Vecna wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:12 pmok, the game is ruined again nowghug wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:48 pmThe Jamie attemptsJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:34 pm
That's very interesting.
My PM was the exact same PM as was sent to a number of other people at the same time, and it contained a line which made this explicitly clear.
You do receive some interesting correspondence, Maniac.
An awkward townslip. Alas
Nobody buys it
ghug literally scumslipped. jamiet used the bcc shit to townclear him
%%call gm can you confirm whether scum received that exact same PM? Because else you can restart the game and not fuck that shit up
1) maniac: If maniac had read the PM (and/or the setup), he would know that it wasn't a role PM. If he hadn't, he wouldn't know what to call it, and fall back on the default term "role pm". Since Maniac just got elected to parliament, I'm guessing he didn't have time to read either of these.
2) jamie: Jamie sees it as a slip because D1 shennanigans and ridiculous scrutiny is pretty consistient with jamie.
3) alchohol-ghug calls jamie's nitpicking an artificial townslip. Seems consistent with the rest of his antagonistic tone in that time block. If scum had their pm's sent directly (not bcc'd), they might not be aware that the town-pm was bcc'd, hence this is only a slip from ghug if scum didn't get the messages bcc'd, AND ghug was really drunk enough to talk about alignment indicative mechanics that early. @scum - Can any of you confirm whether your pm's were bcc'd or sent directly?
4) Talking about PM's: not my idea of solvey (or enjoyable) play. But I don't think we need to restart unless GM's say so.