MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Hellenic Riot
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Day Three Vote Count 1.0:
Macca573 (4): Kakarroto, Jamiet99uk, Chaqa, damo666
kgray (2): Bonatogether, foodcoats
celaph (2): Maniac, Hamilton Brian
yavuzovic (1): rdrivera2005
Chaqa (1): Fluminator
rdrivera2005 (1): yavuzovic
Bonatogether (1): ghug
Fluminator (1): kgray
Not voted (3): celaph, dargorygel, Macca573
Currently MACCA573 is set to be daykilled.
You have 24 hours and 4 minutes remaining.
Macca573 (4): Kakarroto, Jamiet99uk, Chaqa, damo666
kgray (2): Bonatogether, foodcoats
celaph (2): Maniac, Hamilton Brian
yavuzovic (1): rdrivera2005
Chaqa (1): Fluminator
rdrivera2005 (1): yavuzovic
Bonatogether (1): ghug
Fluminator (1): kgray
Not voted (3): celaph, dargorygel, Macca573
Currently MACCA573 is set to be daykilled.
You have 24 hours and 4 minutes remaining.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Hi
Anchor vote.
I know... I hate 'em too.
There was some good mechanical observations about which setup we might have, and the RB options.
I am thinking that vecna might not have been roleblocked. But then someone has something. (Says captain obvious.)
Maniac seems arguing just to argue. I could vote for him.
Macca is absent, which I get. But they claimed to be reading all day and had nothing to say. Sort of too scummy to be scummy. I could vote for them.
HB looks better to me than previously. My sense after one read is that Ham has started interacting more than just blurting.
Those were my three killables last time i wrote such things.
But my anchor vote today is on fluminator. Watching and not liking the interaction with kgray.
##VOTE FLUMINATOR
Anchor vote.
I know... I hate 'em too.
There was some good mechanical observations about which setup we might have, and the RB options.
I am thinking that vecna might not have been roleblocked. But then someone has something. (Says captain obvious.)
Maniac seems arguing just to argue. I could vote for him.
Macca is absent, which I get. But they claimed to be reading all day and had nothing to say. Sort of too scummy to be scummy. I could vote for them.
HB looks better to me than previously. My sense after one read is that Ham has started interacting more than just blurting.
Those were my three killables last time i wrote such things.
But my anchor vote today is on fluminator. Watching and not liking the interaction with kgray.
##VOTE FLUMINATOR
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Bb cannot reach to a conclusion by observing two visits. He did the observation only for one night and even if he observed 2 visits, he wouldn't be able to say who is who.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Haha just saw this.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 6:10 pmI'll give you towncred if you bus her![]()
Very slow reading day
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don't approve Macca kill, they won't be much informative and we have better candidates. Also he doesn't show up after a wagon is formed against them so they are more likely to be town I guess. I don't want to townread Macca because I have no reason, but should we really kill a lurker?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
That is another good reason.foodcoats wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:38 amI think I saw later that you explained this as “town would not think about how WW can help scum.” I don’t agree, but I do think this fits into a pattern of HB making posts that do not advance the game for town but rather are a fakenews attempt to make it LOOK like he is solving.
I think my vote will be among these three today: Rivera, Maniac and Hamilton.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Then why to expose himself if he couldn't catch a suspect. Even if this happened, he would keep the information for himself. If he observed someone other than ninja, it would make sense to crumb but pretty much everyone can guess that mafia would send the ninja as lomg as they are available.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:25 amAgree. Even if he saw nothing. Because if he watches Vecna, sees nobody visit, but Vecna dies, then he 100% knows it was the Ninja.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Thank you ghiggity, this post was not at all useless.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don't scumread you because your vote D1 is bizarre, in fact, we were on the same wagon. I scumread you because you voted for HB when RHK/HB were 4/2 nd with your vote this became 4/3. Ypu created wn alternative for RHK, who is confirmed scum.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:41 amYou scumreading me because my vote D1 is bizarre. You also scumread Worcej?
I feel good with my vote, will probably only change if Damo become a viable wagon.
If my reason was only who you voted for, I would scumread myself as well :/
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
....Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 6:56 pmNot to answer for Kgray but, I mean, the highlighted text is your answer there.foodcoats wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 6:53 pmCouldn’t both damo and Jamie be town, Vecna unblocked?kgray wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:20 pm
Okay, I'll reread you later today too. But I do think you're holding back a lot more than normal, and the Maniac focus is most of what I remember off the top of my head, which is why it feels like you're hiding behind it.
If they knew Vecna would die (maybe there's no doctor), then they wouldn't necessarily need to RB him, right? It just worked out that his PR was the one that could still do something N1 if he died. But even if Vecna was RB'd, then either you or damo has to be scum, and I'm not sure why you couldn't be Janitor who was RB'd by town? Am I missing a mechanic?
I think if scum was RB'd by town, they'd have to claim. It would be really suspicious not to.
Reaction test
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I think yavu comes out looking better and rdr looks a little shady.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:35 pmWhat are you thinking about the Yav and Rivera interactions?
Regarding Flum's deep dive, I'll have to go back to check what they concluded, but I think it's a decent exercise for any town to be doing. Did you do one, and what did you come up with?
I can’t decide if Flum was making scum noise or legitimately investigating.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Brain very obviously hinted we were not in the setup that has no Watcher.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:44 pmI want to hold on to this for the time being since you're admitting the suspicions you have about either Jamie, Damo, or both.kgray wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 3:34 pmAlso, regarding the janitor thing: I don't think it makes sense for scum to Janitor brain, because his Watcher soft was so obvious. I know that if brain was Janitor'd and then someone claimed Watcher, I'd be really suspicious of that claim. So while Rivera obviously *could* be the Janitor, I think it's more likely that scum tried to Janitor Vecna and got blocked, so I think Jamie or Damo is more likely.
Was brain's Watcher soft obvious? Was there a particular writing that made it obvious?
I get what you're saying...that since the softclaim was obvious, someone else stepping in to claim it would be sus.
However, is this not a line of thinking based on the facts we now have? It's possible that there wasn't a soft claim.
How is it that scum would feel safe declaring them being roleblocked?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Well celaph still looks scummy, literally has not posted a read today, and possibly either kgray or bona or both has set up to roll him under the express route as they argue over his scumminess when previously both of them were giving him passing grades, even though he was just as slipper since D1.
##VOTE celaph
##VOTE celaph
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I'll reread but that shit isn't jumping out at me. Makes me feel like we could save some time if the ww claimed. What do you think about that?Chaqa wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 8:18 pmI just did.
It’s mostly based off him seeming different from normal and his VT hard claim/retraction. He also seems pretty indifferent to the DKs.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Alright, enough Canadian politeness. You saying you don't remember is BS. I think it's equivocating. I think you play better than that so I'm going to file you in scum realm. That's a couple of things now that you've not copped to; the original being kgray's question.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 8:31 pmEither do it or don't, no wishy washy "oh I might call you on this"Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:37 pmI might call bull on that. I know it's easy to lose track but I think reasons are fairly clear. I know if I answered with "I don't remember," I'd be laughed out of here. Or at least grilled unendingly.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Why would the WW claim???Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:34 pmI'll reread but that shit isn't jumping out at me. Makes me feel like we could save some time if the ww claimed. What do you think about that?
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
kgray acknowledged that I answered her question.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:38 pmAlright, enough Canadian politeness. You saying you don't remember is BS. I think it's equivocating. I think you play better than that so I'm going to file you in scum realm. That's a couple of things now that you've not copped to; the original being kgray's question.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 8:31 pmEither do it or don't, no wishy washy "oh I might call you on this"Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:37 pm
I might call bull on that. I know it's easy to lose track but I think reasons are fairly clear. I know if I answered with "I don't remember," I'd be laughed out of here. Or at least grilled unendingly.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
In what way were my comments about Celaph "towny" whereas Kgray's comments were scummy?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:23 pmYour defenses were townierJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:02 pmAlso, I defended Celaph a fair bit on D2, yet Bona has never mentioned this.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
interactions: I'm not sure yav read the whole game. The part where he said he it's mostly for rd's D1 vote baffles me too, it was 4-3-2-2 with demon, myself, hamilton and brain, then his vote made it a 4-3-3-2 and hamilton voted brain for a 4-3-3-3. I don't see how that would make him mafia, maybe he meant the reasoning for that, I'd have to look back for that. But then again, he didn't say anything about that so I suppose no. I mean, do you see that as vote-worthy?
deep dive: I felt kinda weirded out on the speed flum got the quote and then the discussion started about watcher, I felt like 'come on everyone, why are you so obsessed with PR's, we would be still be able to do it if we were all normal vt's' or what who crumbed. It all felt so unnecessary to me. Maybe I'm wrong and dull, since I didn't saw what brain was and everyone saying 'oh so clear', but then again, I haven't searched for him for any special role since I was convinced he's town. Well at least I got that right. blind chicken and things.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
It's been a week ...ghug wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:46 pmMacca did tell us when they signed up that they'd have low availability the first few days.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:33 amSTOP MAKING EXCUSES
You have done nothing all game but make excuses.
Participate properly today or be killed.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, gimix, han-shahanshah, Hominidae, Spartaculous