MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I think you are right and Bona is scum. I wasn't scumreading him because I didn't see much of a scum reason to challenge the cop claimant the way he did. But spending 3 days on it is a way to avoid doing any other thinking and this explanation he want to draw the NK is lame to say the least.foodcoats wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 12:17 pmI mean that you gave a rash, ill-considered answer that contradicts your iso and is untownie.
Let's look at what happens. Jamie had asked as below, and you responded thusly:
So, when you finally answer what your position on darg was, you say you were softing cop to draw the NK - nothing more.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 6:47 pmI was trying to softclaim cop to get scum to kill me but then kak went and did the same thing but more.
I then asked how that could make sense, given the way you attacked darg EOD1, where you made a case that suggested you were ignorant of there even being a cop - which obviously would tell the scum team you were NOT cop - and you responded thusly:
Okay, you changed your position over time. But how? Darg then asked about this to clarify, and you responded:Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 7:03 pmI changed my position over time but didn't say it so I could draw the nk.
So, what happens EON3/start of D4? The last thing you say on N3 about darg is:Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 7:23 pma) No.dargorygel wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 7:14 pmOk. Bona... This has been a copclaim day. I was surprised that kak claimed, in the light of Maniac (and me.) I suppose it's the only game I town. I plan to ask kak his process of thought. Later.
But I can ask you now. Did you believe me at first? When did you? When did you start to plan this? Can you help me understand?
b) End of night 3 I think.
c) I just thought "hey this would be good since a bunch of PRs have bitten the dust."
So at EON4, you are spewing that you are convinced darg is not cop because of a slip. This doesn't at all look like you are softing; it actually looks like you are hunting (just... not very well, because you are not considering anyone else's arguments about the scenario). So how did you expect scum to see you as "softing?"Bonatogether wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:52 amBut he doesn't claim what you said here - he claims that it's a typo.
Now, if we look at the beginning of D4, you say a bunch of things about how darg is scum - too many to include here, but I encourage all townies to look at Bona's D4. You do not in any way seem to be softing cop with any of the statements you make; rather, you make arguments about why darg is scum for claiming cop as he did on D1 and then for making a typo and writing "doc" instead of "cop." So in other words, you still seem to be hunting for scum - but you continue to ignore everyone else giving you reasons to believe darg is town.
My point is, it NEVER looks like you are softing cop. It looks like you are tunneled madly on darg. You also don't actually seem to evolve your position as you claim; rather, you just tunnel harder (while, again, ignoring contrary evidence).
So, why do I say you "flubbed" your case? I say that because Jamie and damo forced your hand to reply to a question you were avoiding, and you answered too quickly without looking back at what you had said and done - thus creating inconsistencies. You also answered in a totally untownie way; Jamie asked, "Can you please explain your view on darg. With a sensible explanation you can become strongtown;" and the ONLY thing you replied was that you were trying to draw the NK. If you were actually town, you would've seen what Jamie was actually asking and explain "At the end of N3, such-and-such evidence convinced me." Instead, you got defensive and came up with a bad answer that contradicts your ISO.
@Macca @celaph @rdr @yavu
Please tell us what you think of my case.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Jamie is likely town for the way he handled HB try, plus he has less chance to be scum, so he shouldn't be in this pool.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 2:29 pmScum have no day chat so multiple (3+) bussing seems highly unlikely.
Therefore we can assume AT LEAST 2 scum in
Jamie Macca Yav rdr
Voting outside this pool tomorrow would be suboptimal (44% v >= 50%).
People advocating voting outside this group should be viewed with great suspicion.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
If food is scum this game is over. I would never push his kill, he is the one doing most effort and it doesn't look like scum effort.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
This read are so bad I don't know even where to start. How Kgray defending Celaph is an indication both are scum?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 4:19 pmMy POE (in no particular order) is you, kgray, celaph, Chaqa, rdr.foodcoats wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 4:09 pmOkay, so let's say you're right.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 3:26 pm
Because your d1 posts felt not town and they have barely improved since.
In addition to me, who are the three remaining scum?
Can you please give us your four and your reasoning?
You for a persistent inability to be townie for more than 5 minutes at a time.
Kgray for bending over backwards to defend celaph in weird ways.
Kgray's defenses don't really make sense unless celaph is scum. Celaph also (as has been pointed out by others) hasn't put out the sort of reads that he did as town before. He did some d1 but not afterwards.
Chaqa has acted townie but I just can't get over the feeling that he might be scum. He fooled a lot of people last time as scum doing things not entirely dissimilar from what he's doing now.
rdr hasn't felt as probing or plain smart (I would say sharp but that is overused now) this game in a way similar to how Demon wasn't.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don't see much reason to post at night. Just could give scum more ideas. Everyone put work into your cases and post them at EoN, I think
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Why you think you are a town clear? D1 RB that could have been used on Vecna as no item was claimed?
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
The fact of the defending wasn't the scummy thing but how she did it was.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:37 pmThis read are so bad I don't know even where to start. How Kgray defending Celaph is an indication both are scum?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Fairrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:29 pmJamie is likely town for the way he handled HB try, plus he has less chance to be scum, so he shouldn't be in this pool.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 2:29 pmScum have no day chat so multiple (3+) bussing seems highly unlikely.
Therefore we can assume AT LEAST 2 scum in
Jamie Macca Yav rdr
Voting outside this pool tomorrow would be suboptimal (44% v >= 50%).
People advocating voting outside this group should be viewed with great suspicion.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Okrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:44 pmWhy you think you are a town clear? D1 RB that could have been used on Vecna as no item was claimed?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
@food, I've seen your posts and in line with Chaqa's recommendation will respond at EoN.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Congrats!kgray wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 5:51 pmI'm sorry for being awol everyone, I was playing Dip all day yesterday and the tourney kept me up until 4am. I did win though, so I am really not that apologetic![]()
I was going to try to catch up before getting some things done today, but I see that Hamilton is the werewolf and today's vote seems decided, so I will do that this evening.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I agree with rdr on this point and I think he looks good for trying to narrow a pool that he's also in.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:29 pmJamie is likely town for the way he handled HB try, plus he has less chance to be scum, so he shouldn't be in this pool.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 2:29 pmScum have no day chat so multiple (3+) bussing seems highly unlikely.
Therefore we can assume AT LEAST 2 scum in
Jamie Macca Yav rdr
Voting outside this pool tomorrow would be suboptimal (44% v >= 50%).
People advocating voting outside this group should be viewed with great suspicion.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
+1rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:33 pmIf food is scum this game is over. I would never push his kill, he is the one doing most effort and it doesn't look like scum effort.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
So did Icelaph wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 10:41 pmI agree with rdr on this point and I think he looks good for trying to narrow a pool that he's also in.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:29 pmJamie is likely town for the way he handled HB try, plus he has less chance to be scum, so he shouldn't be in this pool.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 2:29 pmScum have no day chat so multiple (3+) bussing seems highly unlikely.
Therefore we can assume AT LEAST 2 scum in
Jamie Macca Yav rdr
Voting outside this pool tomorrow would be suboptimal (44% v >= 50%).
People advocating voting outside this group should be viewed with great suspicion.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Why would they do that?dargorygel wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 9:11 pmDear scum room.
If you a) tell me who you want me to scan and b) do not roll lock me I will follow your advice.
So everyone tell me who to investigate.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Naw
-
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
- Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
But you were so coy, that scum probably missed it.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 4:09 pmI was trying to be coy about it >:(Macca573 wrote: ↑Sun May 02, 2021 12:50 pm
I think it certainly is a case, and one perhaps worthy of causing change in thought.
I started with a scumread on bona. This switched to town to to his ongoing handling of the darg claim. It took guts to go against the town like that, and I liked that someone had agreed with me.
To find out now that is was to "protect darg", is a bit of a let down.
I agree with your sentiment that it did not seem like he was softing cop. That came to appear when people kept asking him if he was secretly the cop, giving reason to his suspicion, but he flat out denies these claims.
From my perspective, this "I was trying to softclaim" comes of as weak and seeming to be trying to cover his back. All in all, I think less of him after than before.
TL;DR I would be willing to vote for Bona tomorrow.
Being blatant means scum wouldn't have believed me.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brainbomb, han-shahanshah