luckily we’re looking at like half a dozen people and not tunneling exclusively on Maniac. the only person who got zeroed in on hard was celaph, who flipped mafia.brainbomb wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:19 pmmafia games are lost by looking exclusively at one player and saying that in every action this person helped scums interest. ive seen countless examples of people piling on and just being wrong and that spirals into six phasesPresident Eden wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:14 pmI wouldn’t say indisputable, but yes at some point when a player has played exactly according to mafia interests at every critical phase of the game, you don’t have a choice but to resolve their alignment one way or another.brainbomb wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:10 pmI think the obsession with Maniac being scum thing relies on the notion that Maniac chose every single exact action which only helps scum and therefore it is just too improbable to envision that he just made all the wrong choices
and I say this having read celaph posts about Maniac and in now way do I see celaph talking about a scumteam member in that celaph iso.
so basically were saying it isnt about celaphs posts about maniac. thats all wifom.
all that matters is maniac acted in scums interest in every phase of the process so hes indisputably scum.
which if you really think about is the perfect miskill for scum because theres really no defense for the actions. Maniac can say he felt this way at this time and no matter what he says people will think its obfuscation
that’s why I’ve been couching it as “resolve Maniac/Lamp,” because IMO if Maniac is town and just accidentally shilled for scum all game, then Lamp looks like the one trying to convert that into a miskill
of dead town in a row and boom suddenly its a runaway maf win because people followed their noses onto people who didnt assert themselves or got too much wrong to be able to trust.
now granted town following its nose is what youre supposed to do. you dont play the wild theory game you do what makes the most sense. I like the idea that people just play like shit and thats part of the game. scum are more precise and tend to not leave so many skid marks in their underwear for all to see on the clothes line
I think caution in this matter is wise, but shouldn’t lead to inaction.
and for anybody who actually read my case on ghug, compare how ghug and brainbomb make the same point. both are ostensibly worried about people coasting on early reads and failing to zero in on mafia playing well enough to avoid major suspicion. but ghug does so by shading every clear town in the game for wildly wrong reasons, leaving open potential miskills later and bringing no constructive alternative to the table. brainbomb is worried about Maniac being miskilled and is actively looking to present an alternate theory to avoid this outcome. the difference in agendas is night and day