Mafia 57 Matrix

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2501 Post by e.m.c^42 » Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:27 pm

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:16 pm
Jamie is different this game but I haven't a clue whether it's due to his alignment or due to the fact that his period of sobriety is apparently over, lol
Oh well, leniency as he's gotten sick past few days.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2502 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:17 pm


So I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC (is it?) scenario:

1) Both town. Nanook was RBd and Ghug thinks scum are being tricky
2) Nanook is scum. They held RB, and Ghug caught him!
3) Ghug is scum. He KNOWS that Nanook was RBd. Why’s he being weird?
4) Scum theatre. Why bother?

I don’t find case 3 or 4 compelling. But I especially don’t find 3 compelling. The only way 3 works is if Ghug thought someone would do this analysis and wants to next level it for a town read. But the level of thought this game has had would be moronic to try that.
Why do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?
That’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.
No it isn't.

Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.

You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2503 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pm


Why do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?
That’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.
No it isn't.

Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.

You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.

You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2504 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm

ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:15 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:49 pm
@Ghug: Can you be clear about whether you were roleblocked or not?

Do you want a Nanook [redacted] today, since you called him a liar?
I have not been roleblocked recently. I do not want to redact Nanook today.
Then why did you call him a liar?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2505 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:03 pm

ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:08 am
Nanook wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 12:58 am
Hi I was roleblocked last night and while I think it’s weird that you tell people they were roleblocked here I’ll take my townclear please and thank you
##VOTE Nanook
Please explain this vote, Ghug, and explain why you changed your mind?

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2506 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:05 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm
ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:15 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:49 pm
@Ghug: Can you be clear about whether you were roleblocked or not?

Do you want a Nanook [redacted] today, since you called him a liar?
I have not been roleblocked recently. I do not want to redact Nanook today.
Then why did you call him a liar?
We’re you RBd night 2?

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2507 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:06 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:02 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:55 pm


Why do none of your cases provide for the possibility that Ghug was roleblocked?
That’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.
I didn’t expound upon all ways it could be nanook scum and Ghug town. That’s true.
You’re correct Jimbo.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2508 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:08 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:05 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm
ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:15 pm


I have not been roleblocked recently. I do not want to redact Nanook today.
Then why did you call him a liar?
We're you RBd night 2?
N'o, I wa's'n't.

Why d'o y'ou as'k ?

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2509 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:53 pm


That’s built in to the ones where he’s town. I just went based on alignment.
No it isn't.

Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.

You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.

You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
That’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.

And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2510 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:01 pm


No it isn't.

Case 1 says that Nanook was RBed - which means Ghug was not.

You don't lay out a single case in which Ghug was RB'ed, and now you are back-pedalling.
And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.

You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
That’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.

And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.
Shall I list more where you’re the one RBd? And both of them are scum waiting to CC you?

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2511 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:10 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:08 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:05 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm


Then why did you call him a liar?
We're you RBd night 2?
N'o, I wa's'n't.

Why d'o y'ou as'k ?
The term “recently”

goldfinger0303
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2512 Post by goldfinger0303 » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:16 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:17 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:46 pm
##vote ghug
So I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC (is it?) scenario:

1) Both town. Nanook was RBd and Ghug thinks scum are being tricky
2) Nanook is scum. They held RB, and Ghug caught him!
3) Ghug is scum. He KNOWS that Nanook was RBd. Why’s he being weird?
4) Scum theatre. Why bother?

I don’t find case 3 or 4 compelling. But I especially don’t find 3 compelling. The only way 3 works is if Ghug thought someone would do this analysis and wants to next level it for a town read. But the level of thought this game has had would be moronic to try that.
There's more scenarios than this, Bunny. Whether we should openly consider them, I'm not sure.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2513 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:16 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:09 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:02 pm


And Case 2 says the RB was held - which means Ghug was not RBed.

You didn't consider a case where Ghug was actually RBed.
That’s true. I find those cases hard to believe. Like scum!nanook would *know* he’s baiting ghug to a CC when he’s the less trusted.

And with both town, we’d need nanook who claims to be good to arbitrarily be doing something dumb. But you’re correct I didn’t list all ways those 4 cases could occur.
Shall I list more where you’re the one RBd? And both of them are scum waiting to CC you?
What?

What are you on about?

I am not claiming Roleblock.

I have never been Roleblocked in this game.

Nobody has Roleblocked me.

Ghug appeared to be CCing Nanook's RB claim, but has now changed his mind.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2514 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:19 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:59 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:38 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 4:20 pm
Please look at this:

http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?us ... =emc*&g=57

Here we see Foxcastle repeatedly, over and over, attack people for voting EMC. Oddly on N2 he says "EMC could be scum" but today he is back defending EMC again.

And yet, at the same time, Foxcastle himself is voting Temasek because Temasek is a low poster.

Huh. I feel Ghug may very well be right here.

##VOTE FOXCASTLE
Also, Jamiet, can you please quote where I "attack" anyone? Let alone "over and over" for voting EMC?
I literally provided a link. It provides multiple instances of you criticising anyone who votes EMC.
You simply linked to a peterbot search of every time I mention EMC or when I quote people who mention EMC. First of all, that's not me criticizing anyone who votes EMC, because to do that, you'd have to search for all mentions of EMC first. But the point is that you've mischaracterized it anyway.
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:50 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 07, 2020 1:44 pm
##vote emc

shake him into action
I'm all for trying to get EMC to do anything, but it won't work and wagoning him on D1 leads to less information than other players.
For example, is that an "attack"?
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:57 pm
I think BunnyGo and Jamiet's votes on EMC are NAI, even though they're anti-town. If they were scum, it'd be an easy place to park for the Day 1. Since Therul is new, I was kinda assuming that his vote there was more likely to make him town, but I find the inconsistency weird.
How does me stating that your and BunnyGo's votes on EMC are NAI constitute an "attack"?
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:06 pm
Contrast that to EMC, who doesn't care that you're voting him and won't change his behavior.
That's a reply to BunnyGo. Is this an "attack"?

Can you identify the people who receive "attacks" from me more than once? BunnyGo, I assume, but I laid out my complaints about him at the time. But can you point to anyone else I "attack" "repeatedly?"

(Hint: Jamiet cannot, because this is ridiculous. I'm not sure why he thinks nobody is going to click through and read and see that his characterization is bizarre.)

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2515 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:19 pm

I think it is really, super weird that BunnyGo said:

" I see 4 cases with the Nanook/Ghug CC "

And then proceeded to list no cases in which Ghug was Roleblocked.

goldfinger0303
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2516 Post by goldfinger0303 » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:19 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:42 pm
ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:05 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:46 pm
##vote ghug
What's finally pushed you over the edge?
I don’t know. I don’t know who to vote. Nothing you’ve done has seemed towny. I don’t like emc or HR wagons. The Foxcastle push seems a little like low hanging fruit. Nobody has voted you the entire game. Or even suspected you really, which is weird since it’s not like you’ve been obvtowning at all.

(Also, I like the idea of the personal satisfaction of potentially being able to say I was the only one who was onto you)
Tom, I'm going to answer your question directly in a bit, but this is why you've been dropping in my town reads. Besides Bunny, ghug has probably done the single most scum-hunting in the game. He looks for a lot of reaction tests (which is what I'm reading a lot of his sarcasm as) and while he's not doing vote count analysis, he's doing a lot of behavioral analyzing. I'm not sure how that's been going over your head, but he and Bunny are the two obvtown in this game, in my books.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2517 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:24 pm

ghug wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:29 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:59 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:38 pm


Also, Jamiet, can you please quote where I "attack" anyone? Let alone "over and over" for voting EMC?
I literally provided a link. It provides multiple instances of you criticising anyone who votes EMC.
What do you make of there being much more of that day 1 than day 3?

Fox, same question.
I'm not criticizing people just for voting for EMC. I'm pushing back on policy voting EMC. There's more talk of that early on, and so there is more of me pushing back on it early on. And early on, my view of EMC was more null (including that he could be scum), and now it less null and I think it's more likely that he's town.

Two questions for you, Ghug:

1) Do you agree with Jamiet's characterization of my posts as being "attacks" that occur "over and over" and "repeatedly"?

2) Do you know what Jamiet's case on EMC is? Because I don't see where he has stated it.

goldfinger0303
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2518 Post by goldfinger0303 » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:26 pm

That's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2519 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:27 pm

goldfinger0303 wrote:
Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:26 pm
That's a oversight by Bunny, Jamiet, but think about it a bit more. Ghug's move is extremely townie. Think on it a bit more. In what possible scenario would a scum ghug who voted Nanook make sense?
When did I claim Ghug was scum?

User avatar
Hellenic Riot
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2695
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:28 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Mafia 57 Matrix

#2520 Post by Hellenic Riot » Wed Jul 15, 2020 10:30 pm

I'm not at all a fan of the way Jamie questioned me about emc but then utterly ignoring my response to him. Why can't you (or anyone else) actually explain why you think emc is mafia?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Ernst_Brenner