Mini-Mafia M1014

[ghug]

You're still not commenting on gold's reaction to my vote.

[Yoyoyozo]

Oh there’s already a train on bozo and I’m perfectly fine with him as well. But I’m definitely not liking rdr defense of lurkers. In fact with a game of only 2 mafia it makes sense for even both of them to lay low. I’m at work and can’t actually pressure rdr for now so I’ll do ##vote bozo

[Durga]

You're still not commenting on gold's reaction to my vote.

Me? I'm not sure how to read it. I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.

Also, yoyo your push on "any lurker is ok with me" feels hella lazy

[rdrivera2005]

Did you just quote yourself immediately after posting that and say nothing? I spit out my coffee because while I’m reading the posts I like to pretend to be the person posting and I’ll reading it two ways, once as town and once as scum. And I imagined scum gold quaking under pressure and doing weird ditsy shit like that.

More likely than not just a simple mistake but I still found it funny. That being said I’m gonna ##vote damos because he’s been useless all game and I don’t have like any confidence in my reads so far, and would rather not let it get to lylo with a useless town. As scummy as I think some people are being, I think mafia will narrow down the talkers for us we don’t need to make that call so early, which I think was towns mistake last game. Right now we should be setting up for a smooth end game and people like bozo rd and damos even if they are town need to step it up.

I am here, I am stating my opinion (and so do Bozo). Why you insist on pushing this kind of policy lynch? Why you don't push your scum reads?

Because policy flipping lurkers gets them talking. I’ll push my scum reads when it makes sense to do so. Right now I want to make it abundantly clear that lurking is worse than acting a little shady on D1. No free lunches on my watch.

Another point: killing a talker on D1 risky. It’s detrimental if they flip town, especially since this is a smaller game. Secondly, it’s what happened last game, the last thing town needs is for the remaining talkers to all be scum and a bunch of lurker shady townies that do nothing and contribute nothing. When the mafia flips a leading town tonight it’ll narrow things down for us tomorrow. It’s like that one brain teaser where behind 3 doors there is either nothing, or is a new car behind one door.

you choose a door and then one of the doors with nothing behind is opened. Mathematically speaking you should always switch doors if given the opportunity because your chances go from 1 in 3 to 1 in 2 if you do.

While I find Durga kinda scummy I don’t think the risk of flipping her D1 outweighs my confidence (or lack thereof) in fact there might not even be scum among the group of talkers. Right now the lurkers seem the scummiest. Coming out of the woodwork to “stating my opinion” only when several people begin to support the idea of a lurker policy vote. ##vote rdr

This is so convoluted that I don't really understand your point.

The door thing is right but what it have to do with lynching a lurker?

"The lurkers seems the scummiest". Great, so you are voting on your scum read. So, care to explain why I am scummy?

[Yoyoyozo]

You're still not commenting on gold's reaction to my vote.

Me? I'm not sure how to read it. I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.

Also, yoyo your push on "any lurker is ok with me" feels hella lazy

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

[ghug]

You're still not commenting on gold's reaction to my vote.

Me? I'm not sure how to read it. I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.

Also, yoyo your push on "any lurker is ok with me" feels hella lazy

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

[Yoyoyozo]

I am here, I am stating my opinion (and so do Bozo). Why you insist on pushing this kind of policy lynch? Why you don't push your scum reads?

Because policy flipping lurkers gets them talking. I’ll push my scum reads when it makes sense to do so. Right now I want to make it abundantly clear that lurking is worse than acting a little shady on D1. No free lunches on my watch.

Another point: killing a talker on D1 risky. It’s detrimental if they flip town, especially since this is a smaller game. Secondly, it’s what happened last game, the last thing town needs is for the remaining talkers to all be scum and a bunch of lurker shady townies that do nothing and contribute nothing. When the mafia flips a leading town tonight it’ll narrow things down for us tomorrow. It’s like that one brain teaser where behind 3 doors there is either nothing, or is a new car behind one door.

you choose a door and then one of the doors with nothing behind is opened. Mathematically speaking you should always switch doors if given the opportunity because your chances go from 1 in 3 to 1 in 2 if you do.

While I find Durga kinda scummy I don’t think the risk of flipping her D1 outweighs my confidence (or lack thereof) in fact there might not even be scum among the group of talkers. Right now the lurkers seem the scummiest. Coming out of the woodwork to “stating my opinion” only when several people begin to support the idea of a lurker policy vote. ##vote rdr

This is so convoluted that I don't really understand your point.

The door thing is right but what it have to do with lynching a lurker?

"The lurkers seems the scummiest". Great, so you are voting on your scum read. So, care to explain why I am scummy?

Did you read what I said? I don’t think I could explain it any more clearly.

[ghug]

I think he's saying that the more active town are the doors that will be opened for us.

[rdrivera2005]

Oh there’s already a train on bozo and I’m perfectly fine with him as well. But I’m definitely not liking rdr defense of lurkers. In fact with a game of only 2 mafia it makes sense for even both of them to lay low. I’m at work and can’t actually pressure rdr for now so I’ll do ##vote bozo

I am not defending lurkers. In fact Bozo have posted more then Moscow and HB and same as Gold, but this is not my point.

What I am calling is that calling the lower posters as lurkers is lazy and scummy. I have posted more content then many other players. I have answered the questions directed to me. The only player that can be called lurker is Damo.

[Yoyoyozo]

Me? I'm not sure how to read it. I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.

Also, yoyo your push on "any lurker is ok with me" feels hella lazy

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

That’s why I waited until today to suggest it. Firstly because we still get info from who was willing to vote for whom, secondly to see who would scramble to make actual contributive conversation. Lastly because it’s just a good idea

[rdrivera2005]

Me? I'm not sure how to read it. I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.

Also, yoyo your push on "any lurker is ok with me" feels hella lazy

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

[rdrivera2005]

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

That’s why I waited until today to suggest it. Firstly because we still get info from who was willing to vote for whom, secondly to see who would scramble to make actual contributive conversation. Lastly because it’s just a good idea

And you still didn't answer why I am scummy.

[Yoyoyozo]

Oh there’s already a train on bozo and I’m perfectly fine with him as well. But I’m definitely not liking rdr defense of lurkers. In fact with a game of only 2 mafia it makes sense for even both of them to lay low. I’m at work and can’t actually pressure rdr for now so I’ll do ##vote bozo

I am not defending lurkers. In fact Bozo have posted more then Moscow and HB and same as Gold, but this is not my point.

What I am calling is that calling the lower posters as lurkers is lazy and scummy. I have posted more content then many other players. I have answered the questions directed to me. The only player that can be called lurker is Damo.

Half of bozos posts is saying “yes”, doing color tests, and fucking around. As for you, you’re only became really active the past few hours. You’re both lurkers in my eyes

[ghug]

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

Is bozo not still absolute garbage at this game? I haven't seen any evidence that that's changed.

[Yoyoyozo]

I’m not saying any lurker is okay, I’m saying any lurker is better than a shot in the dark. Realistically we’re not getting scum d1, so I’m saying let’s just off the weakest link and the benefit of that is that it’s probably just as likely we hit scum because of how I imagine the meta game of scum this game looks like “lay low D1 until my partner and I can come up with a plan during N1” if we don’t get scum then we got rid of a pretty damning liability for the end game.

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

[ghug]

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

Does this make you less inclined to vote bozo?

[rdrivera2005]

I buy the "off the weakest link" logic, but it becomes less informative to look back on if that's all that's justifying people's votes.

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

No, I don't know and I think he is likely scum and I am voting him. Are you reading the thread?

[Yoyoyozo]

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

Does this make you less inclined to vote bozo?

If I had my way, I’d be on Rd but I only have 15 more minutes in my break. I’ll make them count though.

[Yoyoyozo]

If anyone think me or Bozo is a weaker link then Yoyo he is delusional (if all of us are town, which I highly doubt).

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

No, I don't know and I think he is likely scum and I am voting him. Are you reading the thread?

If you think he is likely scum, why are I a weaker link? Lmao

[ghug]

This hard defense of bozo seems like you’re setting up an “I told you so” moment if bozo flips town. Do you know with certainty bozos alignment?

No, I don't know and I think he is likely scum and I am voting him. Are you reading the thread?

If you think he is likely scum, why are I a weaker link? Lmao

Because we're talking about your suggestion to eliminate useless people rather than high error bar scumreads?