Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6301 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:17 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:11 pm
I thought you hated discord.
I abhor Discord for anything other than 1-to-1 chats, for which is acceptable. I prefer to use Messenger for that to be honest but that only works if your co-GM is also your Facebook friend.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6302 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:12 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:11 pm

Why would scum!Rdrivera announce himself in the WT-QT ?
Everyone else was doing it and he needed an item alibi.
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6303 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:12 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:11 pm

Why would scum!Rdrivera announce himself in the WT-QT ?
Everyone else was doing it and he needed an item alibi.
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
It was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6304 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:12 pm


Everyone else was doing it and he needed an item alibi.
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
It was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.
You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6305 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm


What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
It was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.
You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.
Huh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6306 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pm


It was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.
You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.
Huh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.
This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6307 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pm


You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.
Huh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.
This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.
Huh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6308 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:42 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pm


Huh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.
This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.
Huh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.
Why do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6309 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:42 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pm


This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.
Huh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.
Why do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?
I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.

I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6310 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:51 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.
Semantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.

Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".

When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6311 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:52 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:42 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pm


Huh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.
Why do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?
I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.

I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.
I have to agree with Ghug on this, revealing on QT is NAI as it has nothing to do with alignment. Jamiet had a point that keep hiding (there coulde be 2 to 4 in QT) could be the best approach. And massclaim isn't a big problem with Item Thief. It could be a problem if more then one scum have the sat phobe but it isn't the case.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6312 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:54 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:51 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.
Semantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.

Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".

When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.
I wanted my position to be clear. I still answered the question, didn't I?

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6313 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:54 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:51 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.
Semantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.

Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".

When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.
Jamiet, from my POV it's easy to understand. One of them is scum, so he gets the conclusion that fits his plan (getting me miskilled if it's Ghug or buddy me if it's Maniac).

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6314 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:58 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:12 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:11 pm

Why would scum!Rdrivera announce himself in the WT-QT ?
Everyone else was doing it and he needed an item alibi.
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
Not true. Jasnah was the first to revel his identity both in QT and on the main thread later. Maniac was the second to reveal on QT and I was the third (basically because I didn't open the QT before my situation was sorted by the GMs).

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7168
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6315 Post by dargorygel » Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:30 pm

VotE CoUNt 9.03
Ghug (3) Maniac, rdrivera2005, Jamiet99uk
Rdrivera2005 (1) ghug

Maniac is hammering.

ghug has the most votes.

Day ends in 3.5 hours

Maniac
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6316 Post by Maniac » Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:11 pm

ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.
This old chestnut, let’s call maniac crazy if he says something we disagree with because crazy=maniac always. More importantly though the comment “Maybe Maniac thinks it’s townie because he did it” - strong sense here that Ghug knows I’m town rather than reading me as town.

Maniac
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6317 Post by Maniac » Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:13 pm

I’m too busy to re-read from the start but this stuff about mass item claiming hardly came up at all. Maybe Ghug is misremembering and it was spoken about in the scum chat? If you search ‘mass’ on the bot there is very little mention of it until recently.

Maniac
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6318 Post by Maniac » Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:19 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:58 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:12 pm


Everyone else was doing it and he needed an item alibi.
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?

At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.

I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
Not true. Jasnah was the first to revel his identity both in QT and on the main thread later. Maniac was the second to reveal on QT and I was the third (basically because I didn't open the QT before my situation was sorted by the GMs).
Just for the record Rdriveria reveal just before EON1 but had
Anonymous posts prior. It’s possible EMC revealed 3rd but any evidence has been erased.

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6319 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:58 pm

Maniac wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:11 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pm

I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.
This old chestnut, let’s call maniac crazy if he says something we disagree with because crazy=maniac always. More importantly though the comment “Maybe Maniac thinks it’s townie because he did it” - strong sense here that Ghug knows I’m town rather than reading me as town.
I gave the scum motivation and the town motivation right next to each other...

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]

#6320 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:59 pm

Maniac wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:13 pm
I’m too busy to re-read from the start but this stuff about mass item claiming hardly came up at all. Maybe Ghug is misremembering and it was spoken about in the scum chat? If you search ‘mass’ on the bot there is very little mention of it until recently.
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?wo ... claim&g=65

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Spartaculous