MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.
succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.
I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.
Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.
Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.
I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.
Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.
Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Apologies to bona... Food, that's for you.kgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:59 pmyeah that was food though, not Bona.dargorygel wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:58 pm@bona
Please refrain from this kind of comment:
The only other explanation is if you are autistic in some way, and I say that with no mean spiritedness or crudeness intended. I will adjust to your statements appropriately if you are on the spectrum.
Thanks
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
We're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pmA more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thingkgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:52 pmThat was the only thing you listed as justification for your townread. What are your other reasons?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:48 pm
But I don't have just he one reason for townreading him.
Decent VCA from d1
Vecna townread him
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Maybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pmI dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.
succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.
I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.
Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.
Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
viewtopic.php?p=233944#p233944kgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pmWe're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pmA more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thing
Decent VCA from d1
Vecna townread him
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Oh, thanks. Interesting that you townread him for this though. It looks to me more like he's encouraging brain scumreading you without committing to it. Also.... compare this to his reason for voting Hamilton. I don't get how that was more compelling to him than this. And can you explain why you think his Hamilton vote was towny?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:13 pmviewtopic.php?p=233944#p233944kgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:07 pmWe're talking about worcej, right? I don't see a response to Macca's opening post. What is decent about him throwing down a vote for Hamilton (agreeing with me for something that I never even said was scummy) and leaving it there?Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:02 pm
A more reasonable response to the whole 'macca's opening post' thing
Decent VCA from d1
Vecna townread him
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
he didnt say you were poignant.kgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:11 pmMaybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pmI dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.
succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.
I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.
Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.
Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
he said
She’s succinct, precise, asking the right questions. She needs to start giving herself more credit for her play. gl town and sheep kgray. :)
this is now the second time youve credited celaph with doing things he didnt even actually do.
- Hellenic Riot
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
##GM Note:
This thread, or indeed anywhere else in general, is not an appropriate place to theorise on whether players are autistic. Such personal attacks will not be tolerated.
This thread, or indeed anywhere else in general, is not an appropriate place to theorise on whether players are autistic. Such personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
If he isnt pocketing you hes just scum with you
so thats also an explanation. I was giving you benefit of the doubt but your strange credit to him for things he isnt doing tells me you arent reading his posts and you dont really care
so thats also an explanation. I was giving you benefit of the doubt but your strange credit to him for things he isnt doing tells me you arent reading his posts and you dont really care
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I hope im not interrupting you having a shit fit with another player in the game. I sure love watching people tell each other to fuck off.
riveting
riveting
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
This is so bad is so man ways. Lazy and not accuratte to say the less.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:00 pmTownread worcej, for having the actually solid idea that darg had to have read the setup and all that
Townread macca off of vibes
brain - eager but wrong in townie ways
scumreading food, for being smart in a very weird way and dumb in a very weird way.
scumreading HR for mushing his group with Chaqa's? Kinda weird since the groups themselves were fine. If HR is scum then there are two or three towns in the smaller group he named (worcej, RDR, macca)
soft scumreading rdr for just not seeming as sly in the way he did in previous games
soft scumreading kgray just for seeming off-beat even though I agree with her on a lot of things. VCA also isn't great.
not sure:
I go back and forth on ghug cause he makes some good points but then goes and does something that makes him look really bad to me. If he's not dead in a while I'm calling this scum.
Chaqa seems different from his last game, but I suppose he'd be like that in all circumstances. Leantown, but if he's not dked soon leanscum
I dunno about kak. The gun business was townie but asking "oh why would I do this if I was scum i'm so town" set off a lot of alarm bells for me.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I didn't say celaph said that, *you* said I think my views are poignant. You're implying he's buddying me and that's why I'm asking you.brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:22 pmhe didnt say you were poignant.kgray wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:11 pmMaybe not succinct, but I did think my views are poignant... Are they not? I don't feel like celaph is pocketing me again....brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:06 pmI dont disagree that being succinct is a good way to make ones post more easy to identify with. being understood is important.
succinct is to be short, sweet, and to the point.
I find it incredibly odd that rdrivera and kgray would be the players celaph identifies as succinct.
Firstly rdrivera has done very little and I dont think hes been memorable nor has he been succinct. to be straight to the point youd need to actually have a point.
Secondly kgray has not been succinct at all. shes been a fireball this game in battling people head on. She hasnt been straight and to the point. at times her points have been lost in long meandering wars of words. I feel that saying kgray has been succinct is celaphs way of feeding kgrays ego and getting off her radar. She reads that opinion and thinks celaph must be on her side and that her views are poignant. Kgray likes to be understood and celaph continues to fear kgray turning on him.
he said
She’s succinct, precise, asking the right questions. She needs to start giving herself more credit for her play. gl town and sheep kgray. :)
this is now the second time youve credited celaph with doing things he didnt even actually do.
What was the thing I said he did that he didn't do?
- Hellenic Riot
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Day Two Vote Count 3.0:
celaph (5): ghug, Kakarroto, brainbomb, dargorygel, foodcoats
Maniac (4): yavuzovic, Jamiet99uk, Chaqa, Hamilton Brian
rdrivera2005 (4): Maniac, damo666, Fluminator, Bonatogether
damo666 (3): worcej, celaph, rdrivera2005
worcej (1): kgray
dargorygel (1):Macca573
Currently CELAPH is set to be daykilled.
You have four hours and 33 minutes remaining.
celaph (5): ghug, Kakarroto, brainbomb, dargorygel, foodcoats
Maniac (4): yavuzovic, Jamiet99uk, Chaqa, Hamilton Brian
rdrivera2005 (4): Maniac, damo666, Fluminator, Bonatogether
damo666 (3): worcej, celaph, rdrivera2005
worcej (1): kgray
dargorygel (1):Macca573
Currently CELAPH is set to be daykilled.
You have four hours and 33 minutes remaining.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I rest my case on celaph
and my scumreads now include kgray.
that is all.
scumteam
celaph
kgray
fluminator
jamie/chaqa/rdrivera
and my scumreads now include kgray.
that is all.
scumteam
celaph
kgray
fluminator
jamie/chaqa/rdrivera
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I am completelly sure at least half the scum team is voting me now.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Wish Flum hadn't upped and walked away.
Still want to know why they'd vote damo but would rather give them another day/night for "shenanigans" or whatever it was they said. I'd like to know what possible use allowing more roleblocking BS against town HAVE for town.
And still landing on Rivera, with...any justification?
Anyone else sit in the FLum camp with those ideas?
Still want to know why they'd vote damo but would rather give them another day/night for "shenanigans" or whatever it was they said. I'd like to know what possible use allowing more roleblocking BS against town HAVE for town.
And still landing on Rivera, with...any justification?
Anyone else sit in the FLum camp with those ideas?
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
So you think there's 2+ scum in Maniac/damo/flum/me? Just to be clear?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 4:30 pmI am completelly sure at least half the scum team is voting me now.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
You don't know how to be succinct brain.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I could get behind you being scum.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Hominidae