MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6061 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm

Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.

President Eden
Posts: 7498
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Location: possibly Britain
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6062 Post by President Eden » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:17 pm
Well, let’s live in information that scum already know: they clearly took Sabi seriously when they claimed the bomb, which in hindsight was stupid of Sabi to shout out on N1.

Sabi -> Neon -> Driver -> Sabi is now the most likely order of operations.
No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6063 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm

Sorry - failure in my analysis. Someone must be celaph, vecna, or ghug. This eliminates celaph as the BD.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6064 Post by Chaqa » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
I think the tag got taken on N3 since Rivera couldn't have had it on D3.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6065 Post by Chaqa » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
I think the tag got taken on N3 since Rivera couldn't have had it on D3.
*this is about the 2-vote tag, but I also think your tag was taken that day.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6066 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
Why is this true in the bolded case?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6067 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm

President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:17 pm
Well, let’s live in information that scum already know: they clearly took Sabi seriously when they claimed the bomb, which in hindsight was stupid of Sabi to shout out on N1.

Sabi -> Neon -> Driver -> Sabi is now the most likely order of operations.
No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no
Neon was scum - throw any claim she made in the fucking dumpster

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6068 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm

Darg might have not done anything with the flowers.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6069 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm

President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:17 pm
Well, let’s live in information that scum already know: they clearly took Sabi seriously when they claimed the bomb, which in hindsight was stupid of Sabi to shout out on N1.

Sabi -> Neon -> Driver -> Sabi is now the most likely order of operations.
No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no
I thought this at first, but Darg actually flipped with the tag of whoever performed the kill, and the killer got his tag, which could have feasibly been the bomb.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6070 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm
Darg might have not done anything with the flowers.
I highly doubt Neon fakeclaims the flowers on that chance.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6071 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
Why is this true in the bolded case?
I initially got it wrong. The double vote was for sure amongst you, celaph, or Vecna on N2

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6072 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm
Darg might have not done anything with the flowers.
I highly doubt Neon fakeclaims the flowers on that chance.
Which is fine, because Darg probably wanted to lift the bomb off Sabi

President Eden
Posts: 7498
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Location: possibly Britain
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6073 Post by President Eden » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm
President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:17 pm
Well, let’s live in information that scum already know: they clearly took Sabi seriously when they claimed the bomb, which in hindsight was stupid of Sabi to shout out on N1.

Sabi -> Neon -> Driver -> Sabi is now the most likely order of operations.
No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no
Neon was scum - throw any claim she made in the fucking dumpster
It’s not that simple. SOMEONE received flowers N1. It’s a compulsory role. The only person killed N1—and thus potentially unable to counterclaim receipt of flowers—was the Florist, the only person who could not have received flowers. If Neon lied, someone was alive with the knowledge to call her out. No one did. That someone could have been a teammate who covered for her by staying quiet, but there’s an obvious incentive for Dargo to have visited Sabi (which would redirect to Neon). Thus I see no reason to doubt Neon’s flower claim, despite her being mafia.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6074 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
Why is this true in the bolded case?
I initially got it wrong. The double vote was for sure amongst you, celaph, or Vecna on N2
It has to have been me or celaph. Vecna had his death tag when he peeked D2.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6075 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:35 pm

President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm
President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm

No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no
Neon was scum - throw any claim she made in the fucking dumpster
It’s not that simple. SOMEONE received flowers N1. It’s a compulsory role. The only person killed N1—and thus potentially unable to counterclaim receipt of flowers—was the Florist, the only person who could not have received flowers. If Neon lied, someone was alive with the knowledge to call her out. No one did. That someone could have been a teammate who covered for her by staying quiet, but there’s an obvious incentive for Dargo to have visited Sabi (which would redirect to Neon). Thus I see no reason to doubt Neon’s flower claim, despite her being mafia.
That’s fine - see ghug’s comments though

President Eden
Posts: 7498
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Location: possibly Britain
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6076 Post by President Eden » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:35 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm
President Eden wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:17 pm
Well, let’s live in information that scum already know: they clearly took Sabi seriously when they claimed the bomb, which in hindsight was stupid of Sabi to shout out on N1.

Sabi -> Neon -> Driver -> Sabi is now the most likely order of operations.
No, it’s the opposite. Remember that Neon claimed flowers D2. No one cc’d, so unless Neon made a wild fakeclaim that happened to work out (teammate had to have actually gotten flowers), then we know the claim is true and Dargo visited Sabi after the Bus Driver made their play. Dargo would have ended up with the bomb… which means mafia had to get lucky and guess Dargo was visiting Sabi to get the bomb back.

Possible? Sure. More likely than just ordering Neon -> Sabi -> Driver and tucking the bomb away for later? I say no
I thought this at first, but Darg actually flipped with the tag of whoever performed the kill, and the killer got his tag, which could have feasibly been the bomb.
Yes, but knowing that Sabi would likely be targeted by any townie with tag switching abilities just to stop the bomb, if you’re mafia trying to steal the bomb, why would you order in such a way as to need to guess right to get it back, when you don’t have to?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6077 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:35 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:31 pm


Why is this true in the bolded case?
I initially got it wrong. The double vote was for sure amongst you, celaph, or Vecna on N2
It has to have been me or celaph. Vecna had his death tag when he peeked D2.
Which eliminates celaph from being the BD

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6078 Post by ghug » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:36 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:33 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 pm
Darg might have not done anything with the flowers.
I highly doubt Neon fakeclaims the flowers on that chance.
Which is fine, because Darg probably wanted to lift the bomb off Sabi
Right, so we can reasonably trust that claim (and Brian's peek claim, since there's not enough value in it to risk getting caught lying).

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6079 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:36 pm

In my hypothetical case

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]

#6080 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:38 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:30 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:29 pm
Fuck it, I am not waiting. We cannot know for sure if N2 is when scum lifted the zero off me, but let’s assume it is for this hypothetical situation.

We know that we had 9 people on snowy, so either the +2 and non-vote had to be on the BD on snowy or they were both not being voted.

We can quickly solve the non-votes, it had to be a combination of rdr, Vecna, and myself. If true, this leaves rdr as the bus driver as the only option.

If we go the route of the vote modifiers in the wagon, that requires the a switch like this:
Someone -> worcej -> BD -> someone
Worcej -> someone -> BD -> worcej

The BD in this case must be someone in Chaqa, celaph, Bona, Eden and Rumi.
I think the tag got taken on N3 since Rivera couldn't have had it on D3.
*this is about the 2-vote tag, but I also think your tag was taken that day.
The only option for rdr to have it is if he was the BD.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]