MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2261 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:26 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:23 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:22 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:02 pm
Do me a favor - work 95 hours a week for two weeks straight with no days off and in the middle of it have to rotate to graveyards and tell me how much effort you would put into a fucking forum game.

I am fucking over your ‘all you did was start drama’ because I asked you why you are being overly deflective on a certain topic. Your damn right your emotions are in the way.

Also - if you think I would be scum and hide behind RL shit to ‘survive’ longer, then please just simplify it be saying ‘worcej is bad’ and lets move on.
worcej is bad
Yeah but it's he scum?
By participating in the context that I originally outlined, kgray does think scum me would use RL as a shield to live longer.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2262 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:27 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:12 pm
A thought for anyone scumreading kakarot:

With the Inventor flip, why in god's name would scum!Kak even reveal he had a gun? He would just pop someone ASAP and we'd have no clue who did it.
It's not guaranteed that nobody would know about him getting a gun.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2263 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:13 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:11 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:06 pm
I'm at least 69% sure everyone that's super involved in this discussion is town and mafia are just sitting back twiddling their thumbs.
Macca, Maniac and Jamiet. Hmmmmmm.
I am concerned the reads on Jamie are solely based on his lack of posting compared to meta.

I don’t have any strong vibes on him, but I am actively trying not to compare to meta and this comes up.
Why are you trying not to compare to meta?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2264 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:29 pm

Damo seems off with his involvement today. I’d have expected more involvement around the gun, but I see more effort directed at darg.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2265 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:29 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:13 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:11 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:11 pm


Macca, Maniac and Jamiet. Hmmmmmm.
To improve on HB’s post from yesterday, one of these is guaranteed evil.
I'm hesitant to pop Jamie because the town RB'er could tell us if he roleblocked damo or Jamie. If he roleblocked damo, we know Jamie is town.
Mafia could have held the RB and one of them could be fake claiming. Brain already suggested this.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2266 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:15 pm


I felt like you were implying it, and if I put words in your mouth, then I'll retract.

Are there any reads you can expand on?
I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.

Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.

Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.

I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.

I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.

On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2267 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:31 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:21 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:13 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:11 pm


To improve on HB’s post from yesterday, one of these is guaranteed evil.
I'm hesitant to pop Jamie because the town RB'er could tell us if he roleblocked damo or Jamie. If he roleblocked damo, we know Jamie is town.
No, he could be lying about being rbed.
omg stop

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2268 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:32 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:26 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:23 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:22 pm


worcej is bad
Yeah but it's he scum?
By participating in the context that I originally outlined, kgray does think scum me would use RL as a shield to live longer.
I believe you're swamped in IRL, but I don't think that has anything to do with your alignment.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2269 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm


I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.

Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.

Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.

I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.

I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.

On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.
Hey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.

Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2270 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:13 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:11 pm


Macca, Maniac and Jamiet. Hmmmmmm.
I am concerned the reads on Jamie are solely based on his lack of posting compared to meta.

I don’t have any strong vibes on him, but I am actively trying not to compare to meta and this comes up.
Why are you trying not to compare to meta?
Because the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.

Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2271 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:35 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:32 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:26 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:23 pm


Yeah but it's he scum?
By participating in the context that I originally outlined, kgray does think scum me would use RL as a shield to live longer.
I believe you're swamped in IRL, but I don't think that has anything to do with your alignment.
And we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2272 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:15 pm


I felt like you were implying it, and if I put words in your mouth, then I'll retract.

Are there any reads you can expand on?
I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.

Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.

Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.

I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.

I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.

On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Maybe floating isn´t the right term. It´s not fake either. It´s like he want to look like he is making an effort. Today he looks a lot more organic, maybe because we interacted a lot more.

If Dargo is the cop, end hammering him will attract a lot of attention and not the good type (it has already atracted).

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2273 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:13 pm
I am concerned the reads on Jamie are solely based on his lack of posting compared to meta.

I don’t have any strong vibes on him, but I am actively trying not to compare to meta and this comes up.
Why are you trying not to compare to meta?
Because the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.

Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
Who do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?

I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.

User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 10409
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2274 Post by Bonatogether » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:39 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:40 pm
who feels like bona has done alot of solving today
or at all

can you recall a post by bona that helped you understand someone else
I just got out of school. I'm not going to make a big post during chemistry.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2275 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pm


Why are you trying not to compare to meta?
Because the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.

Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
Who do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?

I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
Why are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?

What is defined as an original thought versus not?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2276 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:35 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:32 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:26 pm
By participating in the context that I originally outlined, kgray does think scum me would use RL as a shield to live longer.
I believe you're swamped in IRL, but I don't think that has anything to do with your alignment.
And we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.
That's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.

If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2277 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:42 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm


I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.
Hey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.

Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.
Ghug is tryng to get your job.

I think Jamiet could do it but not do it this game. I can see him doing it if he was all around the thread as a power wolf, but not in this game were his presence isn´t memorable at all.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2278 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:42 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm


I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.

Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.

Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.

I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.

I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.

On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Maybe floating isn´t the right term. It´s not fake either. It´s like he want to look like he is making an effort. Today he looks a lot more organic, maybe because we interacted a lot more.

If Dargo is the cop, end hammering him will attract a lot of attention and not the good type (it has already atracted).
Thoughts on damo endhammering then?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2279 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:35 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:32 pm


I believe you're swamped in IRL, but I don't think that has anything to do with your alignment.
And we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.
That's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.

If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.
Catch up. I have already asked you this.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2280 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
Because the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.

Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
Who do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?

I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
Why are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?

What is defined as an original thought versus not?
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about with me trying to mischaracterize what you're saying.

And I can't believe you're asking me to define the word "original" when my point was clearly that people who are normally very present and active but are not contributing (in *content* not just in number of posts) is suspicious.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot]