Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:00 pmNo, I considered what the best strategy would be for each faction, and I put out reasons. No one has pointed out anything wrong with it ("scum would do x, but you said y"). Everyone who has gone against it has done nothing more than say "it's dumb and entirely opinion-based."
The problem isn't that the strategies described are necessarily wrong. The problem is that you immediately went "next level" with the strategies. You implicitly assumed, "Oh! Well if that's the correct strategy, then they'll obviously not do that!"
I reread 6 or 7 players to get a better feel for them, and I already stated that the best play for the player is to shift your town meta towards the best play for the faction.Then you listed your opinions with no research on what people were doing. Then you didn’t even match impressions to role guesses because that’s all just opinion anyways.
OK. You don't need to impress us with a read on every player. There were enough weird things like the statements about players that seemed you hadn't read them, or the misalignment with what you said you were looking for with an SK but then saying "oh...but that's not an SK thing here." It just felt forced. Like you knew the answer and then wrote the post.
This is absolute bullshit and you know it. I've been reading the thread, I've been posting, I've been putting out my ideas (compare my posting the last 2 games to this one), so there's absolutely no basis for you to claim that I've done no reading.You just put out something to seem like you were solving, but in fact demonstrated you’d done no reading at all?
This is true.
MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
kgray wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:04 amApparently I was better at getting under his skin than he predicted![]()
Could be
There's a difference between HR freaking out on me at EOD and the team coming up with a plan to try to salvage it at night, but that's really not my point at all. You can't say things like "aliens did this sub-optimally and therefore they're inexperienced" when the only alien that's flipped is one of the most experienced players in the game. It's a bad argument and I think it's just a little too convenient considering you're pushing the wagons of two relatively inexperienced players.
Fair enough. I like to ascribe the philosophy that people have reasons they think are good for their plays (in life, games, whatever). That when you see something suboptimal, it's still something they had a reason to say, "aha! here's my play!" But the issue then is, how did they come to a suboptimal play? How can you exploit it?
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
BunnyGo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:11 am
The problem isn't that the strategies described are necessarily wrong. The problem is that you immediately went "next level" with the strategies. You implicitly assumed, "Oh! Well if that's the correct strategy, then they'll obviously not do that!"
OK. You don't need to impress us with a read on every player. There were enough weird things like the statements about players that seemed you hadn't read them, or the misalignment with what you said you were looking for with an SK but then saying "oh...but that's not an SK thing here." It just felt forced. Like you knew the answer and then wrote the post.
This is true.
1) ??? I tried to match it up as best I could, so I'm unsure what you're talking about
2) I guess? But how do I know every player's alignment and then write the post? That part doesn't make sense to me.
3) So then why do you say I haven't?
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Oh, I like this argument a lot emc (and not because I know I just did the same thing). So Macca likely not teammates with either HR or ghug.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
1) kgray and I asked you multiple times about why you said SK would have "solvy" tendencies, but then all the players you listed as solvy were not on your SK list.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:17 amBunnyGo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:11 am
The problem isn't that the strategies described are necessarily wrong. The problem is that you immediately went "next level" with the strategies. You implicitly assumed, "Oh! Well if that's the correct strategy, then they'll obviously not do that!"
OK. You don't need to impress us with a read on every player. There were enough weird things like the statements about players that seemed you hadn't read them, or the misalignment with what you said you were looking for with an SK but then saying "oh...but that's not an SK thing here." It just felt forced. Like you knew the answer and then wrote the post.
This is true.
1) ??? I tried to match it up as best I could, so I'm unsure what you're talking about
2) I guess? But how do I know every player's alignment and then write the post? That part doesn't make sense to me.
3) So then why do you say I haven't?
2) Exactly. It looks scummy. That's how you know. (Still town reading you, but despite this post)
3) Because it looked like you'd been not reading when you made a post saying things about all the players that were gut rather than just the 7 you read. It's true you've been reading and participating. I overstated the issue because of the previous things.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
oh good were in the fsociety phase of the game where we color all our posts
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
1) I made the reads that I thought were best.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:21 am1) kgray and I asked you multiple times about why you said SK would have "solvy" tendencies, but then all the players you listed as solvy were not on your SK list.
2) Exactly. It looks scummy. That's how you know. (Still town reading you, but despite this post)
3) Because it looked like you'd been not reading when you made a post saying things about all the players that were gut rather than just the 7 you read. It's true you've been reading and participating. I overstated the issue because of the previous things.
2) But even if I am scum, I still cannot know everyone's alignment, because of the second scumteam. Your point is wrong.
3) I based my reads on my theory to the greatest extent possible, so I don't buy this except as an attempt to rile me up.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Like, celaph was pretty clearly supposed to be the kill tomorrow, but now looks like that's gotta just be ghug.
Clearly he kept too much anger pent up over HR playing like that and didn't release it effectively causing the slip.
Clearly he kept too much anger pent up over HR playing like that and didn't release it effectively causing the slip.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
1) As you sayBonatogether wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:25 am1) I made the reads that I thought were best.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:21 am1) kgray and I asked you multiple times about why you said SK would have "solvy" tendencies, but then all the players you listed as solvy were not on your SK list.
2) Exactly. It looks scummy. That's how you know. (Still town reading you, but despite this post)
3) Because it looked like you'd been not reading when you made a post saying things about all the players that were gut rather than just the 7 you read. It's true you've been reading and participating. I overstated the issue because of the previous things.
2) But even if I am scum, I still cannot know everyone's alignment, because of the second scumteam. Your point is wrong.
3) I based my reads on my theory to the greatest extent possible, so I don't buy this except as an attempt to rile me up.
2) The point is that you had predetermined goals. Not that they were all correct. You reads are not all correct.
3) I'm saying I overstated the issue.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Keep doing you bona. You're probably better off ignoring them when you get asked dumb, accusatory questions.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:25 am1) I made the reads that I thought were best.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:21 am1) kgray and I asked you multiple times about why you said SK would have "solvy" tendencies, but then all the players you listed as solvy were not on your SK list.
2) Exactly. It looks scummy. That's how you know. (Still town reading you, but despite this post)
3) Because it looked like you'd been not reading when you made a post saying things about all the players that were gut rather than just the 7 you read. It's true you've been reading and participating. I overstated the issue because of the previous things.
2) But even if I am scum, I still cannot know everyone's alignment, because of the second scumteam. Your point is wrong.
3) I based my reads on my theory to the greatest extent possible, so I don't buy this except as an attempt to rile me up.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
I accidentally said "us" when referring to the town, revealing that I am, in fact, town.
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
Now I feel like you're trying to slip....
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]
2) I'd be surprised if they were, since it's a different approach to take, but I think it's decently (>60%) accurate.
3) Ok.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, DiplomacyandWarfare, SaintSimmer, Spartaculous