That's a did not vote list, not a scum list brainbombbrainbomb wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 3:35 amthis looks like a post with Jamie listing celaph as his top scumread and yet this seems to just never be something Jamie cares aboutJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 6:00 pmcelaph
Kakarroto
worcej
pyxxy
rdrivera2005
Remember that Bob has sensibly re-instated the "Must Vote" rule despite the meddling of the Council, so you will need to vote.
M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Bona looks good, blamp doesn't. Celaph defending his team mate blamp.....?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 12:40 pmBlamp doesn't +1 much. The assumption behind this post is fundamentally flawed for this reason.celaph wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:30 amI skimmed Blamp's +1s and saw no evidence that he was in the thread reading at that time. Now, he certainly could have been aware that people might monitor that and consciously didn't +1, but at that point why is he not just hiding himself or reading straight from the bot? I find it far more likely that he just had the tab open in the background while going about his day.BesharamSabi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 3:48 am
Hmm I do find this interesting because blamp was online in bottom bar for a good part of the real time night part of night one.
Interesting.
Could point to a fear kill?
This is also a towny-seeming take on the face of it but no actually towny thought was required to make it.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
That I'm very confused about why did celaph try to save kak?
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
cause scum can do whatever quirky shit they wantBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:10 amThat I'm very confused about why did celaph try to save kak?
if scum purely tried to save other scum, it'd be so clear who they were, so they necessarily have to be protecting some town in order to keep up the facade
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Tbf all of that drama was something that took up my whole day. Currently there's no discord drama nor am I with family or it's the holidays. The only distraction I have right now is work but I am playing mafia around that and have been as active and engaged with the game as I can be without my work being affected.brainbomb wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:49 pmthe best compliment I can give sabi about this game compared to the scumgame is that every 4th post is not to tell us theyre on their way to the dentist or that some drama happened on some other server or that something outside the game is more important.
they arent using out of game crap to evade the thread
But you can scum read that too.
Regardless anything I do will be scum read.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
That's fair. Just confused by it even tho your explanation makes sense.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:25 amcause scum can do whatever quirky shit they wantBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:10 amThat I'm very confused about why did celaph try to save kak?
if scum purely tried to save other scum, it'd be so clear who they were, so they necessarily have to be protecting some town in order to keep up the facade
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Haven't checked the bot but I knew there was a three way tie between Maniac vs celaph vs tfb.
What, or should I specify who, caused everyone to jump ship from Maniac on to celaph?
What, or should I specify who, caused everyone to jump ship from Maniac on to celaph?
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Eden why did you have issues with ghug questioning Bona towncore but not brain saying something similar about Nona?
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
the answer to this depends on whether you read my post (beyond skimming to see that accusing ghug based in part on his statements about Bona) or notBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:33 amEden why did you have issues with ghug questioning Bona towncore but not brain saying something similar about Nona?
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
it’s fully ok to admit you didn’t, it’s fucking massive I know. but I need to know whether there’s some part of it that needs explaining and wasn’t clear originally, or if you feel it doesn’t come to a clear enough conclusion, or what.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
There's way too much in here for responding to every minor point and aside to be worthwhile, so I'm just going to address it as a whole. If you've got any specific point you want me to respond to, I'm happy to oblige, but most of the shipments you're making about individual people (e.g. my comments on data analysis being scummy) don't make any sense.
I have seen town repeatedly lose games by refusing to consider people because they voted for scum early. If you want specific examples, consider Donny last game or Chaqa in the 3v11 game. My issue with your post was with the fact that you were doing that at all, and I criticized it with a few comments on the specific propra in question and a general comment on the meta. The goal wasn't to shade everyone on the celaph wagons, or to give my current thoughts on scum, it was to note that it's ridiculous to just sit there and lock them all as town. You're saying I'm scummy—beyond the questionable nitpicking of semantics—because I'm trying to fill your attempts at establishing a towncore, bit I'm not nefariously picking at the seams to undermine your goal. I'm saying plainly that I think writing of half the game as town is a bad idea.
You can look at past games to see me making this attachment repeatedly after we catch scum early. It's not scum motivated. I just disagree with you, and for good reason.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I haven't read it yet but I will.President Eden wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:38 amthe answer to this depends on whether you read my post (beyond skimming to see that accusing ghug based in part on his statements about Bona) or notBesharamSabi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:33 amEden why did you have issues with ghug questioning Bona towncore but not brain saying something similar about Nona?
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I will write out my comments and questions when I read it. I'm still trying to reread day 2President Eden wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:39 amit’s fully ok to admit you didn’t, it’s fucking massive I know. but I need to know whether there’s some part of it that needs explaining and wasn’t clear originally, or if you feel it doesn’t come to a clear enough conclusion, or what.
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Now im researching macca/worcej and their mentions of
celaph
celaph
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Will have details in the morning. Gonna take a shower and compile
my thoughts later this phase
my thoughts later this phase
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Blamp why did you stop doing the town council thing? It was a pro town and winning strategy last game?
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
Crawling out these sheets to see another day
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
It’d be helpful if you took a couple of examples and showed me, but it’s not really important. Your call. I also think the examples are just indicative of the trend, but if you really are town somehow and not just mafia busted trying to push an agenda, then explaining your examples better would probably help illustrate that.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:43 amThere’s way too much in here for responding to every minor point and aside to be worthwhile, so I’m just going to address it as a whole. If you’ve got any specific point you want me to respond to, I’m happy to oblige, but most of the shipments you’re making about individual people (e.g. my comments on data analysis being scummy) don’t make any sense.
There are a number of issues here.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:43 amI have seen town repeatedly lose games by refusing to consider people because they voted for scum early. If you want specific examples, consider Donny last game or Chaqa in the 3v11 game. My issue with your post was with the fact that you were doing that at all, and I criticized it with a few comments on the specific propra in question and a general comment on the meta. The goal wasn’t to shade everyone on the celaph wagons, or to give my current thoughts on scum, it was to note that it’s ridiculous to just sit there and lock them all as town. You’re saying I’m scummy—beyond the questionable nitpicking of semantics—because I’m trying to fill your attempts at establishing a towncore, bit I’m not nefariously picking at the seams to undermine your goal. I’m saying plainly that I think writing of half the game as town is a bad idea.
(1) I’m not saying never ever look at these guys ever under any circumstances forever. They could immediately fuck off and do nothing for 5 day/night cycles and not die while we miss on a bunch of people in a row, and at that point it’d be fairly apparent that we need to review them. But for now it’s pretty obvious that they don’t need to be looked at, and you’re just fronting here with this checks and balances act to masquerade the fact that you’re mafia and it’s your agenda to disrupt the formation of a town core off of us killing your teammate.
(2) The reason towns failed to catch Chaqa and Donny is exactly the opposite of what you’re purporting happened. They didn’t fail because they wrongly town cleared Chaqa and Donny. They failed because they wrongly didn’t town clear several other people who were clear town and in fact killed them instead. They should have been able to town clear Maniac off of the innocent scan + his own behavior. They killed him instead. If memory serves, town killed both aaro and Bona incorrectly near the end of Chaqa’s game because they got paranoid and didn’t trust their town reads of the new guys. WebDip towns implode because of the exact paranoia you’re trying to spread all the time. It’s a running joke in every god chat ever that an inexplicable town implosion is inevitable.
(3) You are grotesquely exaggerating the numbers. Four people is not half the game. It is half of half the game. You have doubled the number of people I’m allegedly trying to 100% clear for the rest of the game to frame it as some kind of big problem. I anticipate you’ll rebut this by calling it semantics, but your consistently sweeping word choice betrays your agenda. You aren’t motivated to be precise enough to turn your superficially appealing critique into a meaningful alternate proposal that can be synthesized into a real solution. You’re just shading progress. As I described someone (Boat maybe? and possibly wrongly…) earlier, it’s the difference between someone having a different vision for how to accomplish a project and someone just saying “no” and stonewalling the project into oblivion.
When you’re town I can usually count on you to needlessly detract from a correct townread yes (

You didn’t do any of that here. You’re posing like you were just trying to help round out my starting point by providing some much needed deliberate check on a rash set of conclusions, but you didn’t do that. You just shaded everybody I called out and then peaced until I wrote a Tolstoyan epic about it.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Why is this sus? Decision trees are important aspect of Mafia. It helps figure out all the avenues of the game from every kill decision.BusinessLamp wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:57 pmhonestly a bit sus to me that chaqa gave into the pressure of people asking him to do the "what if celaph is scum" "what if celaph is town" analysis instead of just continuing to be lazy LOL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hominidae