Which idea? voting worcej?
MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I think the werewolf has to be aware of the setup as much as scum. attacking you runs a high odds of getting themself outted
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
shooting at mid day today and declaring it
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:03 pm@Jamie
It hinges on the fact that I was going to be gone all afternoon. The momentum felt, on my read, to be heading my way.
But if you are right, why would I do this as scum? That wouldn't make any sense either.
I WILL do what town wants. Of course, some of you aren't town. So can y'all give me a consensus?
Someone (I don't recall who) wrote that I should reveal if the person I investigated is a lead wagon. That makes sense.
It appears you are claiming Cop again since you're saying you have a scan.
So you want us to believe all of the following:
1. You claimed Cop because you're actually the Cop and four votes on you caused you to shit yourself in terror, AND:
2. You then retracted your claim during the night but somehow still hoped scum would NK you, AND:
3. You've now revived your claim again and you're claiming you can clear someone, AND:
4. You want town to endhammer you if we don't believe you.
Looking at all this, I feel like the only explanations are either (a) you've played very badly, or (b) you're scum.
Maybe I have too much respect for you.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I was actually thinking more along the lines of testing his gunniness, but yes... but still revealing, I think, at EoN no matter what.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:19 pmRevealing only if he’s gonna shoot your scan?dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:14 pmIMO there was no wolf attempt last night. At least not a successful one. We had one death. Scum killed vecna. They would not have driven their own death target. (I suppose they might have done a switcheroo thing, but why would they risk other actions with someone in the game who can watch them?) They killed vecna as a fear-kill. But isn’t it pretty well standard to RB the one you kill as scum?
So maybe kak doesn’t really have the gun.
Only one way to find out.
Kak, announce your target and shoot someone 24 hours out from EoD.
Does this make sense?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
ww would possibly just holster til every idiot has claimed
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I that Hamilton disappearing after your claim is somewhat wsuspicious, considering he's one of your top scumreads. He could be spooked, and it kind of reminds me of him avoiding the thread after he started to get pressure for his votes a couple games ago.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:14 pmI don't think it's good to shoot or endvote dargo today (I might be wrong, but that are my thoughts)
I would love to hear more from maniac and rd, also I haven't really seen anything from hamilton since he heard fromt he gun.
I didn't like worcej's interactions with kgray, but they seemed to come at least from a somewhat towny perspective, so I shall never say anything about them again.
I need to go to work, when I come back I need more especially on maniac, he has been laying much too low.
Anyway, see you later!
Can you actually say why you think worcej is coming from a towny perspective? I really don't think he is.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
How has Brainbomb posted 110 times in the current phase when I've only posted 10 times including this post?
Brainbomb, post less please.
Brainbomb, post less please.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Well, yes on 1. As I have said. It's what it seemed to me, and I was going to be gone.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:24 pmdargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:03 pm@Jamie
It hinges on the fact that I was going to be gone all afternoon. The momentum felt, on my read, to be heading my way.
But if you are right, why would I do this as scum? That wouldn't make any sense either.
I WILL do what town wants. Of course, some of you aren't town. So can y'all give me a consensus?
Someone (I don't recall who) wrote that I should reveal if the person I investigated is a lead wagon. That makes sense.
It appears you are claiming Cop again since you're saying you have a scan.
So you want us to believe all of the following:
1. You claimed Cop because you're actually the Cop and four votes on you caused you to shit yourself in terror, AND:
2. You then retracted your claim during the night but somehow still hoped scum would NK you, AND:
3. You've now revived your claim again and you're claiming you can clear someone, AND:
4. You want town to endhammer you if we don't believe you.
Looking at all this, I feel like the only explanations are either (a) you've played very badly, or (b) you're scum.
Maybe I have too much respect for you.
2... 'hoped'? no... expected. And I hoped to muddy the waters, particular for the ww.
3. yes, although clear is too strong a word.
4. I want town to endhammer as an indicator that they don't believe me, and i will reveal and at least town'll have that info.
Maybe you do.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
ok, ill be back later sorryJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:25 pmHow has Brainbomb posted 110 times in the current phase when I've only posted 10 times including this post?
Brainbomb, post less please.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I think if someone claims they will use a gun, and you think your scan is likely to be their target, then yes you should claim, similar to claiming before EOD if your scan is on the block. Having someone who is sort of townclear dying is a waste.dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:47 pmHoping there is a gun.Chaqa wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:45 pmAye. Throw Maniac in as well, and you have the 8 I want to flip two of todayzdargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:43 pm
Do you mean this list?
- Yavu
- Worcej
- Rivera
- ghug
- Hamilton
- Jamiet
- Macca
IF the person is in the list, you are saying i should reveal before the shooter shoots?
What do others think about that?
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Ah, ok. Sure. Assuming kak is going to be on.
I'm gone for awhile. I will be back to check if kak is shooting.
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Is there any reason for kak NOT to announce exactly who he is shooting? So I don't have to guess?kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:28 pmI think if someone claims they will use a gun, and you think your scan is likely to be their target, then yes you should claim, similar to claiming before EOD if your scan is on the block. Having someone who is sort of townclear dying is a waste.dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:47 pmHoping there is a gun.
IF the person is in the list, you are saying i should reveal before the shooter shoots?
What do others think about that?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Oh great point. If nobody has an item then one of damo or Jamie is basically confirmed scum. There's no way Vecna wouldn't have given something out. But the issue is that even if kak doesn't have a gun, that doesn't mean nobody got an item.dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:14 pmIMO there was no wolf attempt last night. At least not a successful one. We had one death. Scum killed vecna. They would not have driven their own death target. (I suppose they might have done a switcheroo thing, but why would they risk other actions with someone in the game who can watch them?) They killed vecna as a fear-kill. But isn’t it pretty well standard to RB the one you kill as scum?
So maybe kak doesn’t really have the gun.
Only one way to find out.
Kak, announce your target and shoot someone 24 hours out from EoD.
Does this make sense?
But I still think announcing a target or fake EOD is a good idea.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Wait, brain... can *you* see into the future?? lmao
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Not that I can think of? And I know claims are iffy in this setup but it seems like it'd be better to claim before shooting regardless.dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:30 pmIs there any reason for kak NOT to announce exactly who he is shooting? So I don't have to guess?kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:28 pmI think if someone claims they will use a gun, and you think your scan is likely to be their target, then yes you should claim, similar to claiming before EOD if your scan is on the block. Having someone who is sort of townclear dying is a waste.dargorygel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:47 pm
Hoping there is a gun.
IF the person is in the list, you are saying i should reveal before the shooter shoots?
What do others think about that?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, SaintSimmer