MAFIA 64 - The Z Files - Game Thread [HIDDEN]

[Bonatogether]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Does the QT actually show how many people there are? I don't remember anything like this.

[DemonRHK]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Words Bunny. You tap keys and they appear on the screen. The strongest of the lover roles is not town alligned.

Or is all you want to vote kill on as little info asa possible and wait to see anywhere between zero to three (or more even) kills N1.

[BunnyGo]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Does the QT actually show how many people there are? I don't remember anything like this.

Lover
You are the LOVER. Each day you must vote for a suspect. You are in love with <NAME(S)> and may communicate with them at any time in a QT, the link for which will be supplied when the game begins. If you die, your lover(s) will simultaneously die with you, and if your lover(s) die(s), you will simultaneously die as well. You win when all non-town Factions are defeated, or nothing can stop this from happening.
(PASSIVE, COMMUNICATIVE)

[Bonatogether]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Does the QT actually show how many people there are? I don't remember anything like this.

Lover
You are the LOVER. Each day you must vote for a suspect. You are in love with <NAME(S)> and may communicate with them at any time in a QT, the link for which will be supplied when the game begins. If you die, your lover(s) will simultaneously die with you, and if your lover(s) die(s), you will simultaneously die as well. You win when all non-town Factions are defeated, or nothing can stop this from happening.
(PASSIVE, COMMUNICATIVE)

Ah.

[BunnyGo]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Words Bunny. You tap keys and they appear on the screen. The strongest of the lover roles is not town alligned.

Or is all you want to vote kill on as little info asa possible and wait to see anywhere between zero to three (or more even) kills N1.

Why ask the lovers to give up their on power now? They only have one use before dying, and you're asking them to not even bother trying.

[DemonRHK]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Does the QT actually show how many people there are? I don't remember anything like this.

Had to double check, and lovers are told all of the other lovers in the role PM

[Bonatogether]

So I had a crazy thought.

IF (maybe a big if) we have a town lover, one could out with only the NUMBER of people in the QT. That would provide a bit of info, especially if there 4+.

I would like thoughts on this idea.

Does the QT actually show how many people there are? I don't remember anything like this.

Had to double check, and lovers are told all of the other lovers in the role PM

Thanks!

[BunnyGo]

Words Bunny. You tap keys and they appear on the screen. The strongest of the lover roles is not town alligned.

Or is all you want to vote kill on as little info asa possible and wait to see anywhere between zero to three (or more even) kills N1.

Why ask the lovers to give up their on power now? They only have one use before dying, and you're asking them to not even bother trying.

I'd sooner ask a mason to claim and announce how many masons we have. TO BE CLEAR: I'M NOT ADVOCATING THIS!!! JUST PREFERABLE TO A LOVER CLAIMING NOW.

[DemonRHK]

Words Bunny. You tap keys and they appear on the screen. The strongest of the lover roles is not town alligned.

Or is all you want to vote kill on as little info asa possible and wait to see anywhere between zero to three (or more even) kills N1.

Why ask the lovers to give up their on power now? They only have one use before dying, and you're asking them to not even bother trying.

Lover isn't really a power. It's neutral at best. And there is a strong possibility no scum would have taken mafia lover, but I think Alien BP lover could be on the table. And I agree it would be a risk. I mean, gee, if only we had like 6 different protective roles in the deck that may be able to save them. IF anyone cares enough to kill them (Which is mostly the SK)

[DemonRHK]

I understand being against the idea, I'm not wanting a claim (Yet, at least), I'm trying to facilitate conversation.

[BunnyGo]

Words Bunny. You tap keys and they appear on the screen. The strongest of the lover roles is not town alligned.

Or is all you want to vote kill on as little info asa possible and wait to see anywhere between zero to three (or more even) kills N1.

Why ask the lovers to give up their on power now? They only have one use before dying, and you're asking them to not even bother trying.

Lover isn't really a power. It's neutral at best. And there is a strong possibility no scum would have taken mafia lover, but I think Alien BP lover could be on the table. And I agree it would be a risk. I mean, gee, if only we had like 6 different protective roles in the deck that may be able to save them. IF anyone cares enough to kill them (Which is mostly the SK)

Clearly you and I think about this game differently. I think you're just wrong in this case, happens to the best of us. Lover can suicide at any point to get an Alien bulletproof (so long as nobody gets vanillaized).

[BunnyGo]

I understand being against the idea, I'm not wanting a claim (Yet, at least), I'm trying to facilitate conversation.

This is not a great topic. Let's focus on downsides to all claiming our discards.

[DemonRHK]

You bring up an interesting point, but I will table that for later should the day come.

So then my other idea I said earlier: Everyone that discarded a non-town role should claim it. It will narrow down the pool (Or give references to refer to for cases in the case of lying scumbos)

[BunnyGo]

You bring up an interesting point, but I will table that for later should the day come.

So then my other idea I said earlier: Everyone that discarded a non-town role should claim it. It will narrow down the pool (Or give references to refer to for cases in the case of lying scumbos)

OK, what would you say if I discarded the Vanillaizer?

[BunnyGo]

You bring up an interesting point, but I will table that for later should the day come.

So then my other idea I said earlier: Everyone that discarded a non-town role should claim it. It will narrow down the pool (Or give references to refer to for cases in the case of lying scumbos)

OK, what would you say if I discarded the Vanillaizer?

What if I discarded Serial Killer?

[BunnyGo]

You bring up an interesting point, but I will table that for later should the day come.

So then my other idea I said earlier: Everyone that discarded a non-town role should claim it. It will narrow down the pool (Or give references to refer to for cases in the case of lying scumbos)

OK, what would you say if I discarded the Vanillaizer?

What if I discarded Serial Killer?

What if I too discarded a goon?

[DemonRHK]

Then we have great info to operate off of. Both of those can be proven or disproven at some points. Which can lend oto townieness or prove guilt.

[BunnyGo]

Then we have great info to operate off of. Both of those can be proven or disproven at some points. Which can lend oto townieness or prove guilt.

Oh, really?

I think people claiming that much D1 is wrong

[ghug]

Then we have great info to operate off of. Both of those can be proven or disproven at some points. Which can lend oto townieness or prove guilt.

Oh, really?

I think people claiming that much D1 is wrong

What downside is there to that info being out there? It only helps us narrow down scum roles.

[DemonRHK]

Goon would create a different discussion.

Town has no reason to lie about what non-town roles are not in the game. Intentionally obsuring information that some of the various non-town factions already have seems completely anti-town