability to be very active as mafia.heartthrob24909 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:21 pmhe was generating a lot of conversation which i'm starting to pick up as generally a town trait. also i feel like a scum wouldn't want to draw so much attention to themselves early on but maybe i'm wrong there
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
I mean one thing to consider is that while the mafia is definitely lying, what's the likelihood that at least 1 sheep liedbozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:23 pmNo, which is somewhat interesting.lfischl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:22 pmWere there any duplicate results?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:18 pm
There are 3 mafia, they couldn't all say they checked ghug, and there is risk in accidently claiming a check on the dog without knowing they are the dog. There is little risk of revealing the identity of the dog to the mafia, since the dog can safely claim a fake check, and the dog power is not significant enough to be overly worried about giving away their identity.
Assuming the mafia did not check the dog, they had the choice of claiming a check on ghug, claiming a check on someone who may or not may not be the dog, claiming they did not check anyone, or refusing to answer. If they did check the dog, only one would want to give the real dog as their check.
So, the useful results are:
1. the reaction to the survey
2. the potential for the mafia to fake a check on the real dog without knowing the identity of the dog
-
- Posts: 13797
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
It is possible, although not particularly helpful.lfischl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:25 pmI mean one thing to consider is that while the mafia is definitely lying, what's the likelihood that at least 1 sheep lied
- heartthrob24909
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2022 12:19 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
sheep could lie to protect ID of sheepdog if they find it maybe. but idk what would motivate me to do that. still working on wrapping my head around what we find out from this survey. but i liked the point someone made earlier about using everyone's reactions to the survey itself as evidence to go off oflfischl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:25 pmI mean one thing to consider is that while the mafia is definitely lying, what's the likelihood that at least 1 sheep lied
-
- Posts: 13797
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
Considering the majority of players have participated in the dog survey, I think it is suspicious for Kakarroto and rdrivera to refuse to participate based on an objection to the survey. I also don't like how Kakarroto seemed to be setting me up for votes without voting for me, and doing so by suspecting my own answer to the survey despite supposedly not seeing any value in it.
##VOTE Kakarroto
##VOTE Kakarroto
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
bozo givith cringe reasoning
are not the scum more likely to lie (with literally no blowback possibility) versus singling themselves out by refusing to answer
are not the scum more likely to lie (with literally no blowback possibility) versus singling themselves out by refusing to answer
-
- Posts: 13797
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
Maybe, or they could just claim they did not check anyone.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:39 pmbozo givith cringe reasoning
are not the scum more likely to lie (with literally no blowback possibility) versus singling themselves out by refusing to answer
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
well i just found his line of reasoning real funny, and he refused to give and explain a post that he actually found scummy after he proclaimed he found every post of mine on the first 5 pages scummy. also the 'it's weird that bona would guess bungo did the gm call' feels a lot like how i've been set up to die over stupid shit before. once i starting building a wagon on him, he ended eod with 'oh, bona and i just never understand each other'celaph wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 8:38 amCan you say more about your read on Bunny? It seems like you were at odds with him early and then increased your anti-bunny rhetoric when I shared my suspicion.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 2:18 amwas a mistake and probably could have read him better but i think it was solid regardless
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
cause i'm just cool like that
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
ayo?
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
wow past me was samrt
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
it's ok, someone will tinfoil him sooner or laterbo_sox48 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 4:43 pmSame, but I’m not a fan of completely letting someone off the hook early on for it. Can’t learn the game that way.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:58 pmagree with this reasoningcelaph wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:03 amOn the topic of heart, he answered Bozo's petting question with inherent trust that Bozo had a decent reason for asking and that he could safely answer and figure out the reason later. That feels way more newb town than newb scum to me.
Secondly,
It's certainly possible that Heart's a great actor and playing up how little he knows. But if he's mafia, then presumably he just spent 24 hours in a discord with two other players explaining their reasoning on who to kill. I do not believe that anyone spends time seriously contemplating their best kill and decides its ghug because he got votes.
Heart is town.
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
i see you and your +1 @chaqa
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
2. is nothing. no one should be saying their result, so literally the only thing you've done is ask people to pr hunt in the threadbozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:18 pmThere are 3 mafia, they couldn't all say they checked ghug, and there is risk in accidently claiming a check on the dog without knowing they are the dog. There is little risk of revealing the identity of the dog to the mafia, since the dog can safely claim a fake check, and the dog power is not significant enough to be overly worried about giving away their identity.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:50 pmTown points for Kak. Scum points for BozoKakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:50 am
I don't think we want this, really don't like this. Depending on our behaviour, mafia would have a much easier time to predict who's the dog and I think it's hard to not let that influence the scan your reads.
Like if you suspected someone before and now suddenly don't with that name reveal you've just helped mafia.
Also it's just a coincidence you scanned ghug who was the target of the mafia action, I presume? Naah, I don't like this, not one bit.
This is one of the most useless surveys I have ever seen as it gets no usefull results (scum can easily fake a pat o a dead player like Ghug for example or there are other ways to avoid giving any info to town that I won't tell) and it will give info to scum because some morobs will disclose the result and make the pool smaller.
Bozo ain't a bad player, so ##vote Bozo
Assuming the mafia did not check the dog, they had the choice of claiming a check on ghug, claiming a check on someone who may or not may not be the dog, claiming they did not check anyone, or refusing to answer. If they did check the dog, only one would want to give the real dog as their check.
So, the useful results are:
1. the reaction to the survey
2. the potential for the mafia to fake a check on the real dog without knowing the identity of the dog
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:25 pmI think that depends on the player, Bonatogether has demonstrated the ability to be very active as mafia.heartthrob24909 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:21 pmhe was generating a lot of conversation which i'm starting to pick up as generally a town trait. also i feel like a scum wouldn't want to draw so much attention to themselves early on but maybe i'm wrong there
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10140
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M1023: Mafarmia [GAME THREAD] [HIDDEN]
sheep lying is the best result because it means we're not putting pr hunt thoughts in the thread likes actual sheeplebozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:41 pmIt is possible, although not particularly helpful.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Spartaculous, TheMadMonarch