No. It was deliberate.
Mafia 57 Matrix
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Let me try to approach this from view where I don't scumread you and will get back to you on that.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:54 pmEMC, since you are here, have you read my case on HR?
What do you think of it?
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Much congratulations to Bungo, winning as 3P with those near-ridiculous requirements.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
If you're town, you need to start solving the game so that we can see you're town, OK?e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:12 pmLet me try to approach this from view where I don't scumread you and will get back to you on that.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:54 pmEMC, since you are here, have you read my case on HR?
What do you think of it?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Well, GG Bunny.
Nanook, let's hear these scum reads from you before you're gone as well.
Nanook, let's hear these scum reads from you before you're gone as well.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I don’t think this is that hard to fake and/or play up?ghug wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:02 pmWould scrum actually manufacture this level of cluelessness?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:00 pmToo many. I feel like the case jamie has lined up around HR is solid. It's the proper thing for me to do to follow HR and see if I get the same vibe.
When I could catch a signal I didn't feel like I had the time to go back to the game setup to factcheck all the roles/blocks.
Bunny, you do seem pretty consigned to your fate?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I put them in thread already dudegoldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:17 pmWell, GG Bunny.
Nanook, let's hear these scum reads from you before you're gone as well.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
It's so over the top though. I feel like scum would do it in a way that draws less blatant attention.Nanook wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:18 pmI don’t think this is that hard to fake and/or play up?ghug wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:02 pmWould scrum actually manufacture this level of cluelessness?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:00 pm
Too many. I feel like the case jamie has lined up around HR is solid. It's the proper thing for me to do to follow HR and see if I get the same vibe.
When I could catch a signal I didn't feel like I had the time to go back to the game setup to factcheck all the roles/blocks.
Bunny, you do seem pretty consigned to your fate?
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
He’s fairly inexperienced though yeah? Might not have that deft of a touch
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Fwiw Goldie was in the PT about the same time as those time stamps.
Idk how meaningful it is unless Goldie is a super careless scum
Idk how meaningful it is unless Goldie is a super careless scum
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Gold, do you think my assessment of you as the sort of person who would make those posts in the Bunny QT is a fair one?
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
So now that I am back and can actually post decently,
@nanook, what evidence do you have that the following are scum?
Myself (and something beyond the "posting immediately after I posted means they're scum).
Foxcastle?
Bo?
How do you feel about Jamie's work around HR? Think that's a solid enough case to vote for HR Day 6?
@nanook, what evidence do you have that the following are scum?
Myself (and something beyond the "posting immediately after I posted means they're scum).
Foxcastle?
Bo?
How do you feel about Jamie's work around HR? Think that's a solid enough case to vote for HR Day 6?
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Let’s see...
N4 in the QT bo expressed willingness to shoot HB...initial willingness to shoot EMC/HR that was backed off of quickly...hard no for redpilling Jamie followed by willingness to trust his one between EMC/HR read which is kinda weird...defended Tom but no interest in bringing him on board...that’s about it for opinions expressed N4 from Bo.
If he’s scum, looking purely at this I’d say likely partners are in HR/Jamie/Tom
Also he definitely thought I was the virus fwiw, if he didn’t then the way he talked to me at EON4 makes zero sense.
N4 in the QT bo expressed willingness to shoot HB...initial willingness to shoot EMC/HR that was backed off of quickly...hard no for redpilling Jamie followed by willingness to trust his one between EMC/HR read which is kinda weird...defended Tom but no interest in bringing him on board...that’s about it for opinions expressed N4 from Bo.
If he’s scum, looking purely at this I’d say likely partners are in HR/Jamie/Tom
Also he definitely thought I was the virus fwiw, if he didn’t then the way he talked to me at EON4 makes zero sense.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I don’t do big cases, I explicitly believe they’re badHamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:00 pmSo now that I am back and can actually post decently,
@nanook, what evidence do you have that the following are scum?
Myself (and something beyond the "posting immediately after I posted means they're scum).
Foxcastle?
Bo?
How do you feel about Jamie's work around HR? Think that's a solid enough case to vote for HR Day 6?
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Well belief is one thing. I'd do belief as well, but we all know it's not sound. With our numbers being what they are, it's worth some cases. Jamie makes a reasonable one (I'm not reading any holes in it so far but I don't want to lazily just accept it) on HR.Nanook wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:07 pmI don’t do big cases, I explicitly believe they’re badHamilton Brian wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:00 pmSo now that I am back and can actually post decently,
@nanook, what evidence do you have that the following are scum?
Myself (and something beyond the "posting immediately after I posted means they're scum).
Foxcastle?
Bo?
How do you feel about Jamie's work around HR? Think that's a solid enough case to vote for HR Day 6?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, brainbomb, Google [Bot]