MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
My read on Chaqa has moved to null. Other reads unchanged (actually no, Maniac's most recent post makes me lean town on him now).celaph wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:18 amDamo obviously thought Chaqa warranted a cautious townlean N1. He then includes Chaqa on a might kill list. My question, is if in the intermediate 50 or so pages, has his justification changed.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 1:12 amI missed that
*looks at page 69 to damo's reads* ... "Chaqa - probtown but does like a bus so townlean with caution."
well, he actually mentioned the bus so I wouldn't think damo would think the way you describe it. Was this a try to throw shade? Do I interpret too much into that? It first looked like celaph trying to solve but the second look make me question that strongly.
My bigger concern with Damo and the driving motivation behind the question is that he hasn't posted any reads outside that one list N1. The only thing has has done is the "I'll vote from these people" list that he posted today. (Side note: his more recent vote is on Maniac who wasn't on the list).
Secondly, the timing on his N1 reads list feels unnatural to me. He posted it 6 hours before EoN which seems odd given that he was active later that night. More interestingly, he also posted it less than an hour after responding to brain's criticism that he hadn't mentioned most of the people in the game and took care to respond to mention everyone (except flum) including people like Jamie and ghug on which he had nothing to say.
And you're right my read list post was at least partially provoked by brain (and my D1 inactivity).
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
It says so on the tin.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I wrote about it in another post.celaph wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 amCan you elaborate on why you think I was bussing, in particular why you think I didn't intend to and got stuck?foodcoats wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:30 amThis is interesting from Maniac. He has a decent point about one busser only. Also the way Maniac is acting, in particular seeming kind of excited and specifically entering saying he “had a reason to waste time” playing this game and is now kind of walking away and not fighting for his spot and says he DOESN’T have time, makes me think he is the WW. It seems like a particularly hard 3P that is actually just designed to prevent massclaim and I totally could see someone being frustrated by drawing it.Maniac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:06 pmThis may be a stupid question but do Mafia have a roleblock?
Also for those looking for a D1 busser, sure a busser could exist. The vote count at the end was DemonRHK 7, Kak 4, HB 3, so unless Kak and HB are scum then DemonRHK gets saved if there are two scum on his wagon.
So assuming 0 or 1 busser we have scum on demonRHK could be 1/6
And non-bussers mafia are 3 from the remaining twelve players. Much more chance of finding scum here even if we throw a dart.
We can find any bussers later.
I'm aware that you'll all think I'm saying this to save myself, but you should all know it makes sense. Ask yourselves what you'll do if I flip town? Will you keep going through DemonRHK voters?
In my analysis then celaph was the busser, although he probably didn’t intend to and got stuck. damo is weirdly lurky, and in general I’m finding the conversation for the last few hours feels like town arguing with itself, so I’d say mafia is predominantly in lurk mode, possibly lacking confidence. damo is one other scum. HB would be a third, he’s said weird wishy washy nothingness. Not sure on the last.
Can you tell me, do you think that the Demon wagon was all town? Or do you scumread anyone on there?
Vote and show me your cards. You only made one vote yesterday. Will it be the same today? Your vote is a tool, you know...
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Not panic.foodcoats wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:21 amI like celaph’s participation, he will at least be fun to play with. Damo usually has stronger play, seems to be making silly posts that don’t display any depth, rando unexplained rdr vote, and I believe he may be the Janitor and was blocked. Not just from Maniac’s argument but another clue on the text but don’t want to accidentally out anything yet.
Also interested to see what damo does if pressured.
##VOTE damo666
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I meant to add that my today kill list is rdr yav Flumdamo666 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:36 amMy read on Chaqa has moved to null. Other reads unchanged (actually no, Maniac's most recent post makes me lean town on him now).celaph wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:18 amDamo obviously thought Chaqa warranted a cautious townlean N1. He then includes Chaqa on a might kill list. My question, is if in the intermediate 50 or so pages, has his justification changed.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 1:12 am
I missed that
*looks at page 69 to damo's reads* ... "Chaqa - probtown but does like a bus so townlean with caution."
well, he actually mentioned the bus so I wouldn't think damo would think the way you describe it. Was this a try to throw shade? Do I interpret too much into that? It first looked like celaph trying to solve but the second look make me question that strongly.
My bigger concern with Damo and the driving motivation behind the question is that he hasn't posted any reads outside that one list N1. The only thing has has done is the "I'll vote from these people" list that he posted today. (Side note: his more recent vote is on Maniac who wasn't on the list).
Secondly, the timing on his N1 reads list feels unnatural to me. He posted it 6 hours before EoN which seems odd given that he was active later that night. More interestingly, he also posted it less than an hour after responding to brain's criticism that he hadn't mentioned most of the people in the game and took care to respond to mention everyone (except flum) including people like Jamie and ghug on which he had nothing to say.
And you're right my read list post was at least partially provoked by brain (and my D1 inactivity).
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I suppose I should respond to this since you have at last managed to put some effort into posting.Maniac wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:33 amFirstly Jamie’s claim to have been roleblocked is interesting. The possibilities are:
(1) He is telling the truth and scum think he is a PR
(2) He is telling the truth and we have a Roleblocker who thinks Jamie is scum
(3) He is lying (and therefore likely scum).
Taking these in order on night one how usual is it for scum to RB the person they kill? They have clearly killed Vecna for a reason (assuming it’s not a freak werewolf kill) and that is likely to be that they suspect he was a PR. If they suspected him of being the inventor then they would almost certainly have RB him to ensure nothing useful fell into town hands. Unless one of vecna’s inventions gets claimed and used, I’m leaning towards option (1) being unlikely.
Jamie could’ve been blocked by the town roleblocker which would tell us two things (a) we have a town roleblocker and (b) scum have a janitor which raises the question why wasn’t vecna janitored? Maybe Jamie is the janitor but got roleblocked, maybe scum wanted to keep janitor hidden? I think keeping janitor hidden is unlikely, scum benefit massively from cleaning up the first nightkill. So this leaves us with the possibility that Jamie is telling the truth about being roleblocked and that increases the likelihood that he is the janitor.
If Jamie wasn’t roleblocked then he is lying scum. I doubt any town player lies about a roleblock when there is a high probability that we have a town roleblocker in play.
Tl:Dr on that bit – I think Jamie could be the janitor.
Your narrative about how I could be the Janitor is logically consistent from a town perspective, apart from the way it ignores the fact there are *two* roleblock claims. It's also wrong, since I am town, but if you are town it would be a valid enough theory to postulate.
Apart from Damo's claim there is also a scenario you have not considered in your list here:
(4) Jamie is telling the truth and scum roleblocked him to cause noise and distraction in the thread by having people doubt his roleblock claim.
I say this because as scum, in a previous game, I was part of a scum team that decided to roleblock Brainbomb, not because we thought he was PR (we didn't) but simply because it would cause Brainbomb to yell "I WAS ROLEBLOCKED" and the ensuing drama this would create in the thread would be helpful to scum in keeping hidden. So this is literally a tactic that I can verify scum have used before.
Now if you are going to keep participating I demand that you address this lying post right here:
Your D1 vote on me was before I had posted for the first time so you could not possibly have had legitimate "suspicions" about me at the time you cast it. Therefore saying "I’ve had suspicions about Jamie from the start" is a bad lie and I'm not letting you get away with it.
Please address this.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Here's a general point that is often overlooked:
Scum do want to kill PRs, of course.
Scum also want to kill players they think are good.
Sometimes however, some people's analysis is constructed as if that is all Scum are ever trying to achieve at night.
Scum want to hide. Scum want to misdirect town. Scum want to mislead town with red herrings. Scum want town to be confused.
Do not forget that the creation of noise, distraction, and general confusion are valid motivations for scum decision making.
Scum do want to kill PRs, of course.
Scum also want to kill players they think are good.
Sometimes however, some people's analysis is constructed as if that is all Scum are ever trying to achieve at night.
Scum want to hide. Scum want to misdirect town. Scum want to mislead town with red herrings. Scum want town to be confused.
Do not forget that the creation of noise, distraction, and general confusion are valid motivations for scum decision making.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Here are all of the votes cast for Celaph in the last 24 hours, with their accompanying comments:
Who thinks these look like good, solid, strong reasons for voting?
dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:18 pmI could go for celaph or bona. But I'll be satisfied with celaph. Too many empty posts, and he's better than that.
##vote celaph
Bonatogether wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:19 pmI haven't been able to follow the game very closely today, but from just looking at the wagons, ##vote celaph to make him squirm a bit.
Kakarroto wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:09 amhmm ... not that I especially dislike the people on maniac, the people on celaph are quite more sexier overall, and celaph didn't answer my question on post #2530 on page 127 yet, and bona wanted competetive wagons, so let's see where that brings us
##vote celaph
Apparently the momentum on Celaph is because we want competitive wagons with Kak thinks that Ghug and Darg are sexy.
Who thinks these look like good, solid, strong reasons for voting?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
- Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Ok, I'm on page 75 and I will not make it up before EOD. So for now, I will leave a vote on ##VOTE dargorygel . Basically, I don't like what he did with the whole claim thing, a thought that will be better expressed when my posts come out.
Goodnight, and I'll see you tomorrow!
Goodnight, and I'll see you tomorrow!
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I realize that your massive erection longs to see maniac behead and shackled to a mechanical bull
at present I am iffy on maniac being scum and think maybe hes just very lazy
whereas I think celaph told me in at least 3 ways he is scum
at present I am iffy on maniac being scum and think maybe hes just very lazy
whereas I think celaph told me in at least 3 ways he is scum
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
so yea thats the copMacca573 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:59 amOk, I'm on page 75 and I will not make it up before EOD. So for now, I will leave a vote on ##VOTE dargorygel . Basically, I don't like what he did with the whole claim thing, a thought that will be better expressed when my posts come out.
Goodnight, and I'll see you tomorrow!
youre gonna leave your vote on the cop
-
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
- Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Where I'm up to, he's no longer the cop. And even if he reclaimed, I wouldn't believe him (barring exceptional circumstances).brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:00 pmso yea thats the copMacca573 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:59 amOk, I'm on page 75 and I will not make it up before EOD. So for now, I will leave a vote on ##VOTE dargorygel . Basically, I don't like what he did with the whole claim thing, a thought that will be better expressed when my posts come out.
Goodnight, and I'll see you tomorrow!
youre gonna leave your vote on the cop
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
maniac saying he has sussed jamie since before jamie had ever posted seems like a really lazy or very misunderstood point.
1 like did maniac rvs vote jamie
2 get concerned jamie maybe actually was scum
3 decide that hes been sus of jamie all along from point 2 on or from point 1 on
I feel like the laziness is pretty bad there
1 like did maniac rvs vote jamie
2 get concerned jamie maybe actually was scum
3 decide that hes been sus of jamie all along from point 2 on or from point 1 on
I feel like the laziness is pretty bad there
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
hes copMacca573 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:03 pmWhere I'm up to, he's no longer the cop. And even if he reclaimed, I wouldn't believe him (barring exceptional circumstances).brainbomb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:00 pmso yea thats the copMacca573 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:59 amOk, I'm on page 75 and I will not make it up before EOD. So for now, I will leave a vote on ##VOTE dargorygel . Basically, I don't like what he did with the whole claim thing, a thought that will be better expressed when my posts come out.
Goodnight, and I'll see you tomorrow!
youre gonna leave your vote on the cop
he inno scanned ghug
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Maniac has been in games with Jamie and myself since M15. hes been in games with ghug and chaqa even longer.
If Maniac does flip scum it tells you a lot about the malaise of the scumteam. dare I say, playing largely a defeated low energy game
If Maniac does flip scum it tells you a lot about the malaise of the scumteam. dare I say, playing largely a defeated low energy game
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I was reading the inventors items and the healing crystal is the best item. it is a three shot doc save that expires when someone is saved. I think vecna wouldve given out a crystal or binoculars rather than trust some person to use a gun early game
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Surely scumManiac would have claimed missingPR rather than VT?
Only discussing Jamie wrt to RB claim and not me is odd. Possible explanations are:
i) Maniac is scum and was therefore conscious of Jamie being RBd
ii) Maniac is town but only noticed Jamie's claim and not mine (possible as he seems obsessed with J for some reason).
Perhaps Town RBer should say who they role blocked. If they roleblocked Jamie that gets rid of option i) above
Only discussing Jamie wrt to RB claim and not me is odd. Possible explanations are:
i) Maniac is scum and was therefore conscious of Jamie being RBd
ii) Maniac is town but only noticed Jamie's claim and not mine (possible as he seems obsessed with J for some reason).
Perhaps Town RBer should say who they role blocked. If they roleblocked Jamie that gets rid of option i) above
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I doubt he'd give out bins that early. Crystal is very very possible.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Hominidae, Spartaculous