MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#861 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:00 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:02 pm
Damo, are you tracking the order in which people complied with the statement?
No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
I had to look up "prevaricated." New vocab.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#862 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:02 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:37 pm
Vecna wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:28 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:18 pm


What a stupid question.
what a weird interaction
What is wierd is Bo asking me if bozo had answered my question while quoting Bozo's reply thus making the question redundant. Hence my reply.
The obviously sarcastic response that you're too dense to pick up on was that you claimed you asked bozo a stupid question to try and somehow indicate to him that the point he was making was not worth pursuing, but he didn't pick up on that and answered your question as if it were completely serious. So I asked you if he answered your question, because he did, in fact, answer your question even though you said you didn't want him to continue down that road.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#863 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:04 pm

Vecna wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:39 pm
summit_fever wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:40 pm
bo_sox48 wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:44 pm


The issue I take with that is that it sets up such easy meta for worcej to follow. I don't think anyone legitimately sticks to the exact same meta that we claim to have on them as town or scum every single game; in fact, I can think of very few people who obviously indicate one way or another unintentionally.

What game was super nice worcej? I'm pretty sure he's always nice to me, but that's just because I've made him my minion. He thinks of me what I want him to think of me.
Bo failed to respond to Fox's second paragraph where Fox misremembered Ghug as scum in M57 (which would have been alongside Bo and Fox, who were both scum). Not sure if scum!bo would be so willing to ignore that.
And summit appears again with one comment that is super super specific. I dont even understand the point he's trying to make, but it does show he's reading super carefully I guess, and is being very specific about the things he's responding to.

Summit, why is your free-posting so much lower than it used to be?
This I like

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#864 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:04 pm

Vecna wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:45 pm
Hellenic Riot wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:44 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:31 pm
My top town reads are damo, Yoyoyozo, BunnyGo, Foxcastle, and TrPrado. That leaves Bismarck among the current vote leaders, and he has said very little to go on. I am not sure about Durga, I find her suspicious, but when she is scum she typically does a good job at not looking suspicious.

I am going to vote for Bismarck for now because his unexplained vote for damo was somewhat suspicious.

##VOTE Bismarck
I'd love to hear a reason for why you townread TrPrado
Also, why not go further with the critique on this post HR? It feels like youre going easy on this terrible post.

In fact, im surprised not more people are not at all scrutinizing bozo, just because "he was nitty on a few small things".

I actually dont know if I even agree with him being nitpicky so far.
What makes it terrible, do you disagree with my town reads? It seems to me you are deflecting from the fact that you voted to kill an obviously town BunnyGo.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#865 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:07 pm

summit_fever wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:53 pm
Vecna wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:39 pm
summit_fever wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:40 pm


Bo failed to respond to Fox's second paragraph where Fox misremembered Ghug as scum in M57 (which would have been alongside Bo and Fox, who were both scum). Not sure if scum!bo would be so willing to ignore that.
And summit appears again with one comment that is super super specific. I dont even understand the point he's trying to make, but it does show he's reading super carefully I guess, and is being very specific about the things he's responding to.

Summit, why is your free-posting so much lower than it used to be?
The point is Ghug being mislabelled as scum in M57 by Foxcastle must have been noticed by Bo, yet he chose to ignore it. I think that is worth pointing out.

I'm not sure my posting is too much different, except I had to place the game aside for a time.
This I like as well. Summit is absolved of all guilt. (Not really. I'm so funny.)

Fwiw, I don't remember games by number. Apparently this is M58, and M57 was the last game that should have been thrown out. I remember games by what happened in them, or perhaps by theme if it was a good one.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#866 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:08 pm

Durga wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 3:51 pm
How did yoyo literally do nothing but shade me d1 and then just disappear. I hate it.
p much

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#867 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:11 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:54 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:18 pm
Who here thinks Seth looks scummy?
His vote pattern is scummy only if Bismarck/encmc is also scum. If Bisemc is town there is no reason for a newbies cum to attrack so much attention changinge his vote at that time.

Also, his explanations at night doesn´t look coached, so I would say I put him more on the towny side of my reads.
The fact that you haven't seen someone playing recently on this site doesn't mean they're dumb and in need of coaching

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#868 Post by rdrivera2005 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:17 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:11 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:54 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:18 pm
Who here thinks Seth looks scummy?
His vote pattern is scummy only if Bismarck/encmc is also scum. If Bisemc is town there is no reason for a newbies cum to attrack so much attention changinge his vote at that time.

Also, his explanations at night doesn´t look coached, so I would say I put him more on the towny side of my reads.
The fact that you haven't seen someone playing recently on this site doesn't mean they're dumb and in need of coaching
True. But the fact he keep explaining himself at night is towny to me. Any vet player would have told him to let it go at night and only start defending himself if it turn into votes on next day.
Laying low is the recipe to win on Webdip Mafia...

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#869 Post by rdrivera2005 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:18 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:17 pm
bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:11 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:54 pm


His vote pattern is scummy only if Bismarck/encmc is also scum. If Bisemc is town there is no reason for a newbies cum to attrack so much attention changinge his vote at that time.

Also, his explanations at night doesn´t look coached, so I would say I put him more on the towny side of my reads.
The fact that you haven't seen someone playing recently on this site doesn't mean they're dumb and in need of coaching
True. But the fact he keep explaining himself at night is towny to me. Any vet player would have told him to let it go at night and only start defending himself if it turn into votes on next day.
Laying low is the recipe to win on Webdip Mafia...
It missed an "as".

Laying low is the recipe to win on Webdip as Mafia...

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#870 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:21 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:17 pm
bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:11 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:54 pm


His vote pattern is scummy only if Bismarck/encmc is also scum. If Bisemc is town there is no reason for a newbies cum to attrack so much attention changinge his vote at that time.

Also, his explanations at night doesn´t look coached, so I would say I put him more on the towny side of my reads.
The fact that you haven't seen someone playing recently on this site doesn't mean they're dumb and in need of coaching
True. But the fact he keep explaining himself at night is towny to me. Any vet player would have told him to let it go at night and only start defending himself if it turn into votes on next day.
Laying low is the recipe to win on Webdip Mafia...
Not sure I agree with the philosophy but for this case in particular you're probably right

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#871 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:02 pm
Damo, are you tracking the order in which people complied with the statement?
No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#872 Post by rdrivera2005 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:34 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:02 pm
Damo, are you tracking the order in which people complied with the statement?
No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?
Interesting that this word have a complete distinct meaning on Portuguese.

TrPrado
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1904
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:22 pm
Location: OOOOOOKLAHOMA WHERE THE WIND COMES SWEEPING DOWN THE PLAIN
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#873 Post by TrPrado » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:35 pm

Did summit ignore me again?

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#874 Post by Durga » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:35 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:02 pm
Damo, are you tracking the order in which people complied with the statement?
No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?
I did no such thing.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#875 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:36 pm

Durga wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:35 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm


No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?
I did no such thing.
Thanks, Damo.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#876 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:37 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:00 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:02 pm
Damo, are you tracking the order in which people complied with the statement?
No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
I had to look up "prevaricated." New vocab.
Do you think Damo was using it correctly?

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#877 Post by Durga » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:37 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:36 pm
Durga wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:35 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm


What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?
I did no such thing.
Thanks, Damo.
He can still explain what he meant.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#878 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:37 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:34 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:28 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm


No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
What do you mean prevaricated? They left ambiguity?
Interesting that this word have a complete distinct meaning on Portuguese.
What's the Portuguese meaning?

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#879 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:39 pm

Is someone currently tracking the hypo-claims? (If so, there's no need to repost them, I'm only interested in the number that have been made.) Are enough people doing that, or are we dropping the idea?

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA LVIII (58) - WITCHFINDER GENERAL - GAME THREAD

#880 Post by bo_sox48 » Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:40 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:37 pm
bo_sox48 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:00 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm


No, but everyone has now complied (of sorts).

Bo and Durga prevaricated the most.
I had to look up "prevaricated." New vocab.
Do you think Damo was using it correctly?
According to my dictionary definition, he was using it in the way I presume he intended. That doesn't mean he was right. Is that what you're trying to ask me?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat