M62: PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF REVOLUTIONARY MAFIA GAME THREAD!

[brainbomb]

If he didnt, then great no pr is outed
if he did, great we got two scum in 25 min and now its 4 left and were on a sweet roll

Sure.

I just found it really odd that you immediately leapt to the conclusion that Neph had caught Hamilton, and yet at the same time, apparently having decided this, you threw your vote onto someone who was not Hamilton.

theres no end hammers. so we may as well play how we would have in the event its nothing

[Jamiet99uk]

ive been nothing but respectful to you jamie, so talking about me like im mentally ill is fucked up

There there, calm down. It's nothing personal. Look at how I've been treating Bozo.

[President Eden]

I've received a few private messages about a mechanic I failed to clarify in the OP. Apologies for the confusion.

To the extent that Jailers, Roleblockers, and Smugglers may or may not be in the game, players would ONLY have been notified that they were disrupted by these roles if they submitted actions disrupted by these roles. If the target of these roles either does not have a night action, or does not submit one, then the target isn't informed of a roleblock/etc.

Night 1 was adjudicated according to the above principles, and future nights will likewise be adjudicated in the same way.

I realize this is non-standard and it should have been made clear in the OP. I apologize again for the confusion.

[Jamiet99uk]

Ah ok thanks GM, that's interesting. Not the standard adjudication, so worth clarifying.

I guess it's meaningless for anyone to declare "I was not roleblocked" because a VT would not even learn this.... but also if you think you were roleblocked, please don't say, because you'd effectively be outing the fact that you had a night action.

[ghug]

Oh lmao, poor teacon, all that work to just be sniped. Have fun in god thread.

I don't think scum says this about a dead teammate.

[aarodactyl]

Agree that its honest, it makes me uncomfortable though

A lot of excuses why theres no content from them but no attempt to even generate town reads,

Very low effort play at best

I included two town reads (flum and nd) in another post around the same time. Bunny knows me in real life and most of his reactions to my posts seem to be him confused my initial shit posting.

Sorry I haven’t been posting much. I just caught up on everything and didn’t realize EOD was so close. I’m going to switch to

##vote ND

My reason behind this is that the initial fighting seemed like a way to clog up discussion. And everything after that has seemed like a way to get attention off themselves. Also I’d be lying if I didn’t say that their posts have also been too abrasive for me, so I won’t be too sad if I’m wrong with the read.

I find this switch by aarodactyl from saying ND was one of his 2 town reads when questioned by Nephthys to voting for ND suspicious.

That’s fair. I just got more and more annoyed at ND as the game went on. Also I think I townread ND before their long post about how they were annoying on purpose to get reactions. That made me think twice about my town read

[ghug]

while thats true, I was also first to scumread teacon. I pointed out his play was shadowing the thread talk about liqour. I stated he looked like he was trying just to fit in and I listed teacon as scum unprompted. I fought very hard to save his life later yea. And for that I absolutely look like a partner trying to save him

This is a scumbrain post.

[ghug]

Lmao what a night

Also, give me a sec but I'm pretty sure we got another one from it

We got Teacon, the GM said so.

Jamie, why did you make this post?

[Durga]

I've received a few private messages about a mechanic I failed to clarify in the OP. Apologies for the confusion.

To the extent that Jailers, Roleblockers, and Smugglers may or may not be in the game, players would ONLY have been notified that they were disrupted by these roles if they submitted actions disrupted by these roles. If the target of these roles either does not have a night action, or does not submit one, then the target isn't informed of a roleblock/etc.

Night 1 was adjudicated according to the above principles, and future nights will likewise be adjudicated in the same way.

I realize this is non-standard and it should have been made clear in the OP. I apologize again for the confusion.

This means the roleblock knows who would be PR or not PR.

So we should not claim roleblock ever? I think

[Balki Bartokomous]

- Balki changes from HB to teacon right at the death (3/5/6)
...
Thoughts:
- Balki continually wasting his vote but then parking on teacon at the last second when it was too late looks much worse in retrospect

@HR, analyze my vote more please.

[Durga]

Oh lmao, poor teacon, all that work to just be sniped. Have fun in god thread.

I don't think scum says this about a dead teammate.

I don't think you can make that assumption and I don't think that's necessarily true

[Bonatogether]

Rereading teacon's post at EoN, now that we know he was a goon. Props to the vig.

"This [discussions of tone] is why I liked the bozo argument re: bo_jamiet, because it's entirely based on meta and the odds. Barring slips, or hard evidence, that's all you really have to work with on d1. c'est la vie."
I don't think this changes anything with regards to Jamie - I could see this either way.

"VCA looks mostly unhelpful so far. I can't see the whole thing in the bot's history, but on reading through it looks like lot of 2-off wagons, that eventaully consolidated onto Maniac, ND, and me."
I believe this is the set up for a push to ignore any VCA (I looked it up in peterbot so don't pull a celaph on me for knowing it), but he's rather unexpectedly been shot. If anyone tries to use this logic I think they're pretty scum.

His thoughts on the wagons seems to be the most interesting bit of the whole post.

On Maniac he says:
-brain NAI for starting it
-celaph and rdr sus for using post 1780, page 89 to vote, even if he agrees with their reasoning
-ND (from the dead) thinks teacon is town
-damo is scum for voting

I think this makes brain look a little scummier, and damo look pretty good (he earlier voted for teacon). I'm not sure what it says about celaph yet. Interesting that he tries to claim that ND thought that he was legit. Did ND ever actually do anything to indicate this?

On ND:
-durga and kgray NAI for starting
-ghug sus for saying that he's voting ND for durga but staying on after durga left
-kgray, aarodactyl, and jamie's votes consistent
-brain's vote sus for it being late
-says HB is a lame scum

Interesting point about ghug, although I think ghug was joking and forgot. Possibly an attempt to put a bit of shade on him. I don't know why he says that kgray starts and hops on, but imo it's an attempt to look less polished to seem more town. I agree about Brain's vote, but I don't know why he doesn't call out kgray and Hamilton for voting at almost the exact same time. I don't know what to make of his HB comment.

On himself:
-straight out of the gate hedges by saying that he might not be able to separate any omgusing from what's actually going
-says good on Flum for voting for his scumread, although he "miss[ed] where he thought I was scummier than ND"
-bunny votes late and w/o explanation
-Balki/Chaqa/Vash are "late and lazy"
-HR is only voting him for personal reasons

He could just say that everyone voting him is stupid and doesn't have a good reason and save a whole paragraph.

He then says that he was a flashwagon that Jamie started. This is another attempt to get himself not voted d2 on the grounds that his d1 scare was a fluke.

He finishes by saying that maniac is a scum who just got saved, and posits that people went onto ND at the last second because they were scared that he would be the one to get voted. I find this interesting because, aside from the bit about himself getting voted, it's largely true that ND got voted for his personality.

His question - "Did you get buddied?" is a straight attempt to look town. Nothing more, although it is a solid question to ask.

And @bb, I'd be interested to see post 3/3.

[ghug]

He has not said any such thing. What is your obsession with trying to expose PRs?

he said he GOT another one Jamie.
what does that mean?
use your imagination, you play DND. Cmon

I'm pretty sure he just means this makes Hamilton fairly sus. Why are you trying to PR out constantly?

I read it as brain did, FWIW, and I don't think it's unreasonable to speculate on an imminent claim. It's now clearly not a claim, so brain should move on.

[ghug]

Do we have claims for jailed/rb'd?

Whoa you read the setup?

[Durga]

he said he GOT another one Jamie.
what does that mean?
use your imagination, you play DND. Cmon

I'm pretty sure he just means this makes Hamilton fairly sus. Why are you trying to PR out constantly?

I read it as brain did, FWIW, and I don't think it's unreasonable to speculate on an imminent claim. It's now clearly not a claim, so brain should move on.

It's not just this. He did it with Bunny? As well.

[Durga]

Do we have claims for jailed/rb'd?

Whoa you read the setup?

Yeee, I wanted to see how teacon died

[ghug]

Oh lmao, poor teacon, all that work to just be sniped. Have fun in god thread.

I don't think scum says this about a dead teammate.

I don't think you can make that assumption and I don't think that's necessarily true

What is the difference between what you're saying before the "and" and what you're saying after the "and"?

[Durga]

I don't think scum says this about a dead teammate.

I don't think you can make that assumption and I don't think that's necessarily true

What is the difference between what you're saying before the "and" and what you're saying after the "and"?

Don't be irritating with me I'm not gonna entertain it

[Jamiet99uk]

Lmao what a night

Also, give me a sec but I'm pretty sure we got another one from it

We got Teacon, the GM said so.

Jamie, why did you make this post?

Sarcastic lulz obv

[ghug]

I'm pretty sure he just means this makes Hamilton fairly sus. Why are you trying to PR out constantly?

I read it as brain did, FWIW, and I don't think it's unreasonable to speculate on an imminent claim. It's now clearly not a claim, so brain should move on.

It's not just this. He did it with Bunny? As well.

Yeah, I have no defense for that one.