After inventor flipped we had a confirmed ninja anyways. I like the quote of his that kgray posted earlier about Darg's house being empty suggesting that he went there and saw nothing.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:25 amAgree. Even if he saw nothing. Because if he watches Vecna, sees nobody visit, but Vecna dies, then he 100% knows it was the Ninja.
MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:56 pmCan someone make a list of the people who've stated that they were aware of brain's crumbs?kgray wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 3:34 pmI *hope* he's underwhelming town, after I fought for him so much yesterday. But I'm not sure, because it feels a bit like he was happy to sit back and let that happen, which worries me.
I'm not passionate about any scumreads anymore...
I think Bona's unjustified defense of worcej is extremely scummy, but he kept his cool at EOD and didn't vote worcej to save himself. I've townread scum for doing similar things before, but with 2 minutes left it's pretty compelling. If he'd answer my question about worcej's D1 VCA then I'd probably check him off my list forever.... But it's still bugging me lol
Yav is skeezing me out a little. His irrelevant vote for Maniac yesterday and then chastising of Chaqa feels like someone who didn't want to get their hands dirty on a town wagon, and he was a Hamilton voter D1. The way he's scumreading Rivera for his Hamilton vote has been bothering me, because as much as Yav explains himself, I'm not seeing the difference between Rivera making Hamilton a viable wagon when Demon was leading and yav not leaving Hamilton for Demon.
Jamie's obsession with Maniac reminds me of when he was "tunneling" on his scumbuddy ghug a few games ago. I don't know if it makes sense for him and Maniac to be partners, but it's kind of the only read Jamie has given and it feels like he's hiding behind it. His ranting about darg and this recent push for Macca I think are standard Jamie things and are NAI, but overall he feels more reserved than he normally does as town. Also, regarding the janitor thing: I don't think it makes sense for scum to Janitor brain, because his Watcher soft was so obvious. I know that if brain was Janitor'd and then someone claimed Watcher, I'd be really suspicious of that claim. So while Rivera obviously *could* be the Janitor, I think it's more likely that scum tried to Janitor Vecna and got blocked, so I think Jamie or Damo is more likely.
I'm probably the most suspicious of Flum, though. I get what he was saying about Rivera just watching at EOD yesterday (and I didn't like how Rivera called me out for being on a "non-momentum" wagon instead of saving him, when he wasn't even voting to save himself), but I really didn't like Flum's refusal to vote for a relevant wagon. He was just actively not participating. And then his last-minute post complaining about not being able to break a tie was just... ick. Also, both Flum and Chaqa have been playing Mafia for a lot longer than me and I know how the Watcher works, so I think Flum's scumread of Chaqa for understanding that mechanic is fake. I also didn't like his lazy claim that I was near-obvtown for my D1 Demon vote. And celaph was also a huge part of that vote, and Flum ignoring that to sheep brain's read just seems like opportunistic piggy-backing off of town.
So yeah, ##vote flum.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Game days.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:05 pmIt's been a week ...ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:46 pmMacca did tell us when they signed up that they'd have low availability the first few days.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:33 am
STOP MAKING EXCUSES
You have done nothing all game but make excuses.
Participate properly today or be killed.
I'm fine with pressuring them to contribute, but it's a little disingenuous to act like it was unexpected, and the vote count has me bored.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I agree with your first line that it doesn't look line any of those 3 were saved though I think such a conclusion is meaningless with regard to you or I as neither of us were major wagons at the time. It's a decent look for rdr though.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:48 amI was pointing out the flashwagon didn't seem to be a save (of those mentioned).
I didn't mention Maniac precisely because he was voting worcej.
Tbh I can't remember why I excluded Bona and included you. Probably I was just more conscious of you having been a lead wagon for a lot of the day.
I'm bothered that you seem to be skirting around the issue of Maniac here. If you're concluding that 3 people who didn't vote worcej aren't being saved, why aren't you similarly concluding that it looks like Maniac was saved? Or, if you aren't concluding that about him, why is that?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
to be fair, that was meant to go only for macca for a fast response.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:01 pmBack from the jab!
Anyway, first two seem foregone. Why Macca for Jailor? Yeah, right, that's not a thing this game. Kak and yourself doing the best to confuse me.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I honestly wasn't sure what his intention was with including those names. Hence why I asked. Having since seen his response, I'm worried that he was taking attention away from Maniac.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:02 pmWhat's your conclusion why Damo included those names that weren't on the Worcej wagon?
Why might I phrase it like that? Focus attention somewhere else, perhaps?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I somehow get the feeling some of your posts are just rehashes of some of my earlier onesHamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:16 pmHow would we know if the Janitor has been ineffectual?Maniac wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 2:07 pm
As the two people claiming RB are Dargorygil and Rdriveria and Dargo was likely blocked by scum, then Rdr becomes prime candidate for ninja if WW did munch BB. Or WW and ninja both killed BB and Rdr was blocked from cleaning up. As we have narrowed down the set-ups a lot based on the kills to date, the janitor has been ineffectual for whatever reason and possible that reason is that they have been blocked.
WHo claimed RB N1? Damo and Jamie. If both are telling the truth, how is one of the two not scum?
N2: Darg and Rivera. Again, same issue, because there's only one roleblocker per side, right?
Perhaps werewolf needs to bite one of those four?
Assuming Darg is cop, blocked by scum, Rivera by default would be scum, yes?
Is this off-base, and if so, how?
maybe with just a little extra ...
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
what is this question for the question, is that a direct question back?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:35 pmWhat are you thinking about the Yav and Rivera interactions?
Regarding Flum's deep dive, I'll have to go back to check what they concluded, but I think it's a decent exercise for any town to be doing. Did you do one, and what did you come up with?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
fair pointHamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:37 pmI might call bull on that. I know it's easy to lose track but I think reasons are fairly clear. I know if I answered with "I don't remember," I'd be laughed out of here. Or at least grilled unendingly.
I kinda missed bona's reply here, it was directly below foods question, must've scrolled too fast at one point. Thanks for catching that hamilton
many townpoints with the reasoning 'I don't remember', I got to remember this for next time. If you are town bona, I'll link it every time
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Isn't that how the werewolf wants to be seen as?ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 8:24 pmThe VT hardclaim seems like someone who wasn't thinking about the werewolf at all to me.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
*\o/*Hellenic Riot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 8:55 pmDay Three Vote Count 1.0:
[...]
Currently MACCA573 is set to be daykilled.
*|o|*
*\o/*
*|o|*
*\o/*
[/quote]You have 24 hours and 4 minutes remaining. [/quote]
to reach page 199
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I agree with your first line, though I would rather just get a sub if they don't participate. That said, they've said they've caught up so I'm hoping that they contribute later today. That said, what do you mean they didn't show up after a wagon formed against them? The way that you are soft defending them without paying attention feels icky.yavuzovic wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:12 pmI don't approve Macca kill, they won't be much informative and we have better candidates. Also they doesn't show up after a wagon is formed against them so they are more likely to be town I guess. I don't want to townread Macca because I have no reason, but should we really kill a lurker?
Macca573 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:29 ammmkay... I read the bot votes, and I've seen this. What exactly do you want from me? To compromise my principles?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:34 am##VOTE MACCA
I think we've had quite enough of this anchoring and delaying from Macca.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
What do you think of hamilton then? also mafia? D1 he did the same thing as rd so it was 4-3-3-3 (demon - myself - hamilton - brain), in fact, by your logic, rd voted mafia (since only mafia gives more alternatives, right?)yavuzovic wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:18 pmI don't scumread you because your vote D1 is bizarre, in fact, we were on the same wagon. I scumread you because you voted for HB when RHK/HB were 4/2 nd with your vote this became 4/3. Ypu created wn alternative for RHK, who is confirmed scum.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:41 amYou scumreading me because my vote D1 is bizarre. You also scumread Worcej?
I feel good with my vote, will probably only change if Damo become a viable wagon.
If my reason was only who you voted for, I would scumread myself as well :/
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
The whole point of the flippant "Quite amusing" post was that there were 5 people on it EXCLUDING people who were leading wagons at some stage (admittedly omitting Bona). Maniac was voting worcej so naturally I didn't mention him in the post. You asked why Maniac wasn't mentioned in the post and I've answered.celaph wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:16 pmI agree with your first line that it doesn't look line any of those 3 were saved though I think such a conclusion is meaningless with regard to you or I as neither of us were major wagons at the time. It's a decent look for rdr though.damo666 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:48 amI was pointing out the flashwagon didn't seem to be a save (of those mentioned).
I didn't mention Maniac precisely because he was voting worcej.
Tbh I can't remember why I excluded Bona and included you. Probably I was just more conscious of you having been a lead wagon for a lot of the day.
I'm bothered that you seem to be skirting around the issue of Maniac here. If you're concluding that 3 people who didn't vote worcej aren't being saved, why aren't you similarly concluding that it looks like Maniac was saved? Or, if you aren't concluding that about him, why is that?
Whether Maniac is scum and was saved is a different issue. I'm leaning 55/45 scum.
It was a post simply pointing out there was a sudden wagon with most of the voters thereon not being major wagons themselves. Nothing more nothing less.
Both you and Bona have taken this further than warranted.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Sure. It comes down to whether you read it as authentic or not. Maniac is someone who's adept at hiding his true intentions, but I think his goal in making that post was to convince us that he's town because mafia on the block there would leave a fakeclaim on the table. The VT hardclaim read more like a legitimate mistake in the heat of that, not a conscious attempt to make himself look less wolfy.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
maybe you're correct. maybe you're not as fully correct, who knows for sure.
I'm just amused that the two non-votes are the two leading wagons.
I'm just amused that the two non-votes are the two leading wagons.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
oh, I see Macca online
did you finally catch up? If so, make your vote count.
did you finally catch up? If so, make your vote count.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Oh Macca is here?
However, I've just come back from the pub and I am falling asleep on the keyboard. I'll care about Macca tomorrow.
##END
(also, fuck you Macca)
However, I've just come back from the pub and I am falling asleep on the keyboard. I'll care about Macca tomorrow.
##END
(also, fuck you Macca)
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
@HB, can you comment on your read of me?
Your vote and the shade you threw at my Damo question suggest that you scum read me. Your justification seems to be an assumption that BB had some mechanical info on me and I'm concerned that you're hiding behind that.
Your vote and the shade you threw at my Damo question suggest that you scum read me. Your justification seems to be an assumption that BB had some mechanical info on me and I'm concerned that you're hiding behind that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Ernst_Brenner