I hate this but his blow-up and subsequent request for a subout is probably indicative of Jamie being town...
##vote ghug - back to my opposite theory.
#741 Post by worcej » Tue Aug 24, 2021 1:44 am
I hate this but his blow-up and subsequent request for a subout is probably indicative of Jamie being town...
#742 Post by ghug » Tue Aug 24, 2021 2:52 am
Jamie proved last game that hes capable of similarly pathetic losses of emotional control as scum. This was my gut reaction as well, but his response to us voting for him for reasons he perceived to not relate to his conduct in the game was very similar to his response to kgray dismissing what he had to say because she was confident he was scum.
#743 Post by ghug » Tue Aug 24, 2021 2:57 am
#744 Post by Bonatogether » Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:28 am
##vote ghug
#745 Post by ghug » Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:50 am
#746 Post by ghug » Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:15 am
#748 Post by BobMcBob » Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:20 am
#749 Post by Maniac » Tue Aug 24, 2021 8:41 am
#750 Post by Vecna » Tue Aug 24, 2021 8:52 am
Commented on it at the time, but this interaction is pretty interesting after an lfischl flip. Not sure how to interpret it, I remember as bona being quite crazy/fun that time he was scum.
While at the same time as Fox is questioning and prodding lfischl, Ghug is sitting here not interacting with it, trying to create something potentially? Its fitting the narrative on my part, but Id feel a bit uncomfortable if I saw my teammate lfischl get pressures In this spot.
Do like this Ghug post though.ghug wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:44 pmAh, this is the Maniac I was missing last game.Maniac wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:43 pmReading Jamie In isolation it’s interesting that he provided the data about high/low posters being voted off D1 (admittedly at my instigation) but it seems that he is now using our group bias to get target a low poster with spurious reasons like ‘seems of’. Getting easy D1 kills is not pro-town. ##vote Jamie
Interesting worcej observation. Lets look into how he follows up on it.
There sure was a lot of attention for that interaction. Note to check for followup and leadup to EoD as well. Pretty sure Bob never encouraged lfischl to do shit last game.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 4:44 ami love this post so much
but seriously lfischl, you need to start having more opinions
chuck out some gut feelings at least
Hmmm, interesting
And he actually responds to the request. With a post that is quite interesting in hindsight.lfischl wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:40 amIf one of ghug and jaime are scum then the other definitly is. If we were to vote one of them out and they were town then i think the other one would be town as well.
Hmm above post actually indicates that his big shitposting wall wasn’t as shitposty as it was last game, but that he’s actually looking for stuff to connect. Interesting.
More shots taken at lfischl, this time by jamiet. Unless the bus was the plan, this reflects pretty good.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 12:54 pmYes, it's Lfischl's reaction that's odd, in my opinion, Bob, not yours.
Reflects decently overall. Pro’s/cons seem genuine enough.
Interesting that he advocates for a replacement as opposed to just killing the slot.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 6:16 pm@Lfischl - why are you so absent, yet again?
Take part or sub out.
Why specifically a teammate though, Ghug?
Bit of a weak take. This was one of the very few rdr posts that actually tried to push an opinion, no?celaph wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 6:30 pmRdr's (albeit rather limited) posts this game feel like a productive town rdr.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 4:33 pmGhug could be buddying Bona, but it's now his usual style as scum. People that are usually a bit abrasive don't tend to try to buddy anyone as it would be too obvious.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:40 pm
As someone who said last game 'good job buddying me' to me after my mafiaflip and with this post, who would you say would've buddied you in this game (or is there no one)? Is there any duo right now who, you would say, seems to be buddying? Or someone who tries to buddy someone?
This wall feels like a pretty big effort to defend a scum teammate. Makes it feel less likely that Celaph was lfischl’s teammate.celaph wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:11 pmI find it interesting that you think I'm pushing back against townreads when I'm doing the exact opposite, pushing back against people's scumreads. I'm not confident in my own, but I'd like people to at least put forward good reasons for the wagons they are on. I was doing just that in 2 of the 4 posts you highlighted earlier.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:02 pmsince are you the one who's pushing back against townreads? usually you're doing something constructive
I'm challenging Kak's ghug/bona scumread because I don't see it.
@worcej, coming from anyone besides lfischl I would agree with you, but my memory is that lfischl has asked a number of literal surface level questions before like this.
I'm contesting worcej's read on lfischl as weird because it strikes me as normal lfischl.
One of the other two posts you quoted was when I agreed that Bob's last posts at the time were weird. I stand by that statement though since then his posts have returned to a more normal Bob. I'm keeping an eye on him, but don't have a strong desire to kill him today. The last one was me challenging lfischl's ghug/Jamie connection. I suppose you could interpret this as pushing back against a townread, but I see no indication about whether lfischl sees them as more likely t/t or s/s.
#751 Post by Vecna » Tue Aug 24, 2021 8:54 am
Why only mention jamiet as a possible scum though?celaph wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 8:18 pmUnless Jamie is scum, this hesitancy strikes me as town from Kak. ##unvoteKakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Aug 22, 2021 8:17 pmPhew, that is actually hard. I'm having the creeps right now from lfischl. Worcej isn't here, ok, something sunday and family (see last game), alright, but no word of it is kinda strange. And then ... hmm ... I'm kinda lost. Maybe celaph? Maybe jamie? Maybe bob? From the reactions per se, I'm not sure, but did bob try to buddy me? And maniac was kinda strange too, but that might be just strange strange. Or weird strange.
So probably lfischl, worcej and, with the current low energy situation, probably bob and cel/jamie are just the t vs t situation mafia would want to have? Sorry if I sound unsure but I guess I can't get a better feeling of the situation right now.
#752 Post by Kakarroto » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:00 am
#753 Post by Vecna » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:04 am
This seems like the pivotal moment where Ghug turned off the kakka as potential scum mindset, and maybe later on ignored his silly postings of over-the-top surprise after the night reveal?
#754 Post by Vecna » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:05 am
also pretty sure the bona progression on Celaph comes from a good place.
#755 Post by celaph » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:07 am
This post feels like town Jamie to me. He seems angry, but he is channeling that anger into something productive to try and solve the game.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:47 am@Worcej:
Come here and participate. It is no longer the weekend.
You have made 10 posts in the entire game so far.
Four of those 10 posts accuse me and Ghug of being scum together, without providing any reasoning for this view. Please would you explain why you hold this (incorrect) position?
#756 Post by celaph » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:08 am
#757 Post by Kakarroto » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:17 am
On a scale from 1 to 10, how glad are you that fox, who was voting you for reading you weak town/townleaning on you, was the night target?
#758 Post by celaph » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:19 am
As I said earlier:BobMcBob wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 12:29 pmmaniac not only provided more content than lfischl but also more towny contentcelaph wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:34 amYes, Maniac provided incredibly little content especially the latter half of that day.
As I noted above, I had commented on my reasons for not wanting to vote lfischl hence his exclusion here despite the obvious lack of content. Rdr is the other name that I didn't bring up mostly because I D1 bias rdr enough that I'm not inclined to kill him.
i would hardly characterise maniac as lurking yesterday
why was your approach so inexplicably different?
why did lfischl get a free pass for lurking just because he always does that?
I wasn't comparing lfischl to Maniac, I was comparing lfischl to past lfischl. I think more highly of both Maniac's scum and town play than I do of lfischl's. If I play purely off who I think has been the towniest, then I expect I'll miskill lfischl every game that he's town.celaph wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:23 amBecause I'm not sold on Bona's argument that lfischl is impossible to read. And it's not just because he posts so little. He has had a couple town games with many more posts where he still ends up getting killed quite quickly. I had a theory about his behavior being indicative of a normal, town, lfischl. Obviously I was wrong.
#760 Post by celaph » Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:19 am
ahhh, I misunderstood what you were saying. I agree scum worcej looks bad for Kak.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 12:31 pmthis was saying kak wouldve looked awful if worcej was scumcelaph wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:55 amWhy would it have looked worse if Worcej is scum? I feel like Jamie looks decent for calling out Kak's move to lfischl.
As is, I feel like it looks alright, but mostly because I don't expect that scum Jamie there is in the mindset there of accusing Kak knowing Kak is right.
which i stand by
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Ernst_Brenner, Google [Bot]