M62: PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF REVOLUTIONARY MAFIA GAME THREAD!

[aarodactyl]

Ouch

Yeah, I fully expect to be on your next scum list.

Is this because you think I'm the irrational sort who would scumread someone for insulting me, or because you suspect that I already scumread you and want to paint it as such?

I'm just trying to be funny. Also, I didn't mean anything as an insult. I just forgot who I was talking about the rules with and forgot to double check before posting.

[BunnyGo]

##Call GM: Can you confirm my interpretation of the Jailer role?

In this situation specifically:
- Jailer targets Anyone
- RB'er targets Jailer

Result is the jailer's target is still jailed and the jailer is still roleblocked, but after their action completed.

The OP erroneously suggests that Roleblockers cannot Cancel Jailers in any circumstance. The intended resolution—which, if either of these roles is in the game, has been followed thus far—is that Roleblockers can Cancel Jailers. The OP correctly indicates that Jailers trump Roleblockers when they target each other or a mutual target but incorrectly implied that a Jailer “goes first” in a manner that renders it immune to the Roleblocker completely.

Apologies for the error.

For once worcej and I are not the same because i already asked the GM this in PM.

[BunnyGo]

By the way, if aaro is scum here, he’s doing great.

[Durga]

Agh but bunny why would you lie? It doesn't make sense.

[aarodactyl]

Agh but bunny why would you lie? It doesn't make sense.

He's getting old and is easily confused.

[worcej]

##Call GM: Can you confirm my interpretation of the Jailer role?

In this situation specifically:
- Jailer targets Anyone
- RB'er targets Jailer

Result is the jailer's target is still jailed and the jailer is still roleblocked, but after their action completed.

The OP erroneously suggests that Roleblockers cannot Cancel Jailers in any circumstance. The intended resolution—which, if either of these roles is in the game, has been followed thus far—is that Roleblockers can Cancel Jailers. The OP correctly indicates that Jailers trump Roleblockers when they target each other or a mutual target but incorrectly implied that a Jailer “goes first” in a manner that renders it immune to the Roleblocker completely.

Apologies for the error.

Okay, so Bunny cannot be confirmed outside of flipping him.

[BunnyGo]

Agh but bunny why would you lie? It doesn't make sense.

All I knew was what Ghug said. And he said I had to answer fast. This was both weird and off putting. So to not out myself, I did this. Was it smart? Maybe not. Would it have helped in other circumstances I was being paranoid about? Maybe. I didn’t really want to claim my role and get ded.

[BunnyGo]

Question: what does Durga have on Jamie? Is in incontrovertible? Has she said yet? I haven’t seen.

[worcej]

##Call GM: Can you confirm my interpretation of the Jailer role?

In this situation specifically:
- Jailer targets Anyone
- RB'er targets Jailer

Result is the jailer's target is still jailed and the jailer is still roleblocked, but after their action completed.

The OP erroneously suggests that Roleblockers cannot Cancel Jailers in any circumstance. The intended resolution—which, if either of these roles is in the game, has been followed thus far—is that Roleblockers can Cancel Jailers. The OP correctly indicates that Jailers trump Roleblockers when they target each other or a mutual target but incorrectly implied that a Jailer “goes first” in a manner that renders it immune to the Roleblocker completely.

Apologies for the error.

For once worcej and I are not the same because i already asked the GM this in PM.

I like how the underline is broken lol.

Yeah, that makes sense that town!bunny would do this, but we still cannot confirm you any other way of flipping you.

[Tom Bombadil]

I understand the Jamie and Bunny wagons via Durga's tracking.

Whats the cliffnotes on Yoyo as I'm catching my way up through the thread?

[BunnyGo]

I understand the Jamie and Bunny wagons via Durga's tracking.

Whats the cliffnotes on Yoyo as I'm catching my way up through the thread?

Don’t ask.

[BunnyGo]

I understand the Jamie and Bunny wagons via Durga's tracking.

Whats the cliffnotes on Yoyo as I'm catching my way up through the thread?

Don’t ask.

I’m not being snarky. That’s really the answer.

[aarodactyl]

Question: what does Durga have on Jamie? Is in incontrovertible? Has she said yet? I haven’t seen.

Jamie visited neph N2.

[Tom Bombadil]

I understand the Jamie and Bunny wagons via Durga's tracking.

Whats the cliffnotes on Yoyo as I'm catching my way up through the thread?

Don’t ask.

I’m not being snarky. That’s really the answer.

Tremendous.

[Durga]

Yoyo just doesn't participate Tom

[Hellenic Riot]

So, time for some mathematics that doesn't involve horrendous levels of probability

We're going to spend 2 days on removing Bunny (rest of D3 + N3)
Then 3 days removing confscum Jamie (D4+N4)
Then potentially another 3 days removing confscum emc (D5+N5)

This means that it's going to take somewhere between 5 and 8 days before we actually start playing the game again properly, which is some real momentum/interest-destroying stuff


##Call GM
How many people have to agree with the proposal to get the hammer reinstated

[BunnyGo]

The OP erroneously suggests that Roleblockers cannot Cancel Jailers in any circumstance. The intended resolution—which, if either of these roles is in the game, has been followed thus far—is that Roleblockers can Cancel Jailers. The OP correctly indicates that Jailers trump Roleblockers when they target each other or a mutual target but incorrectly implied that a Jailer “goes first” in a manner that renders it immune to the Roleblocker completely.

Apologies for the error.

For once worcej and I are not the same because i already asked the GM this in PM.

I like how the underline is broken lol.

Yeah, that makes sense that town!bunny would do this, but we still cannot confirm you any other way of flipping you.

Yeah...I’m realizing that. Which is part of why I’m not kicking so hard. It would also be true no matter what I’d said as my actions the first two nights...so I don’t see how that cost us anyways.

I also don’t see why we don’t do Jamie first. From your POV either I’m jailer or scum. If scum, you’ll get me eventually. If jailer, scum won’t kill me because they know you’ll do it at some point. But in the meantime they have to waste a RB or otherwise try and outguess me. We’ll also get intel from Jamie’s flip. If he is scum power, then I’m slightly more clear. If he’s scum RBer, then even better.

[BunnyGo]

Question: what does Durga have on Jamie? Is in incontrovertible? Has she said yet? I haven’t seen.

Jamie visited neph N2.

Ah. And since only remaining roles are protective or scum, he must be scum.

[Balki Bartokomous]

##vote Bunnygo

(doesn't appear there is any way to test him if RB can block Jailer)

[Tom Bombadil]

So what we are trying to sort is whether Bunny smuggled emc D1, or jailed emc D1 - correct?