I abhor Discord for anything other than 1-to-1 chats, for which is acceptable. I prefer to use Messenger for that to be honest but that only works if your co-GM is also your Facebook friend.
Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
It was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pmWhat do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pmIt was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pmWhat do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Huh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pmYou're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:25 pmIt was obvious from the start that there was potential for a massclaim and people would need to use their items plausibly.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pm
What do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pmHuh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pmYou're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Huh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pmThis doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:31 pmHuh? I'm saying he'd be aware for the potential for massclaim and know that he can't claim to have the item he actually has if he hasn't been behaving like town in the phone QT.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:26 pm
You're behaving as if Rdrivera has been lying about being in the Walkie Talkie QT.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Why do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pmHuh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pmThis doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
I'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:42 pmWhy do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:39 pmHuh? He can verify that he has the item easily. I'm saying if he doesn't reveal his name and everyone else does, there's reason to be suspicious of him whenever it does come out.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:34 pm
This doesn't make sense. He could have used a codeword or crumb of some kind in the phone QT rather than simply fully revealing himself, and achieve just the same result with less risk.
I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Semantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.
Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".
When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
I have to agree with Ghug on this, revealing on QT is NAI as it has nothing to do with alignment. Jamiet had a point that keep hiding (there coulde be 2 to 4 in QT) could be the best approach. And massclaim isn't a big problem with Item Thief. It could be a problem if more then one scum have the sat phobe but it isn't the case.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:44 pmI'm not drawing the opposite conclusion. I think revealing yourself in the sat QT is NAI.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:42 pmWhy do you think that you and Maniac are drawing precisely the opposite conclusions from this?
I think Maniac is crazy, mostly. Maybe he thinks it's townie because he did it. Maybe he wants to portray it as townie so that rd will give him a reciprocal read.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
I wanted my position to be clear. I still answered the question, didn't I?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:51 pmSemantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.
Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".
When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Jamiet, from my POV it's easy to understand. One of them is scum, so he gets the conclusion that fits his plan (getting me miskilled if it's Ghug or buddy me if it's Maniac).Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:51 pmSemantics. You are drawing significantly different conclusions from each other.
Maniac thinks this detail strongly indicates Rdriveria is town, you're convinced it does not. These are very different viewpoints, however much you want to have a debate about the dictionary definition of "opposite".
When did you become this pedantic anyway? That's Damo's job.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Not true. Jasnah was the first to revel his identity both in QT and on the main thread later. Maniac was the second to reveal on QT and I was the third (basically because I didn't open the QT before my situation was sorted by the GMs).Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pmWhat do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
- dargorygel
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7168
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
- Location: Over the rainbow
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
VotE CoUNt 9.03
Ghug (3) Maniac, rdrivera2005, Jamiet99uk
Rdrivera2005 (1) ghug
Maniac is hammering.
ghug has the most votes.
Day ends in 3.5 hours
Ghug (3) Maniac, rdrivera2005, Jamiet99uk
Rdrivera2005 (1) ghug
Maniac is hammering.
ghug has the most votes.
Day ends in 3.5 hours
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
- Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
This old chestnut, let’s call maniac crazy if he says something we disagree with because crazy=maniac always. More importantly though the comment “Maybe Maniac thinks it’s townie because he did it” - strong sense here that Ghug knows I’m town rather than reading me as town.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
- Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
I’m too busy to re-read from the start but this stuff about mass item claiming hardly came up at all. Maybe Ghug is misremembering and it was spoken about in the scum chat? If you search ‘mass’ on the bot there is very little mention of it until recently.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:20 am
- Location: https://www.parliament.uk/
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Just for the record Rdriveria reveal just before EON1 but hadrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:58 pmNot true. Jasnah was the first to revel his identity both in QT and on the main thread later. Maniac was the second to reveal on QT and I was the third (basically because I didn't open the QT before my situation was sorted by the GMs).Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 5:21 pmWhat do you mean "he needed an item alibi"?
At the time Rdrivera would have revealed in the Walkie Talkie QT, lots of people hadn't revealed their items.
I got the impression Rdrivera revealed in that QT a while before Maniac did, no?
Anonymous posts prior. It’s possible EMC revealed 3rd but any evidence has been erased.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
I gave the scum motivation and the town motivation right next to each other...Maniac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:11 pmThis old chestnut, let’s call maniac crazy if he says something we disagree with because crazy=maniac always. More importantly though the comment “Maybe Maniac thinks it’s townie because he did it” - strong sense here that Ghug knows I’m town rather than reading me as town.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: PRINCE WILLIAM