Mafia 57 Matrix

[goldfinger0303]

You didn't, but you asked him to explain his vote.

[Foxcastle]

Please look at this:

http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... =emc*&g=57

Here we see Foxcastle repeatedly, over and over, attack people for voting EMC. Oddly on N2 he says "EMC could be scum" but today he is back defending EMC again.

And yet, at the same time, Foxcastle himself is voting Temasek because Temasek is a low poster.

Huh. I feel Ghug may very well be right here.

##VOTE FOXCASTLE

Do you think EMC's play and Tem's play are comparable?

Jamiet, do you think EMC's play and Tem's play are similar levels of participation and engagement?

[BunnyGo]

I think it is really, super weird that BunnyGo said:

" I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC "

And then proceeded to list no cases in which Ghug was Roleblocked.

The four cases were the town/scum options. Then elaborating on how I saw them occurring.

[Jamiet99uk]

Please look at this:

http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... =emc*&g=57

Here we see Foxcastle repeatedly, over and over, attack people for voting EMC. Oddly on N2 he says "EMC could be scum" but today he is back defending EMC again.

And yet, at the same time, Foxcastle himself is voting Temasek because Temasek is a low poster.

Huh. I feel Ghug may very well be right here.

##VOTE FOXCASTLE

Do you think EMC's play and Tem's play are comparable?

Jamiet, do you think EMC's play and Tem's play are similar levels of participation and engagement?

No. Temasek is contributing less. EMC is contributing more scummily.

[BunnyGo]

That's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?

When did I claim Ghug was scum?

That was what my analysis was trying to point out. I saw no cases where ghug could argue with nanook and be scum.

[Jamiet99uk]

That's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?

When did I claim Ghug was scum?

That was what my analysis was trying to point out. I saw no cases where ghug could argue with nanook and be scum.

Yuh-huh. You also instantly assumed he had not been roleblocked.

[BunnyGo]

When did I claim Ghug was scum?

That was what my analysis was trying to point out. I saw no cases where ghug could argue with nanook and be scum.

Yuh-huh. You also instantly assumed he had not been roleblocked.

Nah. I’m just a bad attorney.

[BunnyGo]

That was what my analysis was trying to point out. I saw no cases where ghug could argue with nanook and be scum.

Yuh-huh. You also instantly assumed he had not been roleblocked.

Nah. I’m just a bad solicitor.

Corrected. Or is it supposed to be barrister. I can’t keep it straight.

[ghug]

Hi I was roleblocked last night and while I think it’s weird that you tell people they were roleblocked here I’ll take my townclear please and thank you

##VOTE Nanook

Please explain this vote, Ghug, and explain why you changed your mind?

I was bored

[BunnyGo]

##VOTE Nanook

Please explain this vote, Ghug, and explain why you changed your mind?

I was bored

PMSL

[Jamiet99uk]

##UNVOTE.

[Jamiet99uk]

I am unvoting because Foxcastle's defence of himself against me, this phase, is the towniest thing I've seen him do, and perhaps I was jumping to conclusions about him. Whereas my top townread Ghug has now decided to be a weirdo.

[Jamiet99uk]

How about

##VOTE HELLENIC RIOT

Yes.

[ghug]

I literally provided a link. It provides multiple instances of you criticising anyone who votes EMC.

What do you make of there being much more of that day 1 than day 3?

Fox, same question.

I'm not criticizing people just for voting for EMC. I'm pushing back on policy voting EMC. There's more talk of that early on, and so there is more of me pushing back on it early on. And early on, my view of EMC was more null (including that he could be scum), and now it less null and I think it's more likely that he's town.

Two questions for you, Ghug:

1) Do you agree with Jamiet's characterization of my posts as being "attacks" that occur "over and over" and "repeatedly"?

2) Do you know what Jamiet's case on EMC is? Because I don't see where he has stated it.

1. Largely yes. I'd take your side if you were simply arguing semantics, but you were certainly defending emc, however you want to say that. I did note that you did less defending of him yesterday, which is not something Jamie mentioned. Why do you townread emc?

2. Not off the top of my head. I scumread him for largely PoE reasons.

[BunnyGo]

How about

##VOTE HELLENIC RIOT

Yes.

I like this vote.

[Jamiet99uk]

How about

##VOTE HELLENIC RIOT

Yes.

I like this vote.

You should vote for Hellenic Riot as well, then.

[BunnyGo]

How about

##VOTE HELLENIC RIOT

Yes.

I like this vote.

You should vote for Hellenic Riot as well, then.

##nah. Not yet.

[BunnyGo]

goldfinger0303

goldfinger0303

goldfinger0303

[Hellenic Riot]

How about

##VOTE HELLENIC RIOT

Yes.

So what you're saying is you're going to continue to ignore my riposte from earlier, and further ignore the part where I called you out on ignoring it, and then come back with a totally natural vote on me which is entire coincidental to those things. Excellent stuff.

[Tom Bombadil]

Do you interpret Jamie's actions as scum motivated or just bad town play HR?