Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#221 Post by damo666 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:04 pm

Bozo's Vecna lump vote confuses me so....

##VOTE Worcej

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#222 Post by Vecna » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:09 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 1:54 pm
Vecna wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:36 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 4:38 am
DoubtingThomas spent a lot of time defending a comment he made about a Squigs post, that looked defensive to me, and I do not remember DoubtingThomas looking defensive in previous games as town.

##VOTE DoubtingThomas
LOL. You must not have read a single post of DT in those previous games if you think he wasnt defensive. Sure hes even more defensive here with his enormous wall on Ezio, but I can totally see most of it coming from a towny place.
I did not reread those games but I do not remember him going to so much effort in response one question. Also, his initial post looks like he is buddying Squigs for no reason.
Good, you passed the test.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#223 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:18 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:15 pm
This is what I have for everyone latest Lump vote:

bo_sox:
bozo: rdrivera
damo: rdrivera
DoubtingThomas:
Ezio: Ezio
Jamie:
ND:
rdrivera: rdrivera
Squigs:
Vecna:
worcej: Vecna
y2kjbk: Ezio
yavuzovic: damo

Are there any mistakes? I have rdrivera leading Ezio 3-2.
I voted for Vecna to have Lump, so this list is wrong.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#224 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:21 pm

Lynch vote:
bo_sox: worcej
bozo: DoubtingThomas
damo: worcej
DoubtingThomas: Ezio
Ezio: bo_sox
Jamie:
ND: DoubtingThomas
rdrivera: bozo
Squigs: damo
Vecna: y2kjbk
worcej:
y2kjbk: Ezio
yavuzovic: bozo

Unless we want the Judge to decide the lynch, we need to consolidate on a wagon. Of the four players with 2 votes, my choice would be DoubtingThomas or Ezio. I do not think worcej would risk arguing for a no lynch as scum, and lynching me is a bad idea.

Lump vote:
bo_sox:
bozo: Vecna
damo: Vecna
DoubtingThomas:
Ezio: Ezio
Jamie: Vecna
ND:
rdrivera: rdrivera
Squigs:
Vecna: Vecna
worcej: Vecna
y2kjbk: DoubtingThomas
yavuzovic: damo

I think we should give Lump to someone who wants it, and Vecna says he wants it. The Lump vote does not have to be a majority, so it looks like Vecna will get Lump.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#225 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:24 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:18 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:15 pm
This is what I have for everyone latest Lump vote:

bo_sox:
bozo: rdrivera
damo: rdrivera
DoubtingThomas:
Ezio: Ezio
Jamie:
ND:
rdrivera: rdrivera
Squigs:
Vecna:
worcej: Vecna
y2kjbk: Ezio
yavuzovic: damo

Are there any mistakes? I have rdrivera leading Ezio 3-2.
I voted for Vecna to have Lump, so this list is wrong.
Thanks, I have made this correction.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#226 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:24 pm

I'm totally up with an Ezio vote. He looks scummy, is overly interested in himself, and hasn't addressed Thomas's case.

##Vote.Ezio

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#227 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:25 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:24 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:18 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:15 pm
This is what I have for everyone latest Lump vote:

bo_sox:
bozo: rdrivera
damo: rdrivera
DoubtingThomas:
Ezio: Ezio
Jamie:
ND:
rdrivera: rdrivera
Squigs:
Vecna:
worcej: Vecna
y2kjbk: Ezio
yavuzovic: damo

Are there any mistakes? I have rdrivera leading Ezio 3-2.
I voted for Vecna to have Lump, so this list is wrong.
Thanks, I have made this correction.
Sorry Bozo yes I was still catching up.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#228 Post by damo666 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:25 pm

OK bozo, I agree we need a wagon so

##VOTE EZIO

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#229 Post by damo666 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:26 pm

Btw any news on Peterbot?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#230 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:37 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:21 pm
How are flips the only inherently valuable information we get from a lynch? There are patterns, and we can discern those patterns with or without the immediate knowledge of who actually went down, not to mention we can judge intentions and question people on their motivations to get better reads down the road. If we don't lynch, we're sitting on our hands. Besides, a 3/13 chance is a chance that we can make much stronger for ourselves by scumhunting and playing a good game.

What definitive information do we get from letting the witches decide things? Why are we supposed to let the witches decide what information we can derive? Control is the one thing that we have going for us early on in this game.

The "no lynching is dumb" logic is good logic in this game too. Your logic is giving the witches the upper hand and letting them decide what we know, not to mention ensuring that they have no pressure on them and don't have to do anything that might expose them in order to cover their own hides or save their partners. I can only think of one reason why you would propose this whole deal and you haven't changed my mind one bit.
So, keeping in mind Witches are able to talk to each other on their QT during the day, I think the value of 'reading' into posts and detecting patterns is weaker than a normal mafia game. Maybe I am being silly about digging so deeply into the mechanics, but my logic keeps arriving to the logical conclusion that letting witches go first is best. This is because at least in Mafia, you definitively know who you lynched once the day ends - with this, it's all speculation.

You feel like we have control, but our 'control' can be so easily manipulated by 3 coordinated players. I am highly suspect of your opinions on this and, because I tend to do this, I am going with OMGUS on you and ##vote Bo because I think you're more about ensuring a lynch occurs than entertaining the notion of a mislynch/random hit is more damaging in this than mafia.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#231 Post by Squigs44 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:38 pm

Reads:
bo_sox: null
bozo: null/scum
damo: lean scum
DoubtingThomas: null/town
Ezio: lean town
Jamie: null/scum
ND: null
rdrivera: lean town
Squigs: town
Vecna: null/town
worcej: null/scum
y2kjbk: null/town
yavuzovic: null/scum

I'd be fine with Rdrivera, Vecna, or Ezio as lump. They all seem to want it and they all seem more town than scum. They are all decent scumhunters. Unfortunately, there are only so many roles that would want the lump vote, and so I think it is likely one of those three is scum. I really don't think an Ezio Lynch is a good idea though.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#232 Post by Squigs44 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:42 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:37 pm
bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:21 pm
How are flips the only inherently valuable information we get from a lynch? There are patterns, and we can discern those patterns with or without the immediate knowledge of who actually went down, not to mention we can judge intentions and question people on their motivations to get better reads down the road. If we don't lynch, we're sitting on our hands. Besides, a 3/13 chance is a chance that we can make much stronger for ourselves by scumhunting and playing a good game.

What definitive information do we get from letting the witches decide things? Why are we supposed to let the witches decide what information we can derive? Control is the one thing that we have going for us early on in this game.

The "no lynching is dumb" logic is good logic in this game too. Your logic is giving the witches the upper hand and letting them decide what we know, not to mention ensuring that they have no pressure on them and don't have to do anything that might expose them in order to cover their own hides or save their partners. I can only think of one reason why you would propose this whole deal and you haven't changed my mind one bit.
So, keeping in mind Witches are able to talk to each other on their QT during the day, I think the value of 'reading' into posts and detecting patterns is weaker than a normal mafia game. Maybe I am being silly about digging so deeply into the mechanics, but my logic keeps arriving to the logical conclusion that letting witches go first is best. This is because at least in Mafia, you definitively know who you lynched once the day ends - with this, it's all speculation.

You feel like we have control, but our 'control' can be so easily manipulated by 3 coordinated players. I am highly suspect of your opinions on this and, because I tend to do this, I am going with OMGUS on you and ##vote Bo because I think you're more about ensuring a lynch occurs than entertaining the notion of a mislynch/random hit is more damaging in this than mafia.
Stop this worcej. It isn't a good idea at all.

What information does a witch NK give us? They could just kill the lump guy and we gain 0 info. The witches get to know the role of the person they killed though, and now their influence is 3/12 instead of 3/13. No Lynch means oracle doesn't get his info as well. I'm struggling to see how you think town gets more info from a no-lynch. They get less info!

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#233 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:49 pm

##VOTE Ezio

We do not have a lot of time to try to get someone to 7 votes.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#234 Post by worcej » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:50 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:42 pm
Stop this worcej. It isn't a good idea at all.

What information does a witch NK give us? They could just kill the lump guy and we gain 0 info. The witches get to know the role of the person they killed though, and now their influence is 3/12 instead of 3/13. No Lynch means oracle doesn't get his info as well. I'm struggling to see how you think town gets more info from a no-lynch. They get less info!
The fundamental difference is I don't think the 3/13 percent shot of getting a witch right now is worth taking without any other information gained by us. We could just as easily hit the Priest, Oracle, Vig, Graverobber, and Clown (the roles I think are actually valuable for hunting) and are in fact more likely to hit them then a witch.

I can tell it isn't taking off since no one is engaging with the idea, so I am content with letting it happen - it's just a mistake IMO.

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#235 Post by bozotheclown » Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:55 pm

Lynch vote:
bo_sox: worcej
bozo: Ezio
damo: Ezio
DoubtingThomas: Ezio
Ezio: bo_sox
Jamie: Ezio
ND: DoubtingThomas
rdrivera: bozo
Squigs: damo
Vecna: y2kjbk
worcej: bo_sox
y2kjbk: Ezio
yavuzovic: bozo

Ezio: 5 votes
bo_sox: 2 votes
bozo: 2 votes
damo: 1 vote
DoubtingThomas: 1 vote
worcej: 1 vote
y2kjbk: 1 vote

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#236 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:05 pm

damo666 wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:21 pm
As rdr doesn't want it

##LUMPVOTE VECNA
I didn't said I don't want it, the only sure thing I have is my alignment. I said if you guys want a lump that is also a leader I am not the best choice. This said, I think Vecna is a good choice even risking him to be an early NK.

##lumpvote Vecna

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#237 Post by damo666 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:09 pm

apologies for the misinterpretation rdrivera, anyway I think Vecna ia a good choice for lump

Vecna
Posts: 12820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#238 Post by Vecna » Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:13 pm

Seeing the people voting Ezio, im really not so sure I want to lynch that boi.

Thoughts Rdrivera?

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#239 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:14 pm

I can vote for Ezio If we need a majority (otherwise we just give the decision to the Judge, that might choose the most voted unless he has a better reason to not do so, like he being the most voted), just didn't find DT case soo compelling and want to hear from him before hanging him.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

#240 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:17 pm

Vecna wrote:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:13 pm
Seeing the people voting Ezio, im really not so sure I want to lynch that boi.

Thoughts Rdrivera?
Just saw your message after I posted. I don't have a strong scumread on him and I don't think letting the Judge decide is a bad idea (at least today when we are sure he is alive) so maybe we can avoid this early consolidate and have a real EOD.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users