Oh well, leniency as he's gotten sick past few days.
Mafia 57 Matrix
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
No it isn't.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pmThat’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pmWhy do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:17 pm
So I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC (is it?) scenario:
1) Both town. Nanook was RBd and Ghug thinks scum are being tricky
2) Nanook is scum. They held RB, and Ghug caught him!
3) Ghug is scum. He KNOWS that Nanook was RBd. Why’s he being weird?
4) Scum theatre. Why bother?
I don’t find case 3 or 4 compelling. But I especially don’t find 3 compelling. The only way 3 works is if Ghug thought someone would do this analysis and wants to next level it for a town read. But the level of thought this game has had would be moronic to try that.
Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.
You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pmNo it isn't.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pmThat’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pm
Why do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?
Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.
You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Then why did you call him a liar?ghug wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:15 pmI have not been roleblocked recently. I do not want to redact Nanook today.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:49 pm@Ghug: Can you be clear about whether you were roleblocked or not?
Do you want a Nanook [redacted] today, since you called him a liar?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
We’re you RBd night 2?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pmThen why did you call him a liar?ghug wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:15 pmI have not been roleblocked recently. I do not want to redact Nanook today.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:49 pm@Ghug: Can you be clear about whether you were roleblocked or not?
Do you want a Nanook [redacted] today, since you called him a liar?
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
You’re correct Jimbo.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:02 pmI didn’t expound upon all ways it could be nanook scum and Ghug town. That’s true.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pmThat’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pm
Why do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
That’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pmAnd Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pmNo it isn't.
Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.
You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Shall I list more where you’re the one RBd? And both of them are scum waiting to CC you?BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pmThat’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pmAnd Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pm
No it isn't.
Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.
You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
The term “recently”Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:08 pmN'o, I wa's'n't.
Why d'o y'ou as'k ?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
There's more scenarios than this, Bunny. Whether we should openly consider them, I'm not sure.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:17 pmSo I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC (is it?) scenario:
1) Both town. Nanook was RBd and Ghug thinks scum are being tricky
2) Nanook is scum. They held RB, and Ghug caught him!
3) Ghug is scum. He KNOWS that Nanook was RBd. Why’s he being weird?
4) Scum theatre. Why bother?
I don’t find case 3 or 4 compelling. But I especially don’t find 3 compelling. The only way 3 works is if Ghug thought someone would do this analysis and wants to next level it for a town read. But the level of thought this game has had would be moronic to try that.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
What?BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pmShall I list more where you’re the one RBd? And both of them are scum waiting to CC you?BunnyGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pmThat’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm
And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.
You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.
What are you on about?
I am not claiming Roleblock.
I have never been Roleblocked in this game.
Nobody has Roleblocked me.
Ghug appeared to be CCing Nanook's RB claim, but has now changed his mind.
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
You simply linked to a peterbot search of every time I mention EMC or when I quote people who mention EMC. First of all, that's not me criticizing anyone who votes EMC, because to do that, you'd have to search for all mentions of EMC first. But the point is that you've mischaracterized it anyway.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:59 pmI literally provided a link. It provides multiple instances of you criticising anyone who votes EMC.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:38 pmAlso, Jamiet, can you please quote where I "attack" anyone? Let alone "over and over" for voting EMC?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 4:20 pmPlease look at this:
http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... =emc*&g=57
Here we see Foxcastle repeatedly, over and over, attack people for voting EMC. Oddly on N2 he says "EMC could be scum" but today he is back defending EMC again.
And yet, at the same time, Foxcastle himself is voting Temasek because Temasek is a low poster.
Huh. I feel Ghug may very well be right here.
##VOTE FOXCASTLE
For example, is that an "attack"?
How does me stating that your and BunnyGo's votes on EMC are NAI constitute an "attack"?Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:57 pmI think BunnyGo and Jamiet's votes on EMC are NAI, even though they're anti-town. If they were scum, it'd be an easy place to park for the Day 1. Since Therul is new, I was kinda assuming that his vote there was more likely to make him town, but I find the inconsistency weird.
That's a reply to BunnyGo. Is this an "attack"?
Can you identify the people who receive "attacks" from me more than once? BunnyGo, I assume, but I laid out my complaints about him at the time. But can you point to anyone else I "attack" "repeatedly?"
(Hint: Jamiet cannot, because this is ridiculous. I'm not sure why he thinks nobody is going to click through and read and see that his characterization is bizarre.)
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I think it is really, super weird that BunnyGo said:
" I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC "
And then proceeded to list no cases in which Ghug was Roleblocked.
" I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC "
And then proceeded to list no cases in which Ghug was Roleblocked.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
Tom, I'm going to answer your question directly in a bit, but this is why you've been dropping in my town reads. Besides Bunny, ghug has probably done the single most scum-hunting in the game. He looks for a lot of reaction tests (which is what I'm reading a lot of his sarcasm as) and while he's not doing vote count analysis, he's doing a lot of behavioral analyzing. I'm not sure how that's been going over your head, but he and Bunny are the two obvtown in this game, in my books.Tom Bombadil wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:42 pmI don’t know. I don’t know who to vote. Nothing you’ve done has seemed towny. I don’t like emc or HR wagons. The Foxcastle push seems a little like low hanging fruit. Nobody has voted you the entire game. Or even suspected you really, which is weird since it’s not like you’ve been obvtowning at all.
(Also, I like the idea of the personal satisfaction of potentially being able to say I was the only one who was onto you)
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I'm not criticizing people just for voting for EMC. I'm pushing back on policy voting EMC. There's more talk of that early on, and so there is more of me pushing back on it early on. And early on, my view of EMC was more null (including that he could be scum), and now it less null and I think it's more likely that he's town.ghug wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:29 pmWhat do you make of there being much more of that day 1 than day 3?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:59 pmI literally provided a link. It provides multiple instances of you criticising anyone who votes EMC.
Fox, same question.
Two questions for you, Ghug:
1) Do you agree with Jamiet's characterization of my posts as being "attacks" that occur "over and over" and "repeatedly"?
2) Do you know what Jamiet's case on EMC is? Because I don't see where he has stated it.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
That's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33938
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
When did I claim Ghug was scum?goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:26 pmThat's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?
- Hellenic Riot
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 57 Matrix
I'm not at all a fan of the way Jamie questioned me about emc but then utterly ignoring my response to him. Why can't you (or anyone else) actually explain why you think emc is mafia?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]