I don't have a strong towread on Worcej, but I see him more town then scum. I gave him some town points on D1 for hard advocating a no-lynch, which is something I don't think scum will do, but after that he just faded away. I also like his questioning of you as it doesn't seem what scum will do, I am more suspicious of the ones just budding you.
Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I'm not sure what else there is to discuss. The fact Yav missed was stated very clearly in the thread by the GM. Normally a scumslip is when a player accidentally reveals something only scum could know. Yav displays poor reading of the thread, which is *slightly* scummy.....but not something I would classify as a "GOTCHA" kinda slip.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Ever heard of a long weekend? I was 'gone' from Thursday until today. Not every vacation is a week long, no internet, paradise. Your shit-posting about this isn't helping me think you're any less scum. And this position of you being questionable isn't an OMGUS, I had it in my read on yav - look at my first post of D3 and then I voted for yav originally:
My analysis I just provided stands for my reasoning and I back it - I think you're jumping all over the place and not really hunting, just hurf-blurfing about trying to cause commotion and act as a 'leader' to get easy votes to follow you.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:27 amI have said a few times that I was suspect of Jaime's lurking. The reveal of Ezio as town confirmed to me that his tunneling was another blind rage move, which he has done numerous times in the past. But he also seems to scum hunt on other guys and is owning his failures.
I think Yav has been lurking most of this game, with a little bit of borderline PR hunting. Other than going for Jaime and pointing out his tunnel of ezio and commenting about damo, there is little value to his posts. I am skeptical on his town reads - I was scum leaning bo and just cause Vecna has Lump doesn't just make him town... I think it's scum trying to avoid contact more than anything else.
Of the two current wagons, I would ##vote yav based on how the two are playing currently. In general, I think we're now at 2 witches instead of 3 as well. I believe, of the two unknowns, that DT was most likely the witch over bo_sox, but of course I could be wrong. I assume the soup move on bozo was because I believe souping is not savable from Angel ND/Ezio and they were not entirely sure of the situation. I am glad to know that our vig is alive and active, so there is some merit in that being online to stir up some shit for the witches :)
I disagree, I think it is actually a Bo-Vecna-Yav team. Isolating Yav-Vecna together, they have never voted for each other once and I only find ONE interaction between the two publicly:Squigs44 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 3:39 pmThe only possible scumteam I could see happening with Vecna on it is a Bo-Jamie-Vecna scumteam. That's based off of what Vecna has done today. That would be a very bold play from Vecna, so I think it is unlikely, but still possible.
If Vecna is scum, who do you think his scummates are?
Vecna has barely applied any pressure to yav, regardless of other people's opinions on yav. He town read him once and as far as I can see, never had him in a scum pool once. I think they are distancing themselves intentionally and communicating in the QT. Again, my evidence is Vecna was going after, without mercy, on Ezio, DT, bozo, Squigs, numerous times on D1 and D2 and all 3 of these are confirmed town now. He has barely touched yav and bo (now dead), while also barely engaging Jamie, which makes me believe of that 2 untouched, those are the other scum so it leaves just him and yav.Vecna wrote: ↑Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:32 am@Yavuz, I think the acolyte needs to just low-key steer the lynch away from the priest if it ever happens. Giving the witches even a pool of where to find the priest seems like a bad idea - since there might be witches in that pool as well.
We really dont wanna give the witches any information whatsoever.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
** and 3 of those confirm town - we have no idea what Squigs is currently, but I somewhat town read him.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
WarLegend wrote a long post about that on QT, and I understood what it is and didn't need to ask again and again.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 4:55 pmI do think the fact that he posted that he didn't understand the soup mechanic in itself could be telling
@ Yav: What about the soup mechanic did you not understand?
I was wondering why they souped Bozo when they could have just NKd him. If they knew he was the Gambler, why not just NK him? The only reason I could see would be to dodge an angel save. Or if scum didn't understand the soup mechanics.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I need to reread but my inclination is to sheep you ##VOTE squigs
You're a sheeping sheep y2kjbk and I will sacrifice you today.ok ##VOTE worcej
Vote him, because he sucks. Only thing he does is following Vecna.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Seriously, that's what you come back to the thread with instead of any clarification for my spelled out reason for why I suspect your attitude towards the bozo flip?
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I will be transparent now and say that I am rereading with a piqued interest in worcej's claim that he thinks scum are bo_sox/vecna/yavuz.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Vecna wrote: ↑Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:01 pmThe real reason why being suspicious of me is somewhat silly; Scum would never want to lump themselves, because then when they continue to not die to the nightkill, and look very suspicious.
If they just lump town, they can then try to sow suspicion around by not night killing the slot.
Its super basic level 1 strategizing, but I wouldnt be surprised if thats exactly the reasoning they went for last night.
So Damo, are you the simpleton that thought that strategy was a good idea, and youre now trying to paint me scummy? Or are you seriously so gullible that after 1 nightkill elsewhere youre now gonna do exactly what scum wanted you to do?
Stop being distracted and do some actual scumhunting as opposed to trying to read into the nightkill outcome.
This is an interesting post, particularly because the initial logic is wrong. At the beginning of the game, I voted to lump ezio because i would expect scum not to be so bold as to claim lump immediately because that would be suspicious. Vecna isn't right at all that scum wouldn't want to lump though, because the lump is WAY more powerful in the hands of coordinated scum than it is in a townie trying to scum-hunt, if he can shake suspicion, which Vecna has done well so far, especially with his come-out claim that 3 witches are alive and his lump is necessary to ensure we don't lose, assuming he's town. Vecna got the lump by getting unexplained praise from a number of players that I bet contains at least one, baybe both scum-buddies of Vecna:
worcej wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:53 pmHmmm.... most interesting. I am curious who we should Lump since we'll have no idea if a witch or villager got him, but also the power of Lump is not too terribly impressive either.
I am more inclined to not give it to someone who self-voted, so I am going with ##Lump Vecna - he seems to generally get lucky with scum hunting in Mafia, why wouldn't it work here![]()
Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:40 pm##Vote Vecna to befriend the lumpy panda
Vecna is a sensible guy
I don't claim it for myself as my early reads are usually guff
rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:21 pmAbout the lump, I think we shouldn't openly decline on it as it could give witches some clues. I think Vecna could also be a good lump target, he is my first townread. Ezio is bold as scum, I know it well, so I don't think we should give him a town read just for self voting
##VOTE Vecna
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I thought about a Bo-Vec-Yav team since I couldn't see why Vec townread Yav and took him out of his scum pool. The reason I don't think this is the case is because I think Vec would have comtinued to push Jamie if this were the case. I'll reread and see what's up after work.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I think this was ND noticing that a handful of players expressing interest in giving the lump to Vecna made Vecna suspicious.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Really thats the best you can come up with? You actually confirm my exact logic, but you claim its wrong.y2kjbk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:35 pmVecna wrote: ↑Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:01 pmThe real reason why being suspicious of me is somewhat silly; Scum would never want to lump themselves, because then when they continue to not die to the nightkill, and look very suspicious.
If they just lump town, they can then try to sow suspicion around by not night killing the slot.
Its super basic level 1 strategizing, but I wouldnt be surprised if thats exactly the reasoning they went for last night.
So Damo, are you the simpleton that thought that strategy was a good idea, and youre now trying to paint me scummy? Or are you seriously so gullible that after 1 nightkill elsewhere youre now gonna do exactly what scum wanted you to do?
Stop being distracted and do some actual scumhunting as opposed to trying to read into the nightkill outcome.
This is an interesting post, particularly because the initial logic is wrong. At the beginning of the game, I voted to lump ezio because i would expect scum not to be so bold as to claim lump immediately because that would be suspicious. Vecna isn't right at all that scum wouldn't want to lump though, because the lump is WAY more powerful in the hands of coordinated scum than it is in a townie trying to scum-hunt, if he can shake suspicion, which Vecna has done well so far, especially with his come-out claim that 3 witches are alive and his lump is necessary to ensure we don't lose, assuming he's town. Vecna got the lump by getting unexplained praise from a number of players that I bet contains at least one, baybe both scum-buddies of Vecna:
worcej wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:53 pmHmmm.... most interesting. I am curious who we should Lump since we'll have no idea if a witch or villager got him, but also the power of Lump is not too terribly impressive either.
I am more inclined to not give it to someone who self-voted, so I am going with ##Lump Vecna - he seems to generally get lucky with scum hunting in Mafia, why wouldn't it work here
Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:40 pm##Vote Vecna to befriend the lumpy panda
Vecna is a sensible guy
I don't claim it for myself as my early reads are usually guff##VOTE Vecnardrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:21 pmAbout the lump, I think we shouldn't openly decline on it as it could give witches some clues. I think Vecna could also be a good lump target, he is my first townread. Ezio is bold as scum, I know it well, so I don't think we should give him a town read just for self voting
What happens if a scum with lump doesnt die fast? They get suspicion.
And ive been good at avoiding suspicion because ive been playing properly. Dont pretend its any different now because you wanna dig for my role that I softed earlier scumbucket.
The fact people piled on easily is because its easy to just dump it on a town and hope they become suspicious.
##vote Y2K
I mean, its fine that you quote all the living plays to lump me, but there were just as many confirmed towns in there. It doesnt prove anything.
At any rate, ill claim later on in the day and get you or one of your scumbuddies speedlynched.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
You set yourself up to confirm you own logic if anyone suspected you. Well played.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Lol, very intrigued to see what fake claim you'll have queued up for us.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Anyhow, as you mention, at least two of the people voting to lump you must have been town, so I really want to hear from all of them about my current logic here.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
You think that is what it is? You think ND noticed a pattern in like one or two persons randomly lump voting me on the first 3 pages of the game?
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Bro, youre reaching. Just return to bussing your teammates. In the off-chance you are the town in my scumpool, just sit down and help me figure it out instead of trying to stir up shit.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
It was pretty clear early on that there was growing consensus to lump you. I personally didn't read much into it because I didn't view the lump as all that powerful because in the hands of town it isn't, but in the hands of scum it is. So I think ND made that realization and voted and obviously wouldn't share it immediately in order to let the lump play out without anyone thinking about it all that much, as it has.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DimensionDoors, DiplomacyandWarfare, Spartaculous