Mafia 56: Scout Camp

[Donny Dude]

Who is it?
I think this is good info to know.

They don't get to know that.

K.

[worcej]

*slow clap @ bozo, rdr, damo, and xorxes*

Good job guys. It totally worked.

##vote bozo

you believe all scum other than macca would have been positive regarding the mass claim?

This was more a point that the mass claim's goal and purpose has failed because one person failed to participate.

We now must speculate what that person was, which gives scum all the advantage of the world and we did not gain a true advantage.

[xorxes]

So the Scoutmaster has a guilty on someone. Probably not reveal who it is until EON.

TRC was definitely not the Scoutmaster at least, or he would not have entered any orders.

[worcej]

Alright, I fulfilled posting requirements. I start vacation tomorrow so I may see you again before EOD.

If not, at least I won't be subbed!

[xorxes]

*slow clap @ bozo, rdr, damo, and xorxes*

Good job guys. It totally worked.

##vote bozo

you believe all scum other than macca would have been positive regarding the mass claim?

This was more a point that the mass claim's goal and purpose has failed because one person failed to participate.

We now must speculate what that person was, which gives scum all the advantage of the world and we did not gain a true advantage.

It was better if everyone participated, that does not mean it failed. We know where three of the scum are, we don't know where one of them is thanks to TRC.

[Donny Dude]

Alright, I fulfilled posting requirements. I start vacation tomorrow so I may see you again before EOD.

If not, at least I won't be subbed!

Have fun!
Where are you going to?

[Vecna]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

[xorxes]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

I very much doubt he said anything in his chat given that he only posted twice in here.

[damo666]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

[xorxes]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

How could they not know?

[flash2015]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

Seriously? After all that math you tried to bamboozle us with on the first day are you really now trying to play that dumb?

##VOTE damo

[rdrivera2005]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

I don't think we should speculate on buddy pairs right now. Maybe later if needed but we already give too much info on it to scum.

Today we lynch on the VT pool. Scoutmaster should tell his N1 target at EON. With some luck he have at least one more scan.

[brainbomb]

why are we waiting til EON2 to lynch a confirmed maf

[rdrivera2005]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

They know the claims. It's a simpler math then yours....

[rdrivera2005]

why are we waiting til EON2 to lynch a confirmed maf

To give Scoutmaster at least one more shot.

[worcej]

Alright, I fulfilled posting requirements. I start vacation tomorrow so I may see you again before EOD.

If not, at least I won't be subbed!

Have fun!
Where are you going to?

Newport, OR - father in law is turning 80 and wants to go to.

#YOLO

[damo666]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

Seriously? After all that math you tried to bamboozle us with on the first day are you really now trying to play that dumb?

##VOTE damo

Doh! Penny has dropped.

[worcej]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

This is next level dumb right here...

[summit_fever]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

This is next level dumb right here...

it was a joke no? similar to xorxes' kgray joke in m1011? That's how I took it.

[Donny Dude]

Im having thoughts. The fact scum killed the no reveal guy either means he was a PR, or they were desperate enough to kill a VT to make us all get suspicious.

It might also mean they have had a chat with the guy so they would be certain noone was told the role there in secret.

How would they know if he was PR or VT?

Really?
I am still up for lynching Jamiet/Chaqa though based on their hard resistance to the mass claim.