M73 - Fowl Play - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

[BusinessLamp]

i think im

chaqa>celaph>demon

at this point. debating first two

[President Eden]

The non-contributor group is Rdrivera, Kak and Worcej.

Everyone else has done at least something that might help us to sort them.

Kak has most certainly contributed

I disagree. Other than the single isolated example of the "Theory Time" post, what other contributions has Kak made?

you said something

that is something

and it only takes one post full of townie paranoia to contribute at times

[celaph]

my reads after first skim are that I stan Eden

Why do you stan Eden? I agree with Sabi's earlier comments that it's incredibly bizarre how a full half of your posts have been focused on dem and yet your primary read take away is from about Eden.

i stanned eden because of how they engaged with sabi at the time. pressuring sabi early is more likely to be revealing bc they are more emotive and reactive. also the "i didnt check my role" stuff just bothers me on a game rules level

I like how this fits with both your early focus on Sabi and with your choice of the word stan. Feels quite honest.

[snowy801]

Kak wagon stinks big time

##Vote ghug

Why tf are you voting for ghug. He's been the least shit posty person so far in this game.

Is it your belief that not shitposting is town indicative?

[Bonatogether]

my reasoning - already posted. Keep up Sabi, this wasn't even that long ago.

as for how he's matching his scum meta, he's being jokey, he's being fluffy, and he's not engaging on a serious level on as many thing as normal. this is more typical of scum!celaph because he struggles with approximating towny thoughts as scum but needs to keep up posting.

But you're scumreading him. This is moving the goalposts. You can scumread multiple people at once, but you're limited to only one vote.

also you only stopped voting blamp 20 minutes ago

Because I realized it's not worth killing him day one when he's actually contributing to the game.

so you prefer to kill lowposters over scumreads?

[BesharamSabi]

my reasoning - already posted. Keep up Sabi, this wasn't even that long ago.

as for how he's matching his scum meta, he's being jokey, he's being fluffy, and he's not engaging on a serious level on as many thing as normal. this is more typical of scum!celaph because he struggles with approximating towny thoughts as scum but needs to keep up posting.

But you're scumreading him. This is moving the goalposts. You can scumread multiple people at once, but you're limited to only one vote.

You haven't listened examples. Just a vague explanation. I want examples of this.

at least i'm not claiming it's my gut and i can't come up with other reasons lol

So far this is you repackaging your gut reasoning.

If you are so anti gut reasoning then please list the concrete examples of this.

[Bonatogether]

Why do you stan Eden? I agree with Sabi's earlier comments that it's incredibly bizarre how a full half of your posts have been focused on dem and yet your primary read take away is from about Eden.

i stanned eden because of how they engaged with sabi at the time. pressuring sabi early is more likely to be revealing bc they are more emotive and reactive. also the "i didnt check my role" stuff just bothers me on a game rules level

I like how this fits with both your early focus on Sabi and with your choice of the word stan. Feels quite honest.

@sabi: see for fluffy celaph posts

[BesharamSabi]

Kak wagon stinks big time

##Vote ghug

Why tf are you voting for ghug. He's been the least shit posty person so far in this game.

Is it your belief that not shitposting is town indicative?

He's trying to get town to focus on hunting. He's not distracting town. So yes.

[Bonatogether]

You haven't listened examples. Just a vague explanation. I want examples of this.

at least i'm not claiming it's my gut and i can't come up with other reasons lol

So far this is you repackaging your gut reasoning.

If you are so anti gut reasoning then please list the concrete examples of this.

i gave you multiple concrete reasons

mad cause bad

[BesharamSabi]

at least i'm not claiming it's my gut and i can't come up with other reasons lol

So far this is you repackaging your gut reasoning.

If you are so anti gut reasoning then please list the concrete examples of this.

i gave you multiple concrete reasons

mad cause bad

You just showed me one example.

Where are the other examples.

I'm waiting Bona.

[Bonatogether]

So far this is you repackaging your gut reasoning.

If you are so anti gut reasoning then please list the concrete examples of this.

i gave you multiple concrete reasons

mad cause bad

You just showed me one example.

Where are the other examples.

I'm waiting Bona.

ok sabi

i'll get you something

[BesharamSabi]

i stanned eden because of how they engaged with sabi at the time. pressuring sabi early is more likely to be revealing bc they are more emotive and reactive. also the "i didnt check my role" stuff just bothers me on a game rules level

I like how this fits with both your early focus on Sabi and with your choice of the word stan. Feels quite honest.

@sabi: see for fluffy celaph posts

How is this fluffy? He's confirming his read on blamp and analyzing the interaction blamp had.

[DemonRHK]

because I didn’t push them

quit dodging my question. what are the wagons I was meant to be pushing instead. you don’t have an answer because you’re making shit up

Eden > D1 > Ctrl + F 'Sabi' > 86 results

I'm not dodging anything. What I am saying is you didn't bother to try to hunt anyone else. How about snowy with 80 posts and no content? More into this old game brain bs? Thouhgts on why people like Maniac and damo weren't contributing? Jamie's early game spat? Odd interactions with ghug, who even called you out for a lack of walls?

[BesharamSabi]

i gave you multiple concrete reasons

mad cause bad

You just showed me one example.

Where are the other examples.

I'm waiting Bona.

ok sabi

i'll get you something

Thank you. If you are so Gung ho about concrete evidence instead of vibes/gut then I want to see concrete stuff for all your reads.

[Bonatogether]

I like how this fits with both your early focus on Sabi and with your choice of the word stan. Feels quite honest.

@sabi: see for fluffy celaph posts

How is this fluffy? He's confirming his read on blamp and analyzing the interaction blamp had.

this is surface level 'wow you're going over the same points' and a quick thing tacked on the end.

[TheFlyingBoat]

this is the only thing of substance Kak has posted. I actually thought it was townie… I’ve taken the liberty of putting the things that jumped out to me in boldface. and underlined the big one. it would be nice to see why the people who are voting for him feel otherwise:

-) Eden and brainbomb - that dynamic felt a bit strange. Eden started there feeling a bit forced, it kinda felt like an early distancing move from two players of mafia. It remained strong for a few pages, though with the latest posts it doesn’t feel as strange and forced, maybe just a hiccup start. brainbomb leaving and then coming back before his own set time seems at first bad, but as mafia brain wouldn’t break his word so easily, would he? Maybe just a wrong blip, but if any one of those two turns out to be mafia, check the other one too.

-) Jamie and sabi - it might be just a big TvT argument but something tells me there is something wrong here. I really enjoyed playing with Jamie last game (even when I was forced to lie to you there, but even if you both would have caught me it was really enjoyable playing with you then - to be fair most of it was Donny’s preparation so I just tried to drive it home - anyway, what wanted I talk about … ah right) and this doesn’t feel as nice, but I kinda feel that comes from the influence from sabi. The first though I had there was, like above, that might be a mafia-mafia situation but I don’t get the overall tone from Jamie here. Maybe sabi is trying to rile up Jamie to have reason to maf-read him … or I’m completely misreading the situation because (as we know from my last game) I’m an ‘expert’ in human relations.

-) maniac - said that he doesn’t like eden’s posts (due to ‘subtlety and brevity’ of his posts if I’m not wrong?) but votes the same target (brainbomb) … is this a mafia-duo trying to distance from each other but voting to ‘guide’ town to vote for someone to a certain degree? Maybe even a mafia-trio throwing brain under the bus (hah … unintended) and get credit for it?

this stuff just screams town paranoia to me. if it’s in Kak’s mafia wheelhouse then it’s not exonerating I suppose, but I thought I remembered Kak presenting more controlled and conventional ideas when he was mafia.

I mean I said after I cast my vote on him I liked his one good post. But I think I'm pretty consistent in my pressure for not posting here. Rdr I've excused for carnival as I think choosing that over us is the only correct decision. I like pyxxy's posts even though he hasn't posted much. Shows good posts for a newbie. Maniac is Maniac and I've actually liked him quite a bit today. I've declared publicly my intent to vote Celaph and probably would be voting him right now to put some pressure there (parents weekend is a much shittier excuse than carnival) if Kak's response to my pressure wasn't to basically declare that he had no desire to participate today which is just terrible. I'm assuming he thought since it was such a minor wagon he didn't need to care but hopefully now he deigns us worthy of his time.

[Bonatogether]

Howdy!

Are you scum again son?

I was really scared to read my role pm, but we good lol.

I think I townlean PE for the way he has generated conversation. It gets information out there and his open hedginess ("we need to start somewhere") is understandable given the time.

oh bummer, I was ready to townlean you

town pass denied but you can have some compensatory +1s

I think I like this post even though I hate it.

What do you hate about it?

Why do you stan Eden? I agree with Sabi's earlier comments that it's incredibly bizarre how a full half of your posts have been focused on dem and yet your primary read take away is from about Eden.

i stanned eden because of how they engaged with sabi at the time. pressuring sabi early is more likely to be revealing bc they are more emotive and reactive. also the "i didnt check my role" stuff just bothers me on a game rules level

I like how this fits with both your early focus on Sabi and with your choice of the word stan. Feels quite honest.

[BesharamSabi]

I feel better about today. Feels less climbing an uphill battle. I feel a lot more confidence and less defensive/reactive.

[BusinessLamp]

will this just be me sheeping bona again

i feel like it had a 0% success rate last time LOL

[TheFlyingBoat]

because I didn’t push them

quit dodging my question. what are the wagons I was meant to be pushing instead. you don’t have an answer because you’re making shit up

Eden > D1 > Ctrl + F 'Sabi' > 86 results

I'm not dodging anything. What I am saying is you didn't bother to try to hunt anyone else. How about snowy with 80 posts and no content? More into this old game brain bs? Thouhgts on why people like Maniac and damo weren't contributing? Jamie's early game spat? Odd interactions with ghug, who even called you out for a lack of walls?

I mean did you analyze a lot of those posts? Plenty of them were just him coaching Sabi