President Eden wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:32 pmI actually didn't know it was meant to be this demeaning. I just figured it meant I was doing something wrong.BesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:29 pmDon’t play like you don’t clearly understand the demeaning effect of referring to it as a “tunnel,” which is very commonly understood to be an irrational, ill-founded push that ignores exonerating evidence.
MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 4:25 pm
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 4:25 pm
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
quotes suuuuck x.xRumi Tobari wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:37 pmI actually didn't know it was meant to be this demeaning. I just figured it meant I was doing something wrong.President Eden wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:32 pmDon’t play like you don’t clearly understand the demeaning effect of referring to it as a “tunnel,” which is very commonly understood to be an irrational, ill-founded push that ignores exonerating evidence.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
It’s referring to “having tunnel vision,” meaning that if you are tunneling, then for a number of possible reasons, you are dead-set committed on a theory of the case despite the presence of evidence to the contrary, and you are ignoring that evidence or not properly qualifying why that contrary evidence doesn’t matter.
Describing something as a tunnel isn’t per se demeaning—ghug stated that he believed I was tunneling on Byz to some degree, and he wasn’t being demeaning about it at all—but when one person is clearly earnestly explaining things and being cautious about conclusions, and the other responds with a one-off accusation of tunneling and no meaningful engagement, it comes off as demeaning to me.
Describing something as a tunnel isn’t per se demeaning—ghug stated that he believed I was tunneling on Byz to some degree, and he wasn’t being demeaning about it at all—but when one person is clearly earnestly explaining things and being cautious about conclusions, and the other responds with a one-off accusation of tunneling and no meaningful engagement, it comes off as demeaning to me.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
He was driving and wants to spend time with his family.bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:06 pmAssuming Byz/snowy is scum, why would scum rdrivera not participate in EOD with the chance to look good?
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
Both games I played on Mafia Universe had 14-day Day PhasesBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:20 pmMost sites are 12 or 24 hour nights lately. Only mafia scum is 48 hours. Because they are weirdos.
Potato, potato; potato.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
bruhJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:45 pmBoth games I played on Mafia Universe had 14-day Day PhasesBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:20 pmMost sites are 12 or 24 hour nights lately. Only mafia scum is 48 hours. Because they are weirdos.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
Likely the opposite. I think Pyxxy's vote going through decreases the chance of a tie by ensuring the number of people with relevant votes is odd. Assuming his vote goes through, we can only tie if one of the vote changing tags is off the wagons and the other is on the right wagon to make a difference. As for why he didn't vote earlier, I'm not entirely sure. @Pyxxy, if you haven't said already, why didn't you vote earlier?
One random thought is if Pyxxy and Byz are scum, does Pyxxy intentionally vote just after the deadline so that he can 'vote' for scum knowing his vote will be invalid?
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
ghug has opinions?bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:42 pmIf I were going to ban you for having opinions I would have to ban productive members of our site that have opinions such as Mapleleaf, Draugnar, Tettleton’s Chew, and ghugRumi Tobari wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:39 pmOkay everyone. Let's all shut the fuck up. Because this is not productive at all.BesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:37 pm
Great contribution.
Anyway I like this excerise. Helps figure out world building and if your reads make sense or not
I was wrong for having opinions. Like always before the banhammer drops. I apologize. I won't do it again.
Instead of doing this petty thing where we back and forth. Lets actually discuss relevent shit. Admittedly my only example of relevence is where the fuck was rdr at tiebreak?
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
I think I buy rivera just being busy and driving at EOD. I’m pretty sure I’m stealing this thought from somebody else but can’t be fucked to look up who—but someone said that if he were mafia, he would know the alignments of the wagons and know where he needed his vote to be, so he wouldn’t just randomly check in and then not move his vote unless his vote were right where it needed to be from the mafia’s perspective. I don’t see any inherent reason why his explanation is implausible. It doesn’t have to be true, but it passes the BS test to me
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 4:25 pm
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
This kind of thinking is why earlier (like in the page 80 or so range) I mentioned I was more incliend to trust you vs damo or Pyx, despite your relative lack of posting, it felt like you were adding value with your posts, whereas theirs didn't feel like they were.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
This is less true with the vote altering nametags and a third of people on vanity wagons. It undoes any potential pile-on.celaph wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:47 pmLikely the opposite. I think Pyxxy's vote going through decreases the chance of a tie by ensuring the number of people with relevant votes is odd. Assuming his vote goes through, we can only tie if one of the vote changing tags is off the wagons and the other is on the right wagon to make a difference. As for why he didn't vote earlier, I'm not entirely sure. @Pyxxy, if you haven't said already, why didn't you vote earlier?
One random thought is if Pyxxy and Byz are scum, does Pyxxy intentionally vote just after the deadline so that he can 'vote' for scum knowing his vote will be invalid?
I did consider the fake bus possibility, but ultimately I don't think that's likely to garner any cred, and it's quite the thing to come up with under pressure and with votes flying, so I don't think it's that likely.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
that was mePrincess Neon wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:25 pmSounds like Chicago lolBonatogether wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:20 pmmaybe on beta west coast
just recently i got passed in the right hand lane while going 75 in a 55
I was doing 80 in a 55 and someone absolutely rocketed past me I decided to speed up to see how fast they were going. 125 BTW lol
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 4:25 pm
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
On the subject of adding value, I went over Neon's posts and she feels active and here, but not particularly in the value column. (at least from my own subjective interpretation) Sabi by contrast, actually feels like they are attempting to contribute value in theirs.Rumi Tobari wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:51 pmThis kind of thinking is why earlier (like in the page 80 or so range) I mentioned I was more incliend to trust you vs damo or Pyx, despite your relative lack of posting, it felt like you were adding value with your posts, whereas theirs didn't feel like they were.
Also, speaking of damo, damo had some back and forth with Neon and seemed to think Neon scumslipped at one point. Given that damo turned out to be town, I'm curious if this was just some kind of meme, or if it reflects on Neon.
Or, and sorry about this Eden, if damo was actually referring to you. This was during the whole Neon and Eden are the same person thing.damo666 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:23 pmNo.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:37 pm@Damo666: Are you arguing that President Eden and Princess Neon are scum together?
If yes, why do you think that?
If no, why are you voting for Princess Neon?
N/a.
Partly the scumslip, mostly for giggles.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
You therefore do not think this, which you said an hour ago?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:44 pmHe was driving and wants to spend time with his family.
It is a pretty big flip flop to go from “bang to rights” (I thought the phrase was dead to rights but whatever) and “plain, indisputable facts” to thinking that his justification for failing to contribute to EOD was completely valid. And all it took was me pointing out that my assertion only holds water if Byz/snowy is scum, which you believe and I do not.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:19 pmBy the way, post edits or not, Bo_Sox has Rdrivera bang to rights here.
Rdrivera said he'd be around at EoD to break a tie if that was a risk.
There was a tie, or the risk of a tie, in the last few minutes to EoD.
Rdrivera was around at EoD.
Rdrivera did nothing to attempt to break the tie.
Plain, indisputable facts.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
You're so serious. Calm down Jamie.bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 7:01 pmYou therefore do not think this, which you said an hour ago?
It is a pretty big flip flop to go from “bang to rights” (I thought the phrase was dead to rights but whatever) and “plain, indisputable facts” to thinking that his justification for failing to contribute to EOD was completely valid. And all it took was me pointing out that my assertion only holds water if Byz/snowy is scum, which you believe and I do not.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:19 pmBy the way, post edits or not, Bo_Sox has Rdrivera bang to rights here.
Rdrivera said he'd be around at EoD to break a tie if that was a risk.
There was a tie, or the risk of a tie, in the last few minutes to EoD.
Rdrivera was around at EoD.
Rdrivera did nothing to attempt to break the tie.
Plain, indisputable facts.
Ok so I actually think, to be honest, that you've exposed a strange inconsistency in Rdr's behaviour, whatever the reason. I would speculate that he was paralysed by indecision and didn't want to be seen saving a team mate?
Potato, potato; potato.
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
After I asked ghug to be an admin with me he told me he preferred oatmeal raisin over chocolate chip. That was the final strawVecna wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:48 pmghug has opinions?bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:42 pmIf I were going to ban you for having opinions I would have to ban productive members of our site that have opinions such as Mapleleaf, Draugnar, Tettleton’s Chew, and ghugRumi Tobari wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:39 pm
Okay everyone. Let's all shut the fuck up. Because this is not productive at all.
I was wrong for having opinions. Like always before the banhammer drops. I apologize. I won't do it again.
Instead of doing this petty thing where we back and forth. Lets actually discuss relevent shit. Admittedly my only example of relevence is where the fuck was rdr at tiebreak?
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
What are your thoughts on Jamie and if I remember right pyxxy immediately jumping on board after I presented the case?President Eden wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:48 pmI think I buy rivera just being busy and driving at EOD. I’m pretty sure I’m stealing this thought from somebody else but can’t be fucked to look up who—but someone said that if he were mafia, he would know the alignments of the wagons and know where he needed his vote to be, so he wouldn’t just randomly check in and then not move his vote unless his vote were right where it needed to be from the mafia’s perspective. I don’t see any inherent reason why his explanation is implausible. It doesn’t have to be true, but it passes the BS test to me
Re: MAFIA 75: TROUBLE AT THE PRECINCT [HIDDEN]
Hi Celaph!celaph wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:47 pmLikely the opposite. I think Pyxxy's vote going through decreases the chance of a tie by ensuring the number of people with relevant votes is odd. Assuming his vote goes through, we can only tie if one of the vote changing tags is off the wagons and the other is on the right wagon to make a difference. As for why he didn't vote earlier, I'm not entirely sure. @Pyxxy, if you haven't said already, why didn't you vote earlier?
One random thought is if Pyxxy and Byz are scum, does Pyxxy intentionally vote just after the deadline so that he can 'vote' for scum knowing his vote will be invalid?
I wrote a partial explanation somewhere in the beginning of N1 but I refreshed and saw it wasn't tied, posted about not moving then refreshed my bot tab and the bot said it was tied, so I tried to rush back to the thread to vote to avoid a tie but the bot didn't have Vecna's re-re-flip yet
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat