I was sort of voting him to make scum nervous. for shits n giggles likerdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 11:39 amWell, I always scumread Fox when he is PR (last time we both were we fought until it was obvious). He is far from confirmed but I agree with your take on GMs message, which is not great, but we can't ignore it.
I still think Ghug is Alien, I just don't feel any passion at all on him, even as scum he would at least be pissed with Brain and an overpowered Alien. Not sure I want to go all on on this. Maybe just killing Damo and having another night is the safe play, I really don't know here, trusting scum isn't great too.
@Vecna, would you try to convince us Worcej is the Alien?
Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Why are you ignoring mafia Vecna entirely?damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:10 pmWe know item thief is alive so I think the possible combos are
ALIEN ---- ITEM THIEF ----- SCUM PARTNER
Bob ------- ghug -------------- worcej/Maniac/rdr
Bob ------- worcej ----------- ghug/Maniac/rdr
worcej ---- ghug ------------- Maniac/rdr
ghug ------- worcej ---------- Maniac/rdr
@Jamie @Vecna @Fox
thoughts?
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
because the only way I can be scum is if both the gm has lied a third time and fox is scum with me
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Damo, why did you give up on asserting that there were five infected people when nobody was calling you on it?
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
It's unclear to me whether there's actually some mechanical nuance I'm missing that clears you or if you're just being Vecna.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
The desperate attempt to fearmonger was one of the few bits of your play I was likingdamo666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:47 pmCurrent count
T M A A&I N
6 2 1 5 4 (presumably)
scum allow my miskill
5 2 1 4 4
N6 scum kill town infectee
4 2 1 3 4
but alien infects so
4 2 1 4 3 alien wins
So scum must NK/target alien
5 2 1 4 4
but alien infects
5 2 1 5 3 alien wins
SCUM HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL US WHO ALIEN IS SINCE THEY KNOW I AM TOWN
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
That's four infectees plus Alien, not five.ghug wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:52 pmThe desperate attempt to fearmonger was one of the few bits of your play I was likingdamo666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:47 pmCurrent count
T M A A&I N
6 2 1 5 4 (presumably)
scum allow my miskill
5 2 1 4 4
N6 scum kill town infectee
4 2 1 3 4
but alien infects so
4 2 1 4 3 alien wins
So scum must NK/target alien
5 2 1 4 4
but alien infects
5 2 1 5 3 alien wins
SCUM HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL US WHO ALIEN IS SINCE THEY KNOW I AM TOWN
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
He told me that A&I was infected count and N was uninfected count.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:20 pmThat's four infectees plus Alien, not five.ghug wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:52 pmThe desperate attempt to fearmonger was one of the few bits of your play I was likingdamo666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:47 pmCurrent count
T M A A&I N
6 2 1 5 4 (presumably)
scum allow my miskill
5 2 1 4 4
N6 scum kill town infectee
4 2 1 3 4
but alien infects so
4 2 1 4 3 alien wins
So scum must NK/target alien
5 2 1 4 4
but alien infects
5 2 1 5 3 alien wins
SCUM HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL US WHO ALIEN IS SINCE THEY KNOW I AM TOWN
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Excuse me, technically a PR who had been CC'd by an incorrect GM "clarification" which has now been reversed.Maniac wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:14 amYou’ve surpassed your worst logic ever post from earlier. If it wasn’t for Jamie trying to kill unCC’d PR you’d stand alone as LVPdamo666 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:08 amVecna cannot be alien unless dead infectee so tomorrow you should vote within
worcej ghug Bob
Examining each in turn as alien my guess at scum pair is as follows:
ALIEN ----------------- Mafia
Bob ‐---------------- ghug and worcej
ghug ------------------ worcej and struggling
Worcej -------‐----------- ghug and struggling
Bob must be the alien
##vote Bob
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
If you can't work out what "A" and "I" stand for in that context, I'm sorry for you.ghug wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:21 pmHe told me that A&I was infected count and N was uninfected count.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
We are currently 3 + Alien max
implies 2 dead infectees (celaph + ?) or alien went for a kill and failed (unlikely)
implies 2 dead infectees (celaph + ?) or alien went for a kill and failed (unlikely)
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Exactly.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:22 pmIf you can't work out what "A" and "I" stand for in that context, I'm sorry for you.
The A&I number in that post is 5, not 4, and it's not a mistake because it predicated the rest of the logic. At the time I thought he was just trying to make things seem more dire than they were, which seemed like a good thing to do, but then he dropped it, and I want to know why.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
Correct but starting point should have read 6 2 1 4 5ghug wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:21 pmHe told me that A&I was infected count and N was uninfected count.
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
But all the numbers follow from the first ones, as do the conclusions. Did you actually just fuck it up that badly?
Re: Mafia 65: Dreamland II [Hidden]
It worked on Jamie!ghug wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:27 pmExactly.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:22 pmIf you can't work out what "A" and "I" stand for in that context, I'm sorry for you.
The A&I number in that post is 5, not 4, and it's not a mistake because it predicated the rest of the logic. At the time I thought he was just trying to make things seem more dire than they were, which seemed like a good thing to do, but then he dropped it, and I want to know why.
Just an error in the top line which followed through and I got all excited.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]