MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2927
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
GM Note:
Give peterlund all the +1’s
If you do not, you will be modkilled.
That is a joke. (Or is it? Better +1 him to be safe)
Give peterlund all the +1’s
If you do not, you will be modkilled.
That is a joke. (Or is it? Better +1 him to be safe)
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
##CallGM: Just curious as for the rationale for no player post +1ing? It hasn't seemed to cause any issues.Tom Bombadil wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:35 pmGM Note:
Give peterlund all the +1’s
If you do not, you will be modkilled.
That is a joke. (Or is it? Better +1 him to be safe)
Not appealing for a change, just wondering
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2927
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Because it has always been that way. To keep people from using +1 to signal other players. I understand that’s not as much concern now that you can see who +1’s a post - but it’s a real chore to do on mobile so I made the decision to ban it to save those people the chore of looking that up. That being said, I didn’t realize how bummed people would be about it so I’m open to getting rid of this in the futureChaqa wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:37 pm##CallGM: Just curious as for the rationale for no player post +1ing? It hasn't seemed to cause any issues.Tom Bombadil wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:35 pmGM Note:
Give peterlund all the +1’s
If you do not, you will be modkilled.
That is a joke. (Or is it? Better +1 him to be safe)
Not appealing for a change, just wondering
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
That makes sense. It's nigh impossible to view +1s on mobile (at least on iOS in Safari), so I do get that side of it. It does occur to me players (especially ones with a private chat) could use +1s as signals, so I think in the future maybe we allow +1 but disallow +1 signaling and it should be good.
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Once again, bozo twists his logic into continuing to justify flipping my slot...
He probably worked on the transcontinental railroad as a conductor in a past life, because he drives trains better than anyone around here!
He probably worked on the transcontinental railroad as a conductor in a past life, because he drives trains better than anyone around here!
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Good point Damo. I know I am probably a daykill at some point after last day, I see no problem with that, but at least I want to force scum to risk neck pushing my kill.
Chaqa is probably lazy town.
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
But FWIW, at least now you're starting to use my actual behavior for content.
Also of note: celaph is in the 'suspect for trying to protect ghug' group.
So... how did I not push for his DK exactly?
This is not true. Here is my vote:bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 8:29 amThen worcej voted for ghug all D2, without ever pushing for ghug to be the DK.
Which was because Eden made a long-winded post regarding ghug that was my same opinion.
This was me pushing on him for his voting reasons - it was curious how his position on if to flip my slot or not would be dependent on people. If ND was scum, as he was portraying, why would he be inconsistent with applying his vote?worcej wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 4:21 amReading this leads me to invalidate any portion of your ND concern on my case - if it was a driving factor, it should not matter who filled the slot.
This was me disagreeing with celaph's opinion on ghug and pointing out the flaw in his (celaph's) logic to not flip ghug.worcej wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:46 amThat was D1 that, we are now on D2 and he expressed similar laziness. That's the beef I have with it.celaph wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:12 amI don't think that ghug makes for a good kill today.
Rereading town PR ghug from last game I felt that much of his play now aligns with his play this game. He was very open that his D1 vote last game was more for someone he didn't want to play with than for someone who was particularly scummy. He
said as much.
Also of note: celaph is in the 'suspect for trying to protect ghug' group.
This was me specifically saying why I suspected ghug.
So... how did I not push for his DK exactly?
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
In what universe does a mafia team driving the discussion that dominantly still completely fail to protect its own from the day 2 kills? EOD2 is an astonishing failure of that team to protect itself. It should have been trivial to whip votes onto somebody like Bona throughout yesterday if that were the team.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 8:29 amWith all of these strange connections between ghug, PE, brainbomb, and BunnyGo, I think they could all be scum together. Also, with the potential mutual bussing between ghug and ND/worcej, as well as the reasons I previously suspected the ND/worcej slot, I think the remaining scum are worcej, PE, brainbomb, and BunnyGo.
Why do I ever bring up BunnyGo's posting history and spend two hours compiling data to prove it during a night phase as mafia there?
I think you may be right about brainbomb, and I haven't written off worcej yet, but the narrative of this game doesn't make sense with that team.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
I wish I can +1 more then 1 time. Thanks a lot for keeping that great tool working and improving. It's almost impossible to play only on phone without the bot.peterlund wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:22 pmAfter more log and code reading, code fixing and testing, I have good reasons to believe that this issue is fixed by today's commit on master.Hellenic Riot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:00 amThe bot going down at every EoD is getting really irritating, I have to say
https://github.com/plund/mafia/commits/master
In file mafia_lib.erl I changed so it it filters first and sorts after. Sorting smaller sets is faster. Also the last 60 secs before EoD, all messge info is removed. My tests show that the game_status page now responds a lot faster.
The reason for this problem was the constantly growing message database for all games that has been played so far in combination with some inefficient code that now is fixed.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Getting called lazy town by a guy with half the posts I have. :kappa:rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:15 pmGood point Damo. I know I am probably a daykill at some point after last day, I see no problem with that, but at least I want to force scum to risk neck pushing my kill.
Chaqa is probably lazy town.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
THROW HIM OUT THE AIRLOCKChaqa wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:42 pmI mean, I'm lock voting him tomorrow for retracting a hard claim.
That's literally what a hard claim means. If you retract, you die.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
I wouldn'tPresident Eden wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:53 pmIf I were Cop, I would be scanning worcej right now.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Learn to use the "preview" button if you are using multiple quote blocks.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Both good D3 wagons, for sure.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
If I were Cop I would probably not be interested in the advice of the peanut gallery.damo666 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:08 pmI wouldn'tPresident Eden wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:53 pmIf I were Cop, I would be scanning worcej right now.
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Not to start a dumb thread, but who would you scan instead?damo666 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:08 pmI wouldn'tPresident Eden wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:53 pmIf I were Cop, I would be scanning worcej right now.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
Where did I say any such thing? I don't remember "claiming" that at all. Also the idea that I have been "focussing pretty much only" on your fake roleblock claim is utter horse manure. It's only your inflated ego making you think that. I mentioned it, sure, but I spent a lot more of D2 successfully leading town to victory against the despicable Ghug.Vecna wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:37 pmTalk me through your thought process throughout all this stuff.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:00 pmI see Vecna has admitted his roleblock claim was fake. I don't necessarily scumread him for that. Standard Vecna stuff.
You've been focussing pretty much only on that claim ever since it happened.
First you claimed you'd only see it as town actually being RB'd, or scum
Re: MAFIA 63: THE SCOURGE [HIDDEN]
@bozo, if you're going to be scumreading people for not wanting to DK ghug then I have no idea why you're targeting worcej. As he pointed out here, I'm the person that fits that description the best. If you want other people who disliked the ghug wagon you can consider aaro or Durga (now flum). If I can find 3 people who were more hesitant to DK ghug and don't fit your scum narrative then perhaps your reason for scumreading worcej is poor.worcej wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:17 pmThis was me disagreeing with celaph's opinion on ghug and pointing out the flaw in his (celaph's) logic to not flip ghug.worcej wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:46 amThat was D1 that, we are now on D2 and he expressed similar laziness. That's the beef I have with it.celaph wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:12 amI don't think that ghug makes for a good kill today.
Rereading town PR ghug from last game I felt that much of his play now aligns with his play this game. He was very open that his D1 vote last game was more for someone he didn't want to play with than for someone who was particularly scummy. He
said as much.
Also of note: celaph is in the 'suspect for trying to protect ghug' group.
So... how did I not push for his DK exactly?
To be clear, I think aaro is the least suspicious person on this list by far. I have to cherry pick because he revised his view on ghug as scumlean and ultimately voted for him. To be fair to myself, I also started liking the idea of the ghug wagon, but I didn't push for his death nor did I vote for him. And I think worcej pushed for ghug's death more than both of us. The Durga/Flum spot on the other hand needed no cherry picking.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Ernst_Brenner