MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1941 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:18 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:31 am
Darg, you should reveal that information at some point so we don’t risk wasting the day DKing your inno scan, but no rush.
He should only reveal if the target is a top wagon or he worries that he's going to be killed.


celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1943 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:27 am

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:50 am
darg is unccd with an inno scan and was not even rbd
I think this means that we have a watcher (or darg is mafia). Otherwise, you're right that he's the obvious rb target.

celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1944 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:27 am

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:53 am
good night
Waiting for you to fall asleep before posting. :-D

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1945 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:31 am

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:09 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:48 am
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:34 am


You were bringing up something that was irrelevant and based on ghug's misunderstanding, and you said that you realized it was a misunderstanding but pressed it anyway. I didn't feel attacked, I feel like you're trying to jump off of ghug's misinterpretation of what happened to cause drama or get me riled up or whatever.
I'll be explicitly clear: I've seen you brush off the good compliment with references to be bad a lot and it's making me go :?
I don't know why tf you're still talking about this but I'm over it and I think you're making up nonsense reasons to pretend to have an opinion on this game.

##vote worcej
So is this also why you want to shoot me?

celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1946 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:31 am

foodcoats wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:51 am
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:50 am
darg is unccd with an inno scan and was not even rbd
Yeah and darg jumped the gun on a fake claim when I was scum with him.

...

YEET THAT YEAST

##VOTE dargorygel
This gives me flashbacks to scum Bona. It's anti-town, but you're saying it in a way that's so confident and carefree that it makes me think you're town. It also goes well with the comments D1 that you were jumping from idea to idea as the game went as if you have no agenda to fulfill. It'll probably get you dk'd at some point, but here are some hesitant town points.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1947 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:32 am

dargorygel wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:30 am
My innocent investigation is not as nice as it might appear.
a) driver could have messed me up, and given me the scan on someone else.
b) the person I investigated, if the ww, would result in an inno.
c) and obviously, could be a godfather.
Pretty sure you would know if your result was impacted by the driver.

celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1948 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:32 am

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:31 am
I do not believe the werewolf tried to kill darg.
If darg was saved he should have claimed that so this seems like a safe assumption.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1949 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:33 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:33 am
So either:
1. Dargo didn’t know this because he isn’t the cop or
2. Dargo didn’t know this because he didn’t read the setup

We know he has to read the setup for his council role.

So darg is lying about being cop?
Chaqa doing the lords work right here.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1950 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:34 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:46 am
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:42 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:35 am
Or he didn’t read the setup as thoroughly as he should or forgot this part of it...
Why was darg supposed to read the setup more thoroughly than others?
To approve it for the Council?
This is actually a good point.

celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1951 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:35 am

Bonatogether wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:49 am
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:36 am
Bonatogether wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:20 am


You were not on the ball that game but you're still pretty good.
Yo I was *shocked* when I found out it was you and Bob. That was so impressive lol
I should have been nailed days earlier.
All us aliens were hogging the town DK spotlight giving you an easy pass. But also, you and Bob played really well. If I had suspected something I would have tried to RB one of you.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1952 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:36 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:56 am
So, here's some general precepts I've got right now to think about this:
1. The RHK voters are *most likely* mostly town. I would imagine if a bus occurred at all, it was Maniac or kgray, based on the lateness of Maniac's vote and kgray leaving and coming back. I don't think celaph or food are bussing there.
2. I think Kakarot is town, based on him being a counterwagon to RHK. I had thought his voters were scummy, but it seems like Dargo is good, and brain seems town enough. Damo could be cleared *IFF we find out for sure he was roleblocked by scum and not a town RBer.

Putting this together, I think the most likely people to be scum are in the group that isn't mentioned above. That leaves, to me:
- Yavu
- Worcej
- Rivera
- ghug
- Hamilton
- Jamiet
- Macca

If possible, I think Kak should shoot one of these group (since with Darg re-claiming I don't think we should jump to flip him yet) or maybe Maniac, since I'm pretty sure he's scum.

Would everyone agree that, *generally*, that's a good list to look in? I know after the game where ghug, Bozo, and Durga bussed day 1, we're all a bit scarred, but it feels like that didn't happen here given how close the wagons were. If scum were on RHK, they could easily have moved to a different wagon without much backlash and gotten Kak, HB, or even brainbomb killed.
Even with me included in the list, I think your list is good for putting a bullet into one of us.

celaph
Posts: 2144
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:41 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1953 Post by celaph » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:36 am

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:29 am
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:07 am
Fluminator wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:00 am
Brain's suggestion that ghug mispelled Demon on purpaose to avoid being searched up later in the game has me believe Brain is on the ball this game.

I'll endorse his Celaph target for now.
I'd rather we daykill celaph. He'll care enough to fight back.
Agreed on this, and celaph's alignment is pretty obvious when he's on the block.***

***except that one time he tricked me ridiculously badly, but that was targeted pocketing and won't work anymore. The other two times it's bee very obvious to me and most people what his alignment was.
:razz: :smirk: :-D

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1954 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:37 am

Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:56 am
So, here's some general precepts I've got right now to think about this:
1. The RHK voters are *most likely* mostly town. I would imagine if a bus occurred at all, it was Maniac or kgray, based on the lateness of Maniac's vote and kgray leaving and coming back. I don't think celaph or food are bussing there.
2. I think Kakarot is town, based on him being a counterwagon to RHK. I had thought his voters were scummy, but it seems like Dargo is good, and brain seems town enough. Damo could be cleared *IFF we find out for sure he was roleblocked by scum and not a town RBer.

Putting this together, I think the most likely people to be scum are in the group that isn't mentioned above. That leaves, to me:
- Yavu
- Worcej
- Rivera
- ghug
- Hamilton
- Jamiet
- Macca

If possible, I think Kak should shoot one of these group (since with Darg re-claiming I don't think we should jump to flip him yet) or maybe Maniac, since I'm pretty sure he's scum.

Would everyone agree that, *generally*, that's a good list to look in? I know after the game where ghug, Bozo, and Durga bussed day 1, we're all a bit scarred, but it feels like that didn't happen here given how close the wagons were. If scum were on RHK, they could easily have moved to a different wagon without much backlash and gotten Kak, HB, or even brainbomb killed.
When we catch scum day one, there's usually a deep busser. This is the same simplistic logic you used to avoid having useful opinions the last time you were scum.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1955 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:38 am

celaph wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:27 am
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:50 am
darg is unccd with an inno scan and was not even rbd
I think this means that we have a watcher (or darg is mafia). Otherwise, you're right that he's the obvious rb target.
Why would darg be RB’ed in this setup?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1956 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:40 am

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:38 am
celaph wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:27 am
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:50 am
darg is unccd with an inno scan and was not even rbd
I think this means that we have a watcher (or darg is mafia). Otherwise, you're right that he's the obvious rb target.
Why would darg be RB’ed in this setup?
For being the cop?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1957 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:44 am

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:40 am
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:38 am
celaph wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:27 am


I think this means that we have a watcher (or darg is mafia). Otherwise, you're right that he's the obvious rb target.
Why would darg be RB’ed in this setup?
For being the cop?
I’ll rephrase this then: how would he be RB’ed in this setup?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1958 Post by brainbomb » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:45 am

there are currently two rb claims
damo
jamie

and maf have a factional rb

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 13235
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1959 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:46 am

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:45 am
there are currently two rb claims
damo
jamie

and maf have a factional rb
That’s what I needed to know.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 14306
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#1960 Post by Chaqa » Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:47 am

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 4:37 am
Chaqa wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:56 am
So, here's some general precepts I've got right now to think about this:
1. The RHK voters are *most likely* mostly town. I would imagine if a bus occurred at all, it was Maniac or kgray, based on the lateness of Maniac's vote and kgray leaving and coming back. I don't think celaph or food are bussing there.
2. I think Kakarot is town, based on him being a counterwagon to RHK. I had thought his voters were scummy, but it seems like Dargo is good, and brain seems town enough. Damo could be cleared *IFF we find out for sure he was roleblocked by scum and not a town RBer.

Putting this together, I think the most likely people to be scum are in the group that isn't mentioned above. That leaves, to me:
- Yavu
- Worcej
- Rivera
- ghug
- Hamilton
- Jamiet
- Macca

If possible, I think Kak should shoot one of these group (since with Darg re-claiming I don't think we should jump to flip him yet) or maybe Maniac, since I'm pretty sure he's scum.

Would everyone agree that, *generally*, that's a good list to look in? I know after the game where ghug, Bozo, and Durga bussed day 1, we're all a bit scarred, but it feels like that didn't happen here given how close the wagons were. If scum were on RHK, they could easily have moved to a different wagon without much backlash and gotten Kak, HB, or even brainbomb killed.
When we catch scum day one, there's usually a deep busser. This is the same simplistic logic you used to avoid having useful opinions the last time you were scum.
I'm not saying there isn't a busser, but Chaqccam's Razor says we shouldn't be tinfoiling so early. And I don't know what logic you're talking about, last game I was scum was (I think) the one where I won 11v1? I remember working my ass off that game.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]