Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
When voting for lump, most people just voted the person they thought was towniest or the best at scumhunting. Damo took a different approach though. He made a list of everyone, and systematically took them off his list for various reasons, leaving about six people, from which he picked Rdrivera.
This would be a great idea actually, except that his reasons sucked. He took people off his list for proposing bad ideas around mechanics and for misreading/misinterpreting the rules. I asked him why he took three people off his list for misinterpreting the rules and he never really gave me an answer. I think he said at one point he couldn't trust them, but never said why.
It looks like he wanted to lump vote a specific person, but couldn't come up with a good reason to vote them, and so he did this roundabout thing with sucky reasons to try to justify his vote.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I say I dont particularly blame people for not having rock-solid reasons for voting someone at this stage of the game, with so little content offered by most.
The fact you are miraculously expecting that, without offering any of yourself Bo....well.
I really couldnt care less about lynching Ezio or ND here I guess.
The fact you are miraculously expecting that, without offering any of yourself Bo....well.
I really couldnt care less about lynching Ezio or ND here I guess.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Like I had a little bit the same response as bo to the Ezio wagon, but I dont get why he is THIS HEAVILY against the wagon.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Bo are you still voting worcej? I'm still not enthused with his play and could join you if it gets a counterwagon going. This day one play has sucked. Lots of people just coasting, proposing terrible mechanics ideas, and the leading wagon is on Ezio.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I offered a case on worcej. Obviously, as usual, nobody cared. I put forward a platform for voting within y2k-Jamie-damo-bozo but there is no momentum on any of them other than damo, which is why I am hoping to explore that avenue.Vecna wrote: ↑Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:15 pmI say I dont particularly blame people for not having rock-solid reasons for voting someone at this stage of the game, with so little content offered by most.
The fact you are miraculously expecting that, without offering any of yourself Bo....well.
I really couldnt care less about lynching Ezio or ND here I guess.
That said, we're nowhere near a majority on anyone but Ezio and I am not voting him, so I'm trying to gauge where momentum is otherwise.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I have the feeling the bot is really mixing up all the LUMP and normal votes
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
So you think he's trying to avoid starting something? I'm not clear on this.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:14 pmWhen voting for lump, most people just voted the person they thought was towniest or the best at scumhunting. Damo took a different approach though. He made a list of everyone, and systematically took them off his list for various reasons, leaving about six people, from which he picked Rdrivera.
This would be a great idea actually, except that his reasons sucked. He took people off his list for proposing bad ideas around mechanics and for misreading/misinterpreting the rules. I asked him why he took three people off his list for misinterpreting the rules and he never really gave me an answer. I think he said at one point he couldn't trust them, but never said why.
It looks like he wanted to lump vote a specific person, but couldn't come up with a good reason to vote them, and so he did this roundabout thing with sucky reasons to try to justify his vote.
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I do not have any strong scum reads, but I think it is worth trying to get to 7 votes to potentially activate the Vig. DoubtingThomas is still my first choice, but I think ND is an OK option, and I would still be willing to vote Ezio.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I think all of Damo, Jamiet and Bozo have done minor things recently that make me think lynching them is probably bad.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Ok we need more common vote counts than this.
I'm pretty sure at most two of the people who jumped on me are scum, probably exactly two. Gimme a sec to try to figure out which 2 are most likely.
##call gm can we get wn updated vote count and lump count?
I'm pretty sure at most two of the people who jumped on me are scum, probably exactly two. Gimme a sec to try to figure out which 2 are most likely.
##call gm can we get wn updated vote count and lump count?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
Lynching me would be bad.
It would make Vecna sad.
It's a fact, write it down.
Jamie's one of the Town.
It would make Vecna sad.
It's a fact, write it down.
Jamie's one of the Town.
Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread
I think he was trying to lump vote Rdrivera without openly coming out and saying I town read Rdrivera.bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:21 pmSo you think he's trying to avoid starting something? I'm not clear on this.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:14 pmWhen voting for lump, most people just voted the person they thought was towniest or the best at scumhunting. Damo took a different approach though. He made a list of everyone, and systematically took them off his list for various reasons, leaving about six people, from which he picked Rdrivera.
This would be a great idea actually, except that his reasons sucked. He took people off his list for proposing bad ideas around mechanics and for misreading/misinterpreting the rules. I asked him why he took three people off his list for misinterpreting the rules and he never really gave me an answer. I think he said at one point he couldn't trust them, but never said why.
It looks like he wanted to lump vote a specific person, but couldn't come up with a good reason to vote them, and so he did this roundabout thing with sucky reasons to try to justify his vote.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users